Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Good articles

Requirements

Nominations

Former good articles

This is the voting and review page for good article nominations. Good articles are articles on the Star Wars Fanon Wiki that are meant to represent the norm of what the wiki has to offer in the way of standards of quality, but the standards are not as high as those of featured articles. Out of 66,109 on this wiki, fewer than two hundred (200) are currently of good status.

In order for an article to become a good article, it must meet a set of requirements. After it is nominated on this page, users will then review and vote on it to determine whether it is of good article quality based on the requirements.

---

An article must…

1. … be identified with proper era icons.
2. … be well written, comprehensive and detailed; however, not to the extent of the requirement for a Featured Article.
   1. To be well written, the article must have a prose that is engaging and of a professional standard.
   2. To be detailed, an article must be written in an encyclopedic format with no point of view in the detail, though that detail is not excess nor irrelevant; instead, the detail must also contact all relevant major facts and plot points.
   3. The article must acknowledge and explore all aspects of the subject and cover every encyclopedic angle.
   4. The article does not need to have a finished storyline.
   5. The article must be clear, using a logical structure written in plain language.
   6. The article must follow standard writing conventions of modern English (i.e., correct grammar, punctuation and spelling).
   7. All grammar and spelling must be one hundred percent accurate.
3. … have an introduction of at least one-hundred (100) words that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the greater detail in the following sections.
4. … follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, categorization policy, as well as all other policies.
5. … contain enough images where appropriate, but the page is not cluttered or overstocked.
6. … ensure that all images in said article follow the standards of sourcing in the Image policy.
7. … not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination.
8. … have absolutely no red links, as they must be filled with at least stubs or not be linked to at all.
9. … have no links in section titles, as this looks messy.
10. … have a brief "Personality and traits" section that generalizes the character's said personality.
11. … be stable, meaning that it is not the subject of any edit wars and that the content does not change significantly from day to day, reversions of vandalism and improvements based on suggestions not applying.

---

How to nominate:

1. First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of good article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below and add {{GAnom}} to the nominated article. If you are unsure as to how to set up the accompanying review page, feel free to check out the example review page we have provided for you. Please nominate in this format:

   === [[Article name]] (0)===

   '''[[CS:Article name|Objections and discussion]]'''

2. Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough at [[CS:Article name]], which is the review page for the nominated article. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources)
3. Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied and vote support beneath the article's nomination

---

How to vote:

1. Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy, which is at least fifty (50) mainspace edits.
2. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
3. Afterward, either support the article on this page, or visit the nominee's review page to state your objections
   1. If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
4. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.
5. To be a good article on Star Wars Fanon, a nomination must have at least six (6) votes. Articles will remain on the nominations track until they receive the required amount of votes or until the author pulls the nomination.
6. No article may become a good article if there are still active legitimate objections on its review page.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue check () in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Nominations

ARC-9999 (0)

Objections and discussion

Imperial Academy Boxing (3)

1. After a well-deserved, unanimous win in the Fifteenth Wiki Awards, this is the next logical step. IAB is a creative exploration of something that fits naturally into Star Wars generally and Imperial military culture specifically. All my initial comments have been satisfied, and the expansions have only made the article stronger. It's long past time we had a new Good Article, and this is an excellent one to lead the way. Sakaros^Talk 20:47, April 26, 2020 (UTC)
2. Good enough I'd say. -I'm the Chosen One 08:01, May 4, 2020 (UTC)
3. There are a few minor issues of formatting with which I took some issue, but seeing as this is a GA nomination rather than an FA nomination, I'll let them slide. Bravo. Sebolto^Talk 22:45, May 6, 2020 (UTC)

Objections and discussion

Ralia Arryn (0)

Objections and discussion