FANDOM

60,311 Pages
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hey there, I was an old user on this wikia a few years ago and I'm planning to delete all of my pages I've created as well as any photo that I've added for characters I made a few years ago on this wikia. I don't use this wikia anymore and I really would appreciate it if you can delete each page and picture I've created and added, since I can't delete them myself. I am 100% positive of my decision to delete the pages I've made and you have my permission to do so. Hopefully you can understand. Thank you so much and thanks for your understanding.

    Here are the links to those pages:

    https://swfanon.fandom.com/wiki/Tiberius_Starcade

    https://swfanon.fandom.com/wiki/Maximus_Starcade

    https://swfanon.fandom.com/wiki/File:Maximus.jpg

      Loading editor
  • Hey man! I'm contacting you (& the rest of the administrative team) to provide prior notice of an upcoming RFB vote on my nomination of Sakaros for Bureaucrat. Naturally, as standing Bureaucrat, your opinion on the matter is particularly welcome, & I'd encourage you to weigh in & voice your thoughts on the nomination if you have the time. The nomination is expected to go live this Saturday, May 2nd, & conclude on May 9th, provided no extension is required. Cheers!

      Loading editor
  • Hey! Could you weigh in here? Apparently Sak doesn't have the user rights permissions necessary to amend or remove the "Expand these articles" module from Special:Community, but you probably do as Bureaucrat. Thanks!

      Loading editor
  • I wanted to make sure you're tracking this proposal. I'm waiting until there's a week left to weigh in so it doesn't look like the admin team is putting a hand on the scale (although the scale seems to have tilted pretty hard without my help), but since we've had extensive discussions about this very issue in the past, I thought you might want to weigh in.

      Loading editor
  • 15WA Hello, I'm Sakaros, Star Wars Fanon Administrator and host of the Fifteenth Wiki Awards! Since you've been an active contributor here on Star Wars Fanon in the last year, I'd like to invite you to take part in this year's Wiki Awards in celebration of the best fanon & fan fiction our wiki has to offer!
      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Boss, do you mind weighing in here? Additionally, we're still waiting on your guidance here.

      Loading editor
    • I’ve replied to both. I appreciate the message as I don’t recall getting anything for that older one, which is unfortunate. Then again, my current breakneck lifestyle of job + grad school is... intense, to say the least, so it’s possible I just slipped up and missed it.

        Loading editor
    • Got your back, Boss. Good to hear from you, too; it's been far too long.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey man! Sak & I got to discussing templating during our time in Chat yesterday & came up with a proposal governing user contributions to the Template namespace we'd like you to look over. Sorry in advance for the wall of text—I feel an overview of the key points is in order so as to provide you the requisite context.

    Regarding user-made templates, I've since been operating according to the precedent you tacitly set here, here, & here & outright stated here that "if a similar template already exists among the officially supported & maintained templates, that template should be transcluded in place of a newly created duplicate." In most cases, I've generally gone about implementing this precedent in one of three ways: 1) redirecting the duplicate template to the official template, automatically transcluding the official by default, 2) replacing the duplicate's in-article transclusions with the official template before deleting the duplicate, or 3) updating the official template to reflect desired changes (for example, if a user creates a duplicate because the primary template has not yet been converted to mobile-friendly XML, I update the main template accordingly & delete its duplicate).

    I've generally been pretty liberal in my policing of the Template namespace due to the desire to reduce redundant clutter on the namespace, ensure a standardized aesthetic per the Layout Guide, & respect mobile contributors by ensuring only officially supported, mobile-friendly templates are used. Regarding the first two points, issues of aesthetic consistency have always been the purview of the administrative team—as I told Sak in Chat, that unstated precedent is the reason you two committed to my suggested overhaul of the infobox styling without feeling the need to submit a consensus track thread to the community first (to quote, "a Wiki-wide transformation like this isn't quite a Consensus Track issue..."). In my opinion, templates, infoboxes or otherwise, should share a unified aesthetic & appear similar on any page when viewed on any device.

    In addition to ensuring a unified design aesthetic, the requirement that users only transclude officially supported, readily maintained, & mobile-friendly templates also guarantees that all users—contributors & anonymous mobile viewers alike—can access pages on any device without issue, per content portability best practices. From what I gather from Community Central threads, a large segment of Wikia's viewing audience & even contributor base is made up of mobile viewers. As such, I figure enforcing the use of officially supported templates optimized for mobile is better than allowing a redundant mess of broken, half-working templates to clutter the namespace. If it were up to me, I would follow Wikipedia's precedent & lock down the Template namespace entirely with the MediaWiki namespace—while I would welcome user suggestions for new templates (just as Sak welcomes suggestions for new infobox CSS themes for MediaWiki pages), I believe it's best that the creation & editing of templates be left to those versed in template creation & mobile content portability best practices (incidentally, this is Wikipedia's approach as well, encapsulated in the template editor user right).

    Since I don't think we can lock down the namespace without submitting a request to Wikia Staff, Sak & I came to the consensus that we should instead have a forum subpage dedicated to user-submitted template proposals. The benefits of such a system would be two-fold: 1) to allow us to check if the proposed template already exists & redirect the user to an extant equivalent accordingly, or 2) allow the user to make a compelling case for either an inextant template's inclusion based on its potential for widespread use or the modification of an existing template by means of the addition of new fields. Per the MediaWiki documentation regarding their intended usage, templates should ideally be useful to multiple users in multiple contexts on multiple pages, not exclusive to overly specific use cases. A proposal system would help ensure that all templates exhibit such wiki-wide utility while not outright limiting user input regarding the creation of new templates.

    Your thoughts?

      Loading editor
    • Apologies for the late reply; I don’t recall ever getting an alert for this.

      While I appreciate your work with the template namespace, and I also see the value of unified design and functionality, my initial hesitation that jumps right to mind comes from templates like {{UNSWS}}, which I think users have always created (go back to Brandon’s ASWS and beyond), and which I think have real value. I have a hard time quickly jumping to limit users’ ability to do so without excessive red tape. I’m open to something, though, as your ultimate goals do seem like something worth striding for.

        Loading editor
    • Perhaps I should have clarified a bit more—the main subject of this discussion is infobox templates, not navigation or advisory templates like the aforementioned UNSWS. The latter rarely show up on mobile anyway as they are not built with Wikia's infobox XML & are not (usually) intended to even appear on mobile devices.

        Loading editor
    • Ah, my bad. I’m totally onboard with limiting infobox template creation. I think it’s kind of a no-brainer; as I believe I’ve said before, nearly every infobox need should be met with something already available.

        Loading editor
    • Alright then, with your permission, we'll go about implementing some form of infobox suggestion forum moderating the creation of new 'boxes & the modification of existing ones based on user request.

      Good to see you again, by the way! (:

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello there.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Still need you to weigh in here and issue guidance here.

      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • It seems to me that the “|bg1=“ from the template isn’t passing along to the ”{{#if:{{{BG1|}}}|{{{BG1}}}|94C7D1}}”, but that’s just a reckon, and I haven’t the foggiest how to fix that either.

      Unrelated, I think you should consider a “Category:Images from the UNSWS” given the increasing array of original commissioned images you’re curating.

        Loading editor
    • This reply has been removed
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I just got this message from the anon who had once been Wikimaniac. Wikimaniac was banned before our time for "vulgar, derogatory and uncyclopedic [sic]" content, and what few vestiges remain bear that out. He's made efforts to get unbanned before. That said, I respect his candor and up-front approach of admitting who he is rather than subtly sockpuppeting (which would probably have been easy, since all the users involved in that saga are gone now), and twelve years is a considerable period of time; on the other hand, I also don't think we should get a reputation for "infinite" meaning "for a really long while!" on a routine basis. All that said, I'm passing this one to you without recommendation.

      Loading editor
    • I haven’t made up my mind about my opinion on this yet—I need more time to think about it after reading the related materials—but I wanted to acknowledge that I’ve seen this and am considering it.

      That said, this isn’t a dictatorship or some such. If you have an opinion, I’d be glad to hear it.

        Loading editor
    • Oh I know, I just really am ambivalent on it; I'm torn between strong competing principles on each side.

        Loading editor
    • Although I’m personally open to some sort of one-strike-only trial, I think I ultimately come down more toward the side that “infinite” means “infinite”, and to make an exception without an exceptional reason is to open up to anyone who wants infinite to mean less than that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.