Star Wars Fanon
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Star Wars Fanon
​
66,107
pages
in: Featured article reviews, Good article reviews

CS:DL-3 blaster pistol

Sign in to edit

This is the archived review page for the successful good article nomination and featured article nomination of DL-3 blaster pistol.

Featured Article Nomination[]

This section is no longer active. Should you wish to voice your opinion on the article, please do so on its talk page.

Approve (5 Council of Seers/2 users/7 total)

  1. Council of Seers vote

GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 06:19, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

  1. A nicely unique article. Seems FA worthy now. Savage1138 14:40, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Council of Seers voteCute catapult yo. TK-999 (Talk) 21:28, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Council of Seers vote Did a pre-nom review a while back and went over it again a few days later. Still looks good. Trak Nar Ramble on 05:37, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Council of Seers vote --Wylind (talk)(narratives) 18:50, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Council of Seers vote Brandon Rhea(talk) 02:24, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Since not sourcing articles when stories are available isn't a valid objection, this meets all requirements so far as I am concerned.  Karohalva (Talk) 04:18, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

Objections

  1. SavageOpress1138
    • Development
      • "These "match-grade" weapons were considerably expensive..." Considerably? A thousand credits? A hundred? A million? POV.
        • Rewrote sentence to more accurately reflect the terminology used.

GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 03:34, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

    • Operational service
      • "Professional mercenaries, however, turned their noses up at these crude copies..." This sounds a little flowery, honestly.
        • Diluted the purple prose.

GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 03:34, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

    • Otherwise, it looks pretty good. I might have a few more objections, but nothing major. Savage1138 00:16, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Council of Seers vote TK-999 (Talk)
    • “The weapon's gas chamber, however, retained what was considered normal capacity.” Perhaps using wording such as "the standardized Republic capacity" or something like that would help clarify.
      • Reworked the sentence.

GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 20:28, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

    • Otherwise great. Fully fledged, gripping storyline! TK-999 (Talk) 17:25, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
      • Bwahahaha.

GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 20:28, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Good Article Nomination[]

This section is no longer active. Should you wish to voice your opinion on the article, please do so on its talk page.

Approve (4 Seers/3 users/7 total)

  1. We'll have a blast(er)!

GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 03:24, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

  1. Council of Seers vote It's good. --D.W. (talk)(Glorior) 06:30, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Council of Seers vote It's good article worthy. -BluethunderContact 23:52, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Excellent, very comprehensive. --Marek "Mighty" Joesph (Talk) 00:58, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
  4. The standard for general weapon articles, IMO, this gets the job done.-I'm the Chosen OneSo the Prophecy says... 04:16, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Council of Seers vote Objections struck. It's good to go. Trak Nar Ramble on 08:22, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Council of Seers vote Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird (talk) 00:12, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Objections

  1. Council of Seers vote What Trak Could Find
    • Details
      • "was large enough for a thickly-armored finger to have comfortable pull." The usage of "comfortable" is subjective.
        • Objection dealt with via IRC, thus struck.
    • History
      • Development
        • Made a slight wording adjustment and linked.
      • Operational service
        • Linkings.
      • Obsolescence
        • More linkage.
    • Overall
      • Looks pretty solid to me. Did a couple copy-edits where needed. Other than the subjective prose mentioned above, it passes my judgment. Trak Nar Ramble on 08:13, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Comments Hopefully this one's up to snuff. If someone thinks it'd make a good FAN, however, I'd be perfectly happy to expand the intro and add moar quotes, etc. as necessary. GoodwoodDebating Society11,988 Edits 03:23, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms
Advertisement

Fan Feed

More Star Wars Fanon