This is the archived review page for the rejected good article nomination of Assault on Geonosis.
Nomination[]
Good article (rejected)[]
This section is no longer active. Should you wish to voice your opinion on the article, please do so on its talk page.
Objections[]
From the Resolute Desk of Brandon Rhea:
- Image policy failures throughout. Image:Assault1.jpg, Image:Geonosis Rebels-Empire2.jpg, Image:Geonosis Rebels-Empire.jpg and Image:Assault 2.jpg all have image sourcing errors.
- Grammar issues throughout.
- Tense issues.
- Lack of context in numerous areas.
- Many items require linking.
- No behind the scenes section.
- I’m proposing the removal of this article as a nominee and asking the authors to actually read the good article requirements and all applicable policies, then rewrite this article so it conforms to standards. Right now, it’s not up to snuff. The obvious failures of the good article requirements throughout the article make it so it’s not worth the effort it would take to give an in depth review. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments[]
Before you write anything, I have to say that the article is written by two users, JEA13 and me. I gave the main idea and wrote the introduction and the infobox as well as the sections "Before the Assault" and "Space Battle". JEA wrote the rest of the sections, "Land Battle " and "Outcome". As for the images, two are uploaded by me (the infobox image and another one), when the rest of them are uploaded by JEA.--Odysseas-Spartan53 16:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Vote to reject – Seers ONLY (5/5)[]
- Per my objections. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nowhere near standards. --
(talk) (contributions) 17:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC) - Per above. -Solus (Bird of Prey) 18:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. Unit 8311
Talk! 18:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC) - Give it a shakedown and then come back. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page) 18:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
