All posts by Legodude494

So now the only thing left is duplicative categorization, which means one or more of your applied categories are unnecessary. From what I can see, I think removing "individuals" and "Force-sensitives" should be removed, as they are covered by the other categories.

That's because they are not automated, the admins manually have to remove and add these things. Give it a few hours or so for them to see it and it should be fine.

So looking at it, the only thing currently wrong is empty section headers (i.e. your "personality traits" section), etc. Either deleting them completely (you can always add them back later) or giving them a sentence or two will satisfy the problem and get tge templates removed.

Why do you believe that? They might not be for everyone, sure, but then that's true for everyone. You clearly cared a lot for them and were passionate about the world you were creating, and some people will have seen them and liked them. If you don't wish to continue building it, so be it, you can move on to a new project or continuity, but I don't believe you should have them all deleted.

The admins probably just haven't looked at it yet. Give it a bit of time for them to look at it, I've had a look and it seems fine, but wait a bit for the admin to see it. There's always the Fanon Discord you can join if you want more help from others.

They will literally only take you a few minutes at most to fix in this case due to the short length of your article, and you have at least 4 days to do so. It's not too late at all!

The applied templates look scary (and they are) but they are also quite helpful in telling you what to do. In the case of your article, you need to add it to a category (the "Mid Rim planets" category is most applicable I believe), chance it to past tense wording (changing "is" to "was" for example), make the name of the article bold in the first sentence (So it should look like "Muff was a planet...") and the infobox needs to be moved to the very top of the article. As for the spelling, it just needs to be in American English so just copy the article into word and set it to American English should help you.

I managed to avoid falling into most traps of new users on here because I've edited other wikis, so I mostly followed how other articles were laid out and went from there. However, I know for many users, this will be their first time ever editing or adding to a wiki, so here's what I would like to see if I were a new user here:

• Contact information for a moderator, or moderators, if I have any technical questions about things (friendly welcome message optional ;) )

• A link to the manual of style and image policy, since that mostly covers the mistakes that I and countless other people have made here.

• Having some sort of explaination about the advisory templates would be very beneficial. Even now as a, and I tentatively use this, "experienced" editor on here, I still get frightened at the advisory templates. Writing them out in a message each time would be time consuming and a wall of text, so a wiki page instead just with explainations of what they are, why they are added and what to do to correct them would be beneficial. Also because the templates by themselves can sometimes be vague in what they actually want fixed, so a wiki page explaining them would only be beneficial in my opinion.

• Possibly, as Rick says, perhaps a link to a featured work or good article would be useful so you can see what sort of standard the wiki is looking for. Obviously, you can't expect someone's first article to be to the same standard, but as a 'top of the line' example it could be beneficial.

• Possibly a link to the discord as Rick also says, since the discord has other users active and it's probably quicker and less janky than Fandom message walls to get an answers from people (plus it gets more engagement and fresh blood into the discord).

There could be other things, but these are just off the top of my head. Wall of text, yes, and I apologise, but these are my two pence on what I think would be beneficial to a new user of the wiki, to avoid them getting frustrated and leaving, which I have seen happen once or twice on here.

Can be just called "X Legion", though I'm naming my Clone Legion as the "X Clone Legion" to avoid confusion with other legions of other armies (such as the Morsian Legions I have in my faction)

You need to designate clones by their CT number, however, not by their given name, just so you are aware.

Yes