User blog comment:Brandon Rhea/What is fanon?/@comment-1169345-20091026174826

I meant that they have a lack of policies that create structure, and that should foster organization and professionalism (the look of the article basically).

That means that they (other sites) are disorganized and lack structure that is needed when new members join. If a lot of websites already had what we have, then there would be less of a problem, don't you agree?

I agree that fanon needs a "new look", but that isn't the whole problem.

I would say that the policies are easy to understand, but there are major rewrites going on...so I can't.