Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip; be identified with proper era icons.
 * 2) &hellip; be well written, comprehensive and detailed; however, not to the extent of the requirement for a Featured Article.
 * 3) To be well written, the article must have a prose that is engaging and of a professional standard.
 * 4) To be detailed, an article must be written in an encyclopedic format with no point of view in the detail, though that detail is not excess nor irrelevant; instead, the detail must also contact all relevant major facts and plot points.
 * 5) The article must acknowledge and explore all aspects of the subject and cover every encyclopedic angle.
 * 6) The article does not need to have a finished storyline.
 * 7) The article must be clear, using a logical structure written in plain language.
 * 8) The article must follow standard writing conventions of modern English (ie, correct grammar, punctuation and spelling).
 * 9) All grammar and spelling must be one hundred percent accurate. The High Priests and voting members of the community will inspect all of it to make proper edits.
 * 10) &hellip; have an introduction of at least one-hundred and fifty (150) words that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the greater detail in the following sections.
 * 11) &hellip; follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, categorization policy, as well as all other policies.
 * 12) &hellip; contain enough images where appropriate, but the page is not cluttered or overstocked.
 * 13) &hellip; ensure that all images in said article follow the standards of sourcing in the Image policy.
 * 14) &hellip; not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination.
 * 15) &hellip; have absolutely no red links, as they must be filled with at least stubs or not be linked to at all.
 * 16) &hellip; have no links in section titles.
 * 17) &hellip; have a brief "Personality and traits" section that generalizes the character's said personality
 * 18) &hellip; be stable, meaning that it is not the subject of any edit wars and that the content does not change significantly from day to day, reversions of vandalism and improvements based on suggestions not applying.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article. Please nominate in this format:
 * ===Article name ===
 * ====Support====
 * ====Oppose====
 * ====Neutral/comments====
 * 1) Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 2) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 3) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * Gladiatorial combat (0)
 * Battle of Gand (0)

Oppose

 * 1) See below -
 * From the infobox:
 * 1) *The eras should be separated by bullet points.
 * From the introduction:
 * 1) *“with different weapons against each other” - for some variety, I suggest changing “each other” to “one another”.
 * 2) *Should Afterlife be capitalized in this case?
 * 3) *There should be a comma between “Therefore” and “the idea”.
 * 4) *Inhuman should be inhumane because you’re not referring to Humans.
 * 5) *The entirety of Yuuzhan Vong War should be capitalized.
 * 6) *“New Republic era” is an out-of-universe reference and should not be referred to in the text of the article, unless it is in Behind the scenes.
 * From “The games”:
 * 1) *You should refrain from including (editor) like that in parentheses. Instead, you should say “organizer or editor”.
 * 2) *“combats against each” should be “combat against each other”.
 * 3) *The sentence that begins with “Usually this winner” and the sentence that begins with “But he could be spared” should be merged together.
 * 4) *“In the later days of the Republic” - specify which Republic you are referring to.
 * 5) *“assigning” should be “assign”
 * 6) *There does not need to be a comma after “play” and before “and the actual”.
 * 7) *There should be a comma between “fights” and “musicians”.
 * 8) *“rather successful lives” should be the end of the sentence. A new sentence should begin with “Some were able to purchase”.
 * 9) *The sentence that ends with “defensive fighter types” and the sentence that begins with “whereas the little shields” should be merged into one sentence.
 * 10) *The sentence beginning with “Little shields always had an advantage” is rather long. You should find a way to shorten it or break it up.
 * More will come for the following sections tomorrow. All and all, this is a good read so far. There's just quite a few grammar problems, but that can be easily fixed. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 04:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Neutral/comments
Alright. Thanks for the speedy review. Keep the corrections coming. I'll start fixing the grammar problems as soon as time permits.
 * You're welcome, and sure thing. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 16:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * I think its GA status. The redlink will be dealt with in a matter of minutes. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 16:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll be reviewing this tomorrow. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 04:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)