Star Wars Fanon:User of the Month

User of the Month is an award given to those users who the community believe they deserve it. A good candidate should be helpful in the community, by participating in the community wide editing war by cleaning up articles, categorizing, sourcing images. A good candidate should also be a trustworthy and a welcoming one, who tries to help and guide new users to follow policies, to become active community members. Of course, a good candidate should be an active writer of their own fanon. The reward of User of the Month is held for one month, after a winner is determined.

There are some simple guidelines all users must follow, when nominating and voting for a user.
 * You may nominate as many users as you'd like, however, you may not nominate yourself.
 * You must meet the requirements to the Voting policy to vote. All rules of the voting policy apply here. Also, valid oppositions must be given as to why you don't believe a user should be User of the Month, or else your vote will be voided.
 * Remember, if you have no valid reason to oppose someone, but don't wish to support them, then don't vote at all.
 * You may vote for every nominee, one way or another, but you may not vote for the same nominee twice. You also may not vote for yourself.
 * All former Users of the Week will be eligible to become a User of the Month immediately. Once a user wins User of the Month, the user is not eligible to win User of the Month again until six months have passed since their win.

Nominations will be open throughout each month, but a winner is not determined until the end of each month.

Former winners of the User of the Month award can be found in the archives.

Support

 * 1) After some careful consideration, I’ve decided to nominate and throw my support behind Wylind to be the next User of the Month. Let me preface this by saying that, initially, I wasn’t going to support him. Why? This forum, which can basically be described as a temper tantrum. But let’s face it. If one stupid thing is going to disqualify someone from receiving an award, I’d be disqualified from everything forever. Besides, there were good intentions in that forum, because he really wants to see this wiki thrive. He’s not just all talk, though. He’s pushing and actively participating in FanonProject. He’s doing simple things like voting for FAs, GAs, QOTWs, and proposals. He’s proposing things for the community on his own. He’s even going so far as to personally welcome newly registered users on their talk page. That’s just over the top, man, but over the top is what UOTM is for. After all, look at our last few UOTMs: Antonstaen, JM76, Michael, Vic, and Nacen. You can go straight to hell if you're going to accuse...well, you know the rest. The fact is, Wylind does a lot of good work here and is very helpful, all while receiving very little recognition for it. The best part about that, though, is the fact that he’s not asking for it. He’s not prancing around with passive aggressive suggestions that he should be nominated, unlike some people. This nomination is coming because he deserves it, not because he asked for it. He may not even want it considering comments he’s made recently, but I strongly advise him to accept it. He deserves it. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 03:15, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) He had my vote last time, but I was almost about to oppose this. However, he has appeared to have grown up since that "incident" so I will back him once again.-- Josh Bender Talk 19:53, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Nacen (Talk) 02:09, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) You can go straight to hell if you're going to accuse… well, you know the rest. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 01:03, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) * Wow. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  01:06, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

Comments
Bumping this onto the recent changes list since it's been up for nine days and no one has voted. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 19:49, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Another BUMP. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  22:59, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

Mine was fine. Yours was shameless. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 23:08, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * . --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  00:09, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

One, last bump. -- (Conference Room)  02:28, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, this bump was unnecessary.-- Josh Bender Talk 02:32, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Ok seriously, don't bump your own nomination. My last comment may have been in jest, but it really is shameless. If there's only four votes, there's only four votes. It's not going to prevent you from becoming UOTM. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 02:33, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, fine. Just compared to last month, hardly anybody voted. If it's because they don't want to vote for me, I obviously understand. But, if it's because they're unaware a new nomination has been posted, then that's why I'm doing this. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  02:36, October 31, 2009 (UTC)