Thread:Sebolto/@comment-36984184-20180922145654/@comment-36984184-20180922152954

Overall that's all fine,

As for ascertaining what the author meant by "Fired" however that's entirely debatable until the original author comes in and says they meant X. But I would personally say that since in the context given they described how the batallion was fired, and then fought the 501st, and later a large component of them joined the rebellion that heavily implies that they were branded traitors, and fired simply doesn't work in that context. I'd recommend using a middle ground for that point, perhaps rephrasing to "Discontinued" in order to maintain the same level of vagueness, and allow the author to edit freely upon their return. This would also reduce confusion of reading the page in the mean time.

Although as the Editing policy states I am within my rights to edit the page without author permission if I'm Correcting Grammar. Since it had been clearly stated that the battalion became traitors at least in part during that time period I do not believe that my edit was wrong in that capacity. Although I do understand what you're saying.