Thread:Sakaros/@comment-1998339-20190224213457/@comment-24.239.218.130-20190225220018

Sakaros wrote: Happy to put out the announcement.

As to the page, I threw on a one-week protection to stop the edit war given that the anon was removing material. However, that one is an interesting case. If you read the edit history back, you'll see it's had dozens of contributors since its creation. This is a rare case where I'm willing to call it "de facto free-edit" given the uninterrupted pattern of allowing contributions from pretty much anybody. That said, like any free-edit article, that only allows adding content, not removing or changing it, so your anon's still in the wrong. Hey, that would happen to be me. I'm new to fanon, so I'm not really familiar with the term "edit-free". I was removing the name of a Jedi from the "Victims" category, as there is no evidence that the character had died. If it shouldn't be removed, what should be done to replace the incorrect status? A paragraph above the states that the character's fate is unknown, but the category his name appears in states that he was a victim.