Thread:Brandon Rhea/@comment-25898954-20150131111950/@comment-20644-20150222195412

I definitely agree there should be some degree of objective quality, but I'd rather just let the community handle that without a new bureaucratic layer. We had the Council of Seers for GAs and FAs for many years, and after the first year or so, I honestly found the group to be more of an impediment than a help. There was a lot of laziness (myself included) so Seer reviews, which were mandatory, barely ever happened.

If we ever found a need for a new group then we can always cross that bridge when we get there, but to start off I think we'd be better off without a group. What do you think about that?