Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-104549-20151023030710/@comment-3528596-20151023033947

IMHO, it's a permissible edit. Here's why. Per the Participation Guidelines, I'm going to start with assuming good faith and assuming he's "editing with good intent".

Per the Article guidelines, "Fanon pages must contain proper spelling and grammar." A large part of his edit falls into this category. A sentence fragment is not proper grammar, so in my mind "CT-7024 was a... (expand and explain)" is not proper grammar. Is it speedy deletion worthy? No. But it can be fixed.

As for removing the empty section headers, I think that is also fine. That could be considered "Organizing...the page" which is allowed per the Editing policy. Additionally, in my mind, the layout guide makes it clear that not every section is always applicable, even if it doesn't quite use those words.

The clincher for me is that he didn't change any narrative/in-universe details. He just made the article easier to read and comprehend.

Thoughts? Does that work for you? Are there any holes in my process you see?