Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Due to the High Priests being very overwhelmed with nominations, we will not be accepting any more than five nominations for the coming rounds. This is subject to change in coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Beta-1, Merc Gev (1)
 * 2) Shikkri (-1)
 * 3) Sadious (1)

=Nominations=

Support

 * 1) My best article.
 * 2) I said I would vote for it. Its pretty darn good, content and grammer.
 * 3) Good. Wouldn't make feature status.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 16:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Some grammar and spelling mistakes.
 * 2) Along with grammar and spelling errors, the tense and structure in the P&T section should be changed. Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 17:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I put a lot of work into this one, in it's scope and in trying to make it comprehensible. I'd like to think it was at least 'good.' - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Contains missplaced out-of universe content and it has no intro.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 16:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Was working on the intro when I had to leave and I just got back. Will address in a sec. And can you point out the OOU info, please? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Intro added.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per above.
 * 5) Per above, and also the bold and italics message at the beginning should be moved to the talk page.
 * 6) *Done - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I think it's up to G.A standards. Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 16:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) OK. here we go.