DL:Collective automated binary administration livewire

Disapprove/complaints

 * 1) Does not comply with rules 2,8,9,11. Lacks detail, the introduction is significantly less than 200 words (which, as Vic believes, it should be) and has a very noticeable and important red link. Personality, traits and characteristics could also be expanded. Not yet FA quality. - Brandon Rhea 05:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Rhea. -- Victor  ( talk ) 05:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Vic. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 11:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Not really an FA, though it is a clever idea. Such an important topic could have so much more. --C3PO the Dragon Slayer 6,000,000 forms of communication 19:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Per them. Quick question: due to such unanimous disapproval, why is this nom still up here? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  15:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *Because all GAs have the chance to become an FA, even if all DLs disapprove of the article. They remain here (forever, I guess) until the user either fixes up the problems and it gets approved, or until the user asks to take down the GA from FA nomination because he doesn't wish to bring it up to FA standards. If the user feels like nominating it for FA later, he may do so. So for now, until Jasca either improves the article and the DLs approve or until he takes it down, it stays here. -- Don Victor, Sr.  [[Image:Coat of arms of Mexico.png|20px]] ( contact ) 01:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) **Okaaaay... for now I guess that's fine, as we don't have millions here who are disapproved and taking up space. Maybe later I'll ask Jasca if he plans to, and to post it here whether yea or nay. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  01:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Indeed. -- Don Victor, Sr.  [[Image:Coat of arms of Mexico.png|20px]] ( contact ) 01:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Per the above. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 20:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)