Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Due to the High Priests being very overwhelmed with nominations, we will not be accepting any more than five nominations for the coming rounds. This is subject to change in coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Merc Gev (6)
 * 2) Battle of Abyssion V, Shikkri (5)
 * 3) Sadious (4)
 * 4) Beta-1 (1)

=Nominations= ''' We are no longer accepting nominations at this time, thanks for understanding! '''

Support

 * 1) My best article.
 * 2) I said I would vote for it. Its pretty darn good, content and grammer.
 * 3) Good. Wouldn't make feature status.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 16:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Seond best on here only to Sadious--'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 22:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Some grammar and spelling mistakes.
 * 2) Along with grammar and spelling errors, the tense and structure in the P&T section should be changed. Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 17:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I changed the tense in P&T.
 * 4) I did my best on spelling and grammar.
 * 5) And now the P&T structure is changed.

Comments

 * I think it's a lot too much like Grievous minus the "Rebirth" part.
 * I was about to say the same. Basically the Grievous story. --  Riffsyphon  1024 09:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * General G never became a Jedi, he didn't cause a rebellion, he didn't get injured by Jedi, he was never bombed, and he didn't live his life to avenge his friend.

Support

 * 1) I put a lot of work into this one, in it's scope and in trying to make it comprehensible. I'd like to think it was at least 'good.' - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 21:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice language article.
 * 4) Very well developed and thought out. --Darthfish 23:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Good. I have never seen anyone out so much effort and time into a language.  Congrats!
 * 6) Very well done. -- Victor  ( talk ) 21:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Contains missplaced out-of universe content and it has no intro.  N@M3Le$  |  Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 16:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Was working on the intro when I had to leave and I just got back. Will address in a sec. And can you point out the OOU info, please? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Intro added.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***The OOU was the old intro. So I will change my vote to support.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 21:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Expand the intro.
 * 6) Per above, and also the bold and italics message at the beginning should be moved to the talk page.
 * 7) *Done - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I think it's up to G.A standards. Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 16:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Indeed.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 22:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, nice story/well written and up to GA standards. -- Victor  ( talk ) 00:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Very nice.
 * 2) Very good. Nicely written.[[Image:CurrentBigThingSig.jpg|150px]] 15:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good.

Support

 * 1) OK. here we go.
 * You cannot vote, even if you sign as your original account. No exceptions for sockpuppets. -- Victor  ( talk ) 22:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) Definately.--'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 00:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good article. Reggie935 19:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Mhm...  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 08:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Good article.

Support

 * 1) Yeah, it could use a few more pictures, but I would deem it worthy to be a good article.
 * You cannot vote, even if you sign as your original account. No exceptions for sockpuppets. -- Victor  ( talk ) 22:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) JM at his finest.
 * 2) A very good article.
 * 3) Per Gnosis.
 * 4) Per N@M3Le$$.
 * 5) Very well written and formatted. -- Victor  ( talk ) 21:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral/Comments
=PLEASE NOTE= ''' We are no longer accepting nominations at this time, thanks for understanding! '''