Star Wars Fanon:Deletion page/Category:Nathan Wojlaker

Support (4)

 * 1) I'd go for deleting this category: category pages, as the name suggests, would serve to catalogize content, whereas the author would intend to use this category in places where a link to the Nathan Wojlaker article would suffice. TK-999 (Talk) 21:13, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) For insufficient category breadth; per below discussion, it really can't be a category of more than one. Sakaros Talk 21:29, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) As the one who first placed the tag, I concur. The author has added a number of extraneous categories of this nature which add no real value to the categorization of the wiki.  Fire  dance  22:34, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) I don't see any reason for a character to have their own separate category. Alexander of Volzhsky

Discussion
I have not found anything wrong about the category I created. The only thing I can think is wrong is that it's subcategory in Barsen'thor. However, the Nathan Wojlaker is a place that expands to other article for the Nathan Wojlaker article. So it would have the same catergories as the article. As I have seen I have done no relative harm to others except posting that sub-category. I would try to offend or harm anyone's beliefs they do what they do on the wiki. The Wiki network is a place where people can unwind and share Ideas. I would hate to ruin that for anyone.
 * What other articles do you envision being in the category? It seems to me that it might be one thing if it was "Articles in the Nathan Wojlaker universe" (might or might not survive deletion review, but it's certainly broader), whereas a category called "Nathan Wojlaker" really can't reasonable include any other articles. Sakaros Talk 16:38, June 26, 2015 (UTC)