Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best the Star Wars Fanon Wiki has to offer.

What makes a featured article or what article should you nominate to feature? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;a Good article.
 * 2) &hellip;be well written and detailed.
 * 3) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 4) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 5) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 6) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 7) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination
 * 8) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 9) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links; use common sense (no more then ten)
 * 10) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 2 or more supports than any other article and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!!

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Current Standings
These standings are determined by who has the most votes. This may, however, not be the way the winner is determined. Also, oppositions will lower the amount of votes you have, as long as they're for a good reason. Neutral does nothing.


 * Ussej Padric Bac III (3)
 * Battle of Vuur (1)
 * Abigaile Jade Kenobi, Yun-Yaramal, Xander Vos (0)
 * Battle of Ruusan (-1)

=Nominations=

Neutral

 * It's rather short, therefore lacking some detail. For example, this guy is obviously some sort of God so would his history and legacy really only encompass four paragraphs and four very small paragraphs, respectively? You'd also want to put in the era this character lived in. The intro paragraph is also very short, so you'll want to make that more detailed as well. - Brandon Rhea 14:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * A bit of a stretch, I know. But its worth a shot! No redlinks, (should be) no spelling grammar errors, etc., detailed, formatted. I know its A LOT shorter than my other FA's but.... -- [[Image:JM76Sig.gif]] Talk to an Admin Mind Trick Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg]] 02:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * The only problems I really see are a lack of links and the "Notes" section, which I believe could simply be added into the article, but that's not enough to keep me from supporting the article. - Brandon Rhea 14:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I too am going to "stretch" it. This is the only battle I put my best effort into, and I think it came out rather nicely. It should be a decent article at least (I think so) and even though it's short, I still think it's FA material. I hope you all like it. PS: I won't be voting for my own article, so it has a fair shot at winning and losing.

Support

 * 1) I entered this into the last round of voting only two days before the voting was over, so not enough people were able to see it. Hopefully now there will be more time! Anyway, I worked for a long time on this article and I feel it is up to FA standards. Plenty of links, no redlinks, a great deal of pictures and it is well written. - Brandon Rhea 14:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good article, as I've stated previoulsy.
 * 3) See above.

Neutral

 * It's rather short and it only contains one picture. I'm not sure about this one yet. - Brandon Rhea 00:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I will not vote for this article until it has gone under the rest of the Decreton Lord's review.

Oppose

 * Needs some fixing up.

Neutral

 * I'm going to be honest: I really don't think it's all that good. It has potential, but in it's current state I do not feel that it's worthy of FA status. It's short, it lacks detail, the aftermath section is a sentence long, the pictures are at the bottom of the page with no text and the intro seems like it should be a seperate "Precursor to Battle" section within the history rather than an intro, which should really (in my opinion) be a summary of the entire article. It has potential, so therefore I won't oppose it outright, but it's definately not worthy of FA status in it's current state. - Brandon Rhea 03:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I will not vote for this article until it has gone under DL review.