Star Wars Fanon:User of the Month

 User of the Month is an award given to those users who have demonstrated an outstanding commitment and helpfulness to the Star Wars Fanon wiki. A good candidate should be helpful in the community by participating in article writing, community events, and good and featured article voting. They should also demonstrate a helpfulness that goes above and beyond what would normally be expected for a user, and they should try to help guide new users into becoming active community members. Users of the Month are meant to be the best examples of what our wiki has to offer.

Nomination process:

There is a simple process that all candidates go through in order to be selected as a User of the Month. That process is as follows:


 * 1) Any user may nominate any user other than themselves. They may also nominate as many users as they want, though they may only vote for one per month.
 * 2) However, users may not be chosen as a User of the Month if they have previously won the award in the last six (6) months. Even so, strive to nominate people who have not won before.
 * 3) Users will either support or oppose the candidates. Users must provide a reason for voting against a candidate. Users must meet the requirements of the voting policy to vote.
 * 4) At the end of each month, the candidate with the most votes will be that month's winner. All candidates will be removed from the nominations page and archived.
 * 5) Users who are not successfully chosen as User of the Month that month may be re-nominated at any time.

How to nominate:

When you nominate a user, please use the following nomination form in order to maintain a sense of organization on the nominations track:


 * === Candidate's name ===
 * ==== Support (#) ====
 * ==== Neutral ====
 * ==== Oppose ====
 * ==== Comments ====

Candidates will remain on the nominations track until the end of the month, unless the nominee removes him or herself before then. The candidate with the most votes will be the User of the Month. All nominees from that month will be added to the archive.

Support (+4)

 * 1) He's got my vote. His articles are good, he's been pretty active, I hardly ever find typos or spelling errors to correct, and he's the only nomination right now.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 04:46, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Although I do think the fact that Wylind accepted this nomination is blatant hypocrisy, and he has made some stupid moves in the past few months that have been fairly divisive, that doesn't change the fact that he's still one of the most helpful users we have. Just use your brain a bit more. ;) - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 17:56, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) You know, I've done some stupid stuff during my time here. Wylind, you've just done worse, no offense. I weakly support in hopes that you'll clean up your act. Don't make me regret this man.-- Josh Bender Talk 18:04, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) This might be the one time I don't have something to say. --[[image:Sw9889.jpg|100px]] (Have something to say?) 00:33, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) While I agree with Trak, I think its been too soon. My vote may change though. -Bluethunder Contact 04:53, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) * #Neutral until I see if he accepts this nomination, though I should point out that accepting it would be the epitome of hypocrisy. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 14:47, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) * #Wylind's a mixed bag but I'm leaning more to the oppose side at the moment. Will change vote if he accepts.-- Josh Bender Talk 19:15, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) * Sorry. Double checked some things and I neither support nor oppose.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:41, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

 * #For this very reason.-- Josh Bender Talk 02:55, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) I agree.--Station7 (Talk) 12:40, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
After some serious consideration, I'm going to accept this nomination. To the links Brandon posted: I have no excuses. I'm not going to lie: I've been foolish and stupid at times in the past. I know this, and I take full responsibility. While I would like to be UOTM again and consider it a great honor, I am not going to be upset if you should vote to oppose based on my "mixed bag" past. I will respect your vote, no matter what it is. It is up to you. (Btw, Rhea, you forgot to link to this. ) -- D.W. the Mixed Bag (talk) 02:53, May 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * That forum you linked to shows a lack of judgment, albeit one that, to me, would have no bearing on my vote here one way or another. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 04:15, May 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * This is not because of the nominations Darth Wylind, but because what I have read there. --Station7 (Talk) 19:12, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 17:54, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Hasn't done enough, outside of his own work, to warrant the award, yet.- I'm the Chosen One So the Prophecy says... 02:41, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Chosen One. -- D.W. (talk) 02:26, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Too new, not helping enough to consider a support.-- Josh Bender Talk 18:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
The most part I'm working on my story etc. But I also if I can, I help other users. I also created this. I also like to help other users like Darth Void.--Station7 (Talk) 05:49, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination anyway.--Station7 (Talk) 19:20, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Sorry, but even he'd admit that he's way too inactive for this award. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 17:54, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Agreed. -- D.W. (talk) 02:24, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Brandon Rhea.--Station7 (Talk) 09:28, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Like Brandon said, not active enough.-- Josh Bender Talk 18:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)