Forum:Adjustment to Critic's Lounge

If anyone has noticed, the Critic's Lounge hasn't proven to be to popular. Only two critics, each met with some complaint. It may only be time, but I'm thinking more that people don't want to point out how bad "so-and-so" article is, at risk of offending the offer. With that said, wouldn't you agree that if the author volunteered their article for critiquing, then it would be easier? First off, it prevents having to go out and find an article to critique (although I sincerely doubt that is much of an issue), but more importantly, people know the author wants the article critiqued. That way, an article doesn't have to critiqued if the author doesn't want it to be.

I think the Critic's Lounge would get more activity this way, and am sure that an ample amount of articles will be put up to be critiqued. I am willing right now to place two or three articles up, and I'm sure many other users will have no problem doing the same. Okay, everything is laid out now.

Oh, on a side note, isn't the word "critique" a weird word? Critiquing? Critiqued? Critic? Why isn't it Critiq? Or Critiqing? Weird...

(Speak. I Listen) (Creations) 22:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)