Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip; be identified with proper era icons.
 * 2) &hellip; be well written, comprehensive and detailed; however, not to the extent of the requirement for a Featured Article.
 * 3) To be well written, the article must have a prose that is engaging and of a professional standard.
 * 4) To be detailed, an article must be written in an encyclopedic format with no point of view in the detail, though that detail is not excess nor irrelevant; instead, the detail must also contact all relevant major facts and plot points.
 * 5) The article must acknowledge and explore all aspects of the subject and cover every encyclopedic angle.
 * 6) The article does not need to have a finished storyline.
 * 7) The article must be clear, using a logical structure written in plain language.
 * 8) The article must follow standard writing conventions of modern English (ie, correct grammar, punctuation and spelling).
 * 9) All grammar and spelling must be one hundred percent accurate. The High Priests and voting members of the community will inspect all of it to make proper edits.
 * 10) &hellip; have an introduction of at least one-hundred and fifty (150) words that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the greater detail in the following sections.
 * 11) &hellip; follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, categorization policy, as well as all other policies.
 * 12) &hellip; contain enough images where appropriate, but the page is not cluttered or overstocked.
 * 13) &hellip; ensure that all images in said article follow the standards of sourcing in the Image policy.
 * 14) &hellip; not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination.
 * 15) &hellip; have absolutely no red links, as they must be filled with at least stubs or not be linked to at all.
 * 16) &hellip; have no links in section titles.
 * 17) &hellip; have a brief "Personality and traits" section that generalizes the character's said personality
 * 18) &hellip; be stable, meaning that it is not the subject of any edit wars and that the content does not change significantly from day to day, reversions of vandalism and improvements based on suggestions not applying.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of good article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below and add GAnom to the nominated article. Please nominate in this format:
 * === Article name ===
 * Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/0 users/0 total)
 * 1) Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough at HP:Article name, which is the review page for the nominated article. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources)
 * 2) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied and vote support beneath the article's nomination

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy, which is at least one hundred (100) mainspace edits.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support the article on this page, or visit the nominee's review page to state your objections
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 6) To be a Good Article on Star Wars Fanon, a nomination must have at least eight (8) votes, of which at least four (4) must be contributed by High Priests. Articles will remain on the nominations track until they receive the required amount of votes or until the author pulls the nomination, but they need to be on the nominations track for at least one week even if they receive the required number of votes before then.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

High Priests, please be sure to place HP before each of your votes, to identify all High Priest votes.

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Gloaranian
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)


 * 1) I did all editing to make it qualified for the "good article" thing.-Endor chicken

Shizu Lanmaw
Objections and discussion – (4 High Priests/6 users/10 total)


 * 1) Let's go. --  CurrentBigThing  ( Speak ) 17:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Everything looks good now.  Nice article, and a good read.  Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 17:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Paragraphs are a bit short, but it looks fine by me otherwise. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 19:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Spell cheak finds no incorret grammer. Great article CBT. --Arav the Undersith (Contact Me ) (My contributions ) 11:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] iChat What I've done 06:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) It'll do. Unit 8311 10:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Looking good, hope to see this as an FA again someday.-- Nightmare975 10:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Much better. Keep it up and eventually get this FA again.  Wing   msg 16:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) I se n splleing errs. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 20:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) I vote aye Vagrant Lustoid (Talk) 23:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Hayai Oujou
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)


 * 1) I have read over the GA requirements and this article meets them all. There were enough images. Good read. --Arav the Undersith (Contact Me ) (My contributions ) 09:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Johun Othone
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)


 * 1) I tried my best to adhere to the Good Article Requirements  Anti-Formal  Come slang wit' me Work I've Put In 05:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Zeltron Osteoporosical Monoamine Gangliate
Objections and discussion – (1 High Priests/2 users/3 total)


 * 1) Second nomination. The name silliness has been toned down, and to anyone who thinks that the kill rate is unrealistic, I'd like to point out that Myxamatosis had a kill rate of 99%. Also, coupled the fact that is a virus designed to have a high kill rate, by a civilisation that can also create, I do not believe this article to be unrealistic in this respect. Unit 8311 12:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Unit makes a good point. Yes. --Arav the Undersith (Contact Me ) (My contributions ) 06:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) First off, I'd like to say no, Unit does not make a good point. That said, I have no objections to this article. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 20:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Dune
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/0 user/0 total)

Holy Cilwellian Empire
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)
 * 1) Yeah. I've taken care of all the complaints so far. Therefore, I don't feel that it's too arrogant to go ahead and support this article.

Ophuchi Sanctuary

 * Note: Although this article has received the required number of votes, it must remain on the nominations track until September 16th as per the nomination requirements.

Objections and discussion – (5 High Priests/3 user/8 total)


 * 1) Looks good. It is short, but everything's sourced. I have been assured the only grammatical quibble is being sorted out. &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Ask Archives [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|18px]] 01:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Put simply, it's a GA. --Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 06:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) There's a space in between a period and a source in the second paragraph in 'Layout'. That's all I can see.  Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 12:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Yeah.
 * 5) Will probably need expansion for FA, but otherwise it's good. Unit 8311 16:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) *I have no plans to make this an FA. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 16:59, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 17:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) It'll do fine. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 21:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) As three other High Priests have looked it over and not found any problems, I will assume that it is up to Good article standards which means I now feel comfortable voting on it. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea  <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 20:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)