Thread:Sebolto/@comment-104549-20200211013950/@comment-1998339-20200222135559

Sak & I discussed this in Chat previously, but what is our official stance on so-called "Property" tophat templates? I personally say we should permit only a single standardized template like Template:Property or the expanded one I've been working on that fits with the look of the other advisory templates. Presently, there are quite a few custom templates like this one floating around that clash with the aesthetic of the officially supported advisory templates.