Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Nominations

 This is the voting and review page for featured article nominations. Featured articles are articles on the Star Wars Fanon Wiki that represent the best that the wiki has to offer in the way of quality above that of general standards. Out of on this wiki, less than one hundred (100) are currently of featured status. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can and will be proposed for improvement or removal by the Council of Seers, the featured article and good article review board.

In order for an article to become featured, it must meet a set of requirements including, but not limited to, being of substantial length and detail while covering all possible encyclopedic angles. After it is nominated on this page, members of the Council of Seers and users will then review and vote on it to determine whether it is of featured article quality.

Do you need help writing a featured article? Feel free to read over our featured article tutorial to learn more. You can also visit the Writing Center's FA projects forum for interactive community help!

How to nominate:

In order to be considered for featured article status, an article must meet the featured article requirements written and determined by the community of the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. If an author then nominates their article for featured status, the Nominated template will be placed at the top of the nomination. Please nominate articles using the following format:


 * === Article name ===
 * Objections and discussion – (0 Council of Seers/0 users/0 total)

Using this format, only votes of approval will be placed on the featured article nominations page. All objections and comments will be placed onto the Council of Seers namespace page. If you are unsure as to how to set up the nomination's accompanying "CS" review page, feel free to check out the example review page we have provided for you.

How to vote:

Both the Council of Seers and general users may vote on featured article nominations. In order to vote, however, they must have the one hundred (100) mainspace/article edits required by the voting policy. Both Seers and voting users may review by adding comments, critique and feedback on the article, and they will then vote on whether or not the article is of featured article quality. Once at least four (4) members of the Council of Seers and at least three (3) other users, Seer or otherwise, have voted, an article will become featured. This means that an article needs at least seven (7) votes to pass. Seer votes are marked with the template.

If an article is nominated that is clearly not of featured article quality, the Council of Seers may reject its nomination. If an article is rejected, it will be added to the list of rejected nominations, and it may not again be nominated until one week later, giving it ample time to fix a rejected article. However, other Seers or community members hold the right to object to a rejected nominee, although only a consensus or vote may overturn the decision of the rejection.

Alternatively, the Seers may change a featured article nominee into a good article nominee instead, or vice-a-versa. However, if an author prefers to instead keep his/her article a good or featured nominee, he/she may do so and reject the change. This may not occur, though, if the article is being rejected without objections.

Please note that no article may become a featured article if there are still active legitimate objections on its review page. If a majority of Seers deem any objections to be nonsensical and/or of personal preference, and these objections are holding up the passing of a nomination, the objections will be struck out. This will only be done if the nonsensical and/or personal preference objections are holding up the nomination. Because of this, it is required that all users strike out their objections using once the nominator has sufficiently corrected them.

Approved articles:

If an article is voted as a featured article by the community and the Council of Seers, it will be added to the list of featured articles, the upcoming article queue, and to the history of featured articles. The Council of Seers namespace review page will be archived on the main Council of Seers page as well, and a star indicating that the article is featured will be placed in the era icons field on the new featured article.

If an article that is both a former good article and a former featured article upon its nomination on this page, it will be granted both good and featured article status if the nomination is successful.

Galactic Republic (ESW)
Objections and discussion - (3 Council of Seers/3 user/6 total)
 * 1) Excellent, nothing more to be said. -_- Joe  (Talk) (Contributions) (My novel) 17:44, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Objections struck.  I may run through it later with a copy-edit to tackle any leftover  problems.  But for now, adding my vote as anything else I may have had to object to were just personal preference.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:01, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Pretty good work...for now...  22:33, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Remember to avoid contractions. - Brandon Rhea  Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 02:46, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *Thank you for the heads up. I will be sure to be on the look out for that in the future.- I'm the Chosen One You must see it... 02:59, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Droid IRC [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|16px]] 18:07, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Wonderful work. It should easily make featured. -- SavageOpress1138  Help you I can, yes  16:43, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Belaham
This article still has objections, please do not remove from the nomination block!

Objections and discussion – (4 Seers/4 users/8 total)
 * 1) Well detailed, yet not painfully long. A hard thing to achieve in an article. -_- Joe  (Talk) (Contributions) (My novel) 19:58, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I went through it with a copy-edit and didn't find anything to object to that wasn't simply a  .  A nice, concise article.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:56, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) A well done article.-- Josh Bender Talk 03:02, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) It's good. -- D.W. (talk)(Glorior) 00:44, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Brandon Rhea  Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 23:24, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Being charitable in nature and realizing this needs one more vote to pass, I decided to give it the ol' college try.- I'm the Chosen One You must see it... 08:29, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) *The archiving of this article is currently hinging on Goodwood's objections. I'll need to double-check with him to see if they were met before I can call this one good.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:36, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **Right. I wasn't going to archive it anyway.
 * 9) ***Being the last person in the world who would want to stand in the way of a worthy FA seeing as same has been done to me, this really breaks my heart to say it: no, this article as it stands does not yet satisfy my objections. I would be ecstatic to be able to work personally with Bluethunder to further improve the article, however. 10:03, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Droid IRC [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|16px]] 18:07, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Droid IRC [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|16px]] 18:07, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Amber Solaris
Objections and discussion – (0 Council of Seers/1 users/1 total)
 * 1) &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Droid IRC [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|16px]] 18:11, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Acrolian Star Empire
Objections and discussion- (0 Seers/1 users/1 total)
 * 1) Well done. Perfect GA, and it is just a step away from becoming an FA. But a GFA achievement is even greater &mdash; TK-999  ISD-arrow.jpg(Comm channel) (Campaign of conquest) 19:36, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

Darth Ximus
Objection and discussion - (0 Council of Seers/1 users/1 total)
 * 1) Seeing as I wrote and nominated the article, I vote yes. --SavageOpress1138 (Talk) 13:40, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Tuffass
Objection and discussion - (3 Council of Seers/1 users/4 total)
 * 1) As co-author alongside Trak Nar.  07:42, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) A very well written and informative article. I really find that I get the perfect balance of storytelling and encyclopedia when I'm reading it.  It definitely deserves FA.  --SavageOpress1138 (Talk) 13:27, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Brandon Rhea  Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 06:57, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) A good article. -- D.W. (talk)(Glorior) 00:03, June 3, 2011 (UTC)