Thread:Sakaros/@comment-195.8.247.124-20190808134848/@comment-104549-20190814205455

Wow, well done! I appreciate your initiative and hard work. I've deleted the duplicative category.

"Images of" categories aren't bad in principle, though they're tragically underused; I can say fairly (if perhaps without modesty) that I'm one of the Wiki's experts on the Image and Categorization Policies, and even I almost never remember to categorize images. As a demonstrative example, Images of Jedi Knights only has 44 images, plus another 15 in the subcategories; I'm going to say at a guess that the Wiki has more than 59 images of Jedi Knights.

The Image Policy does say "All images should be properly categorized by source, subject, and type", and properly-licensed images do automatically have at least one category (e.g. Fair use images and Copyrighted images). Since categorization by subjects is done so rarely, going through on an enforcement binge would be less like "killing a few non-compliant images" and more like "genocide"; additionally, there aren't always categories applicable to images. That said, I may include a note in my future Image Policy messages on the subject.