Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Per the majority opinion of the High Priests, due to the High Priests not being as overwhelmed with nominations as they were in the past, we will now be accepting TEN nominations per round but no more than ten. This is subject to change in the coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 7) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page showcase box.
 * 8) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled, even if they are stubs.
 * 9) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 10) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Characteristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) If there are already five nominees on the page, you may not nominate anymore. If more than five nominees are posted, anything after the fifth nominee will be removed.
 * 5) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Xendor Taral (3)
 * 2) Vujaara dragon (2)

=Nominations=

Support

 * 1) Per last week's justification. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per above and before. - Brandon Rhea 04:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I wrote this article tonight and, when I finished it, I immediately loved it, mainly because of the pictures that go along with it and the Star Wars lore I was able to throw into it. For those that are probably thinking it's too short, I did a word count and it's longer than Jasca's CABAL article, which is already a GA, and I believe it has been expanded since it was nominated for FA. Basically, my point is that I hope people are not going to judge this on length but rather quality. - Brandon Rhea 04:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per above. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good job, good article. Easy to read because of the length and still had a good story. Kinda came outta left field though. Dexington 14:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)