Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-1998339-20180623130927

Hey man! I'd like to get your opinion on something. Earlier this year, I rewrote one of my Featured Articles, Azarac (formerly Acrolis), to reflect some changes I've made to my evolving fanon continuity. I'm currently in the process of rewriting it again. The world's description, history, & culture have changed substantially since the article achieved FA status in 2011. Though the general setting remains the same (i.e., single small planet & single moon in asteroid-heavy system inhabited by xenophobic near-Human species known for restricting outsiders to moon), the details have changed in my efforts to make the narrative more realistic & more grounded in EU lore. I've since been grappling with a.

Should the article in its evolved state still hold Featured status despite possessing few of the original details, sentences, & word choices approved by the voting community seven years ago? Should I revert back to the approved version & move the new material to a separate article? The FA requirements state that the "article does not need to have a finished storyline," but I don't think they had complete rewrites in mind when they included that line. I have attempted to follow the FA requirements in the course of rewriting to ensure that the article remains worthy of Featured status. However, I almost feel like I'm bypassing the will of the community by claiming FA status for an article that bears only cursory similarities to the original. Thanks in advance for your counsel! (: 