Star Wars Fanon:Request for Archivistship/Archive/Fiolli

Support

 * 1) I could write a long and detailed post describing all of Fiolli's accomplishments because they speak for themselves. He's been an Inquisitor on Wookieepedia (kinda like Seers but focused only on FA) and penned multiple FAs over there. He's written two novels and several short stories. The works of his that I've read are all FW worthy. He's a polished writer with a gift for storytelling and he knows his writing. He's also a likeable, humble chap who has done nothing but good around here. It's with great pleasure that I can say I've obtained his permission for this nomination. Signed, Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 02:59, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Brandon Rhea (talk)  03:06, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) This is a guy I could definitely work with. I only wish he'd take a look at my stuff sometimes and see where they could be improved. It's so boring having only Ataru to talk to...heh heh heh... 04:40, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Goodwood so ronery  Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 04:52, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Without a doubt. -- Wylind (talk)(narratives) 06:39, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Indeed. --  JM  76  Comm 06:40, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Fiolli is a good dude for the job, even if we may be piling on even more work to his workload. Based on active archivists, we/they can finally CORRECTLY adhere to the voting stipulations. :P - I'm the Chosen One  08:19, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Karohalva (Talk) 04:47, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9)  Trak Nar  Ramble on 04:49, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I'm sorry, but I have to vote against this. Ataru's points are all good, and I have nothing but praise for Fiolli's works. I would love nothing more than to have three active Archivists, but that's just the thing. As far as I can see, Fiolli has never reviewed a FWN. I am absolutely not saying Fiolli should never be an Archivist. However, I feel he needs to start of by reviewing them as an actual user first, and then once he's made a couple of quality reviews, I will be more than happy to support a nomination for Archivistship.  Savage  1138  15:48, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Savage, I agree that doing a number of quality reviews should be a prerequisite to Archivistship. --' DK Wolf 27 ' JaingHead.svg  Holonet Channel  18:40, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree with Savage. We expect the same from Seers.-- Josh Bender щ(ﾟДﾟщ) 19:15, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * I respect Savage's prerogative to vote as he pleases, but so it's known, a bit of research reveals that the only person who ever voted on FWN reviews prior to becoming an Archivist is me. And since I came up with the idea for FWs in the first place, that's sort of uh, expected. If we were to apply the "must be active on the FWN page prior to this nom" standard to everyone, I'd be the only Archivist. Which would suck. So yeah. Just throwing that out there.  Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 16:11, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm going to respond, but just so that it doesn't look like I'm ignoring you. I really don't want to get into a big debate or anything. As far as I'm concerned, I wouldn't have voted for any of those Archivist nominations. I would have objected with the same reason I have here. As it is, I wasn't there, and my vote will not be changing. If Fiolli does start reviewing FWNs, and they are of good enough quality (which if he does start reviewing I think they probably would be), then I will happily change my vote. I think Archivistship should come because a user gives lots of quality reviews, not the other way around.  Savage  1138  17:36, January 11, 2012 (UTC)