User talk:Aeods

Titles

 * Hey Alex, you are making some of the articles wrong, like the one about the Empresses, you aren't suppost to put the title of the character in the title of the article. You have to just put the character's name and leave out the title. Same with the Grand Masters, like for Abba, put only Abba Regana and not Grand Master Abba Regana. User:Darth Matas

Darth

 * Darth is more of an honourific name than an actual title. That is why all the Sith are known as Darth Maul, Darth Abeonis, Darth whatever. But titles like Empress, Emperor and Grand Master are not. If they are used in the article's title, people will remove them. SO it's best not to put them in anyways. [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 21:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Featured articles

 * This is a message to inform you to tell your friend, Dork of Mordork (or whoever is using that IP address), that their votes will NOT count unless they have made contributions to Star Wars Fanon (which they have not). So please remember this for future reference, and that is the reason why I removed his votes from the nominatios page.


 * Because it's unfair to other nominations and users. If that were the case (anyone could vote regardless if they have ZERO contributions) then I could simply tell all my friends who have internet access to go to SWFanon, register, and vote in whatever I want them to vote. Is that fair? No. And FYI, just tell your friend Brian that all he has to do is make ONE contribution (by contribution I mean article) that has meaning to it. For example, for the user Imperialles to vote in the Sysop election, he created a single article, Imperialles (namesake), to vote. That's all Brian has to do.


 * You can still make contributions. AND if that is a problem, simply click the "Remember Me" where he signs in, and make an article. Even if it's under HIS IP, then that's fine as long as its confirmed HE is making the contribution (articles).

The battle of Vuur won the week before. It was Jasca's Darth Hiljo that won yesterday.

If that is the case, shouldn't all of Darth Tader's votes in the admin poll be disqualified since they're all from his friends? And just because someone says "Great promise and nicely done and organized" it doesn't mean that's what it is. THe majority of the votes Xander Vos had were from your friends. And in the end, sadly, I dont take charge of managing what does/doesnt become an FA. Talk to Jasca about that - what we all need to do is have an IRC meeting and meet a consensus and how articles will be selected as FAs.... (Talk)

"Telling on me" on Brandon Rhea's talk page...
Running to others for help, Aeods? Hmph. VERY MATURE. I think you and I should settle this together. Jump on the IRC so we can settle this. (Talk)

We don't need a reputation (The DL). And you taking continuous shots at my "maturity" level isn't quite mature. As for the IRC, follow this link, put swfanon, and enter your username then login. (Talk)

Okay, chill the hell out
You guys both need to chill out. I read what was said on my talk page (it was still under "Difference between revisions") and while I will not comment on the specific things said between the two of you, I will say that the idea of the Decreton Lords is a good one that is horribly executed. Three out of five of the DLs have shown incredibly immaturity on countless occasions, whether it be arguing during the actual nomination process or referring to articles as "crap" or "hahahaha, no" in the DL talk space. I do believe that the DL either needs to be done away with or re-worked, because right now it's being horribly done. - Brandon Rhea 03:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Bury the hatchet?

 * Hey man, I wanted to apologize on all the hostilities we had toward each other a few days ago. It was nothing personal, I was just defending my article, as you were yours.  No hard feelings?
 * Thanks.