Star Wars Fanon:User of the Month/Archive/November 2009

This is an archive of the votes obtained by the winner of User of the Month for November 2009.

Support

 * 1) After some careful consideration, I’ve decided to nominate and throw my support behind Wylind to be the next User of the Month. Let me preface this by saying that, initially, I wasn’t going to support him. Why? This forum, which can basically be described as a temper tantrum. But let’s face it. If one stupid thing is going to disqualify someone from receiving an award, I’d be disqualified from everything forever. Besides, there were good intentions in that forum, because he really wants to see this wiki thrive. He’s not just all talk, though. He’s pushing and actively participating in FanonProject. He’s doing simple things like voting for FAs, GAs, QOTWs, and proposals. He’s proposing things for the community on his own. He’s even going so far as to personally welcome newly registered users on their talk page. That’s just over the top, man, but over the top is what UOTM is for. After all, look at our last few UOTMs: Antonstaen, JM76, Michael, Vic, and Nacen. You can go straight to hell if you're going to accuse...well, you know the rest. The fact is, Wylind does a lot of good work here and is very helpful, all while receiving very little recognition for it. The best part about that, though, is the fact that he’s not asking for it. He’s not prancing around with passive aggressive suggestions that he should be nominated, unlike some people. This nomination is coming because he deserves it, not because he asked for it. He may not even want it considering comments he’s made recently, but I strongly advise him to accept it. He deserves it. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 03:15, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) He had my vote last time, but I was almost about to oppose this. However, he has appeared to have grown up since that "incident" so I will back him once again.-- Josh Bender Talk 19:53, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Nacen (Talk) 02:09, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) You can go straight to hell if you're going to accuse… well, you know the rest. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 01:03, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) * Wow. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  01:06, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hit, knock, bang, strike, smack, wallop, bash, collide with, etc. --Undersith (IT"S A TRAP! ) (Sith Happens ) 12:26, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Comments
Bumping this onto the recent changes list since it's been up for nine days and no one has voted. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 19:49, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Another BUMP. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  22:59, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

Mine was fine. Yours was shameless. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 23:08, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * . --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  00:09, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

One, last bump. -- (Conference Room)  02:28, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, this bump was unnecessary.-- Josh Bender Talk 02:32, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Ok seriously, don't bump your own nomination. My last comment may have been in jest, but it really is shameless. If there's only four votes, there's only four votes. It's not going to prevent you from becoming UOTM. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 02:33, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, fine. Just compared to last month, hardly anybody voted. If it's because they don't want to vote for me, I obviously understand. But, if it's because they're unaware a new nomination has been posted, then that's why I'm doing this. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  02:36, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

If they're unaware then that's their problem. It's already been bumped twice before this. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 02:37, October 31, 2009 (UTC)