Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-104549-20190618001352/@comment-104549-20190628190656

The only change that springs to my mind is parallel construction in the titles (and yes, I realize that I'm the one who drafted the initial language; I suck). The template is a request for feedback ("Hey, please do this for me if you have time"), the category is need for feedback ("Hey, you! This story is terrible; you should tell the author!"). Given that those were my default reads on the diction when I actually saw them implemented, I'd go with "Category:Articles requesting feedback". Not married to the language, though; Sav?

A broader policy question emerges here: do we want to open this to all articles (fanon and fan-fiction), or just fan-fiction? On the one hand, the issue only arose in regards to fan-fiction; on the other hand, offhand I can't think of a logical reason fanon couldn't be roped in too.

Per Sebolto's technical analysis here, I think another rail module is the way to go.

Incidentally, lest it be lost in the scuffle, this is all excellent work, Sebolto. When Sav ascends to the great literary salon in the sky and I at long last assume my predestined Bureaucratic throne Someday I want you to be an admin.