Thread:AtlantisUchiha/@comment-3528596-20170811142145/@comment-3528596-20170811152825

UNSC first: you're right that the article doesn't mention Star Wars stuff, and that's not great. However, it should be taken in the greater context of the author's works. In this case, that's the Orion War article&mdash;as determined by the "What links here" function. I don't understand your question about The Clone Wars though. Could you clarify?

My point about AtlantisUchiha's Article is that the template itself doesn't change the ownership and/or permissions related to the article. The Editing policy covers who can and can't edit the article. Specifically, any user can:


 * Categorizing the page.
 * Correcting spelling.
 * Correcting grammar.
 * Reverting vandalism or spam.
 * Organizing or correcting the page to conform to the wikia’s policies.

Without your permission, no one can "add, remove, or change story details" of your article. However, everything you post to Wikia/FANDOM is licensed under Creative Commons. I'm not a legal expert, so my knowledge of the specifics of the licensing is limited, but my understanding is that anyone can re-use or re-distribute the content freely as long as they give attribution credit. Thus, words like "own" and "property" are tricky here. As far as Star Wars Fanon is concerned, nobody can "outright alter the entire article" etc., but, legally, you don't "own" the content. Does that help clarify the situation? The ultimate point is that the template at the top of the article isn't changing anything. Whether that is there or not, the Editing policy and Wikia licensing still apply.