Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-104549-20151215121224/@comment-104549-20151216024014

Rereading the SoulCalibur deletion discussion, it seems like there are two rationales for allowing those articles to stay:
 * 1) "I hate Babylon8" and, more relevantly,
 * 2) Licensed crossover with character interaction

As such, I think the reasoning there reaches beyond just SoulCalibur and could, in theory, apply to other non-canonical/Legendary crossovers. In other words, it's a two-part test: It's a conjunctive test—both elements must be met in order to qualify for the exception. With that understanding, I don't think the "SoulCalibur Exception" embraces the Transformers toy line. The toy line meets the first part of the test, but not the second.
 * 1) Is the appearance of Star Wars characters outside canonical/Legendary media officially licensed by Disney/Lucasfilm?
 * 2) If so, do Star Wars characters interact with canonical characters of other universes (implied there and explicitly stated by Brandon here)?

In sum, I concur in part and dissent in part. I agree that the SoulCalibur Exception doesn't permit the articles in the instant case, but I think the SoulCalibur Exception goes beyond permitting those specific articles to continue to exist.