Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-104549-20160305012836/@comment-3528596-20160309211415

Prefacing this again with the fact that I appreciate the vast majority of the policy simplification, I have a few problems with your argument.


 * 1) I don't think it's particularly relevant that it isn't in the terms of use. If Wikia says "no" to something, we can't say "yes", but just because Wikia says "yes" doesn't mean SWF can't have in house rules against it.
 * I, personally, don't agree with the argument "it hasn't been a problem, therefore we don't need a rule" alone. It's the crux of your argument, and I don't think that's a good enough single reason. I agree it hasn't really been a problem. However, we again get into the question of whether the policy is a deterrent or not. I don't know.
 * 1) Lastly&mdash;again no offense personally&mdash;I'm not sure I agree with your unilateral decision to purposefully alter the policy without community consent. I could be wrong, but I bet if there was a vote on this more people would vote to keep the "no multiple accounts". Arguments might range from the simplistic "that's how it has always been" to a more constructed "for the sake of clarity of identity and simplicity of wiki maintenance", but I think that's still the community consensus. Making a policy altering change like that without any clear consensus or even highlighting of the change (as far as I could find) seems sketchy to me.