Thread:Sebolto/@comment-104549-20200211013950/@comment-104549-20200216172228

Yay for democracy! And thanks for the various reshufflings, Seb. I definitely think it's valuable to keep the Article Guidelines; the MOS is critical for quality control, but might be daunting for new users, where the AG is more contained and hits the key points. I think Bac had the right impulse, he just executed it the wrong way.

To Seb's other points:
 * I don't follow the discussion of things only appearing in plural form, and I can't find a relevant mention on the . What do you mean?
 * I strongly concur with Sav's views against any suggestion that Canon is the "normal" or "default" setting; many fans have very strong feelings against the Canon material, and, for what it's worth, two of the more prolific writers this last year (MPK and myself) have series that have a testy, standoffish relationship with Canon on the best days. A mention of the continuity system is worthwhile; defaulting to it seems pushy.
 * I dropped a Main Article connector to the Wookieepedia and Legends templates. I confess I don't understand the point of   in light of  ; it's an older code, and it checks out, but what's the value added?
 * I think I might support reinstatement of bold headings; it becomes especially important as the subheadings become more sub and consequently get smaller . Sav?
 * I think differences on capitalization is getting too tolerant of the Canon/Legends divide; I prefer a universal rule for the entire Wiki, especially since some works mix-and-match Canon and Legends. I vote in favor of always capitalizing "Human" (and "Near-Human").
 * I'm not sure whether the MOS or the Categorization Policy page is a better place for that discussion of Sith Lord titles. Anyone have a strong feeling?
 * Tweaked the Newarticletext accordingly.