Thread:KanashimiUchiha2/@comment-1998339-20190520095044/@comment-1998339-20190520204907

The ones we use are identical to those on by design. Per the Layout Policy, we require articles to maintain some semblance of visual consistency through the use of shared elements like standardized infoboxes, headers, era/continuity templates, etc. Additionally, as stated above, your template is not mobile friendly due to being a parser function-enhanced wikitable. To make browsing pleasant for our mobile readers, we use PIs exclusively for all of our major templates (& those legacy holdover infoboxes that aren't yet PIs are always being converted on an ongoing basis).

So in short, per the Layout Policy & our interest in being mobile-friendly, I'm afraid I'm going to have to decline. Our infoboxes are perfectly sufficient in this context, though you are always welcome to style them to your preferences in your personal CSS.