Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-1998339-20180623130927/@comment-104549-20180623151115

An intriguing question. To add info to inform the decision, there once was a formal process for FA status. Apparently the Council of Seers would periodically review previously-approved FAs, and could revoke FA status by majority vote. But the Council was disbanded in 2013, and I'm not sure the revocation authority ever clearly devolved on anyone else.

Ordinarily I'd say "power abandoned by the governing devolves upon the governed, whence it springs", and if nobody complains, then no action need be taken on the articles' status. But as Star Wars Fanon is not a democracy, but rather a Wikiacracy, power really springs from FANDOM, bubbling up to the spring that is the Bureaucrat to thence pour forth into the pool of the admin team before flowing out to the users. Sav, of course, is famous for ensuring a healthy flow of power to the users, so I suppose it depends, Boss—who do you want making decisions like this?