Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best the Star Wars Fanon Wiki has to offer.

What makes a featured article or what article should you nominate to feature? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;a Good article.
 * 2) &hellip;be well written and detailed.
 * 3) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 4) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 5) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 6) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 7) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination
 * 8) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 9) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links; use common sense (no more then ten)
 * 10) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 2 or more supports than any other article and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!!

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Current Standings
These standings are determined by who has the most votes. This may, however, not be the way the winner is determined. Also, oppositions will lower the amount of votes you have, as long as they're for a good reason. Neutral does nothing.


 * Battle of Vuur, E.C.H.O. Visor (1)
 * Abigaile Jade Kenobi, Xander Vos (0)
 * Dual Possessed, Battle of Ruusan (-1)
 * New Confederacy of Independant Systems, Stick Figure Empire (-2)

=Nominations=

Support

 * I think your profile is great. Very detailed, and you have some good fanfics to back it up. Your backround is nice, with the ties to Quinlan Vos. Not much I'd change, it's good from what I see. - Dork of Mordork

Neutral

 * Few things. First, there are way too many red links. From what I can tell, there are 21 of them. The guidelines for FA status say no more than 10, but in my opinion 21 is 21 too many. Also, you have zero pictures there, even lacking one in the info box. You MUST have pictures in order for it to be an FA. The statistics box below the info box should also be removed, as it is unncessary. I won't oppose this, as the things I have mentioned are easily fixable. - Brandon Rhea 15:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * The reason there were so many red links was because they linked to pages of people who hadn't made pages for their characters yet. I've made them now, so there are a lot less red links (seven I think). All objects or events have links to pages. I've added four pictures, but I'm waiting out on a drawing that a friend is doing of Xander to put as his main picture.aeods 11:00, 9 April 2007

Support

 * The only problems I really see are a lack of links and the "Notes" section, which I believe could simply be added into the article, but that's not enough to keep me from supporting the article. - Brandon Rhea 14:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I too am going to "stretch" it. This is the only battle I put my best effort into, and I think it came out rather nicely. It should be a decent article at least (I think so) and even though it's short, I still think it's FA material. I hope you all like it. PS: I won't be voting for my own article, so it has a fair shot at winning and losing.
 * Now that I think about it, this could do with one more picture, speciffically in Prelude. - Brandon Rhea 17:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I added 2 new pics; one in the prelude and one in the aftermath. Tell me what you think.
 * Looks cool. However, one problem is that the picture where Zeri fights off the Mandalorians cuts off some text above it. You might want to resize that picture. - Brandon Rhea 22:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have a question, I know it may be much to ask of you, but can you please take a screenshot of what you see? On mine, the picture seems fine.

Neutral

 * It's rather short and it only contains one picture. I'm not sure about this one yet. - Brandon Rhea 00:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I will not vote for this article until it has gone under the rest of the Decreton Lord's review.

Oppose

 * Needs some fixing up.

Neutral

 * I'm going to be honest: I really don't think it's all that good. It has potential, but in it's current state I do not feel that it's worthy of FA status. It's short, it lacks detail, the aftermath section is a sentence long, the pictures are at the bottom of the page with no text and the intro seems like it should be a seperate "Precursor to Battle" section within the history rather than an intro, which should really (in my opinion) be a summary of the entire article. It has potential, so therefore I won't oppose it outright, but it's definately not worthy of FA status in it's current state. - Brandon Rhea 03:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I will not vote for this article until it has gone under DL review.
 * Thanks for the ideas, guys. Will be fixing it up today.

Oppose

 * No, definately not. For starters, saying "I know it needs work" is not a good way of going about nominating an article for FA status, as it tells everyone that it's not done. Now, for what needs work. First, the history is incredibly short. You really didn't say how the NCIS came about, nor did you mention any battles it was in or anything else of the like. How did it capture Geonosis and Dantooine? How did it capture parts of Coruscant without the New Republic forcing them off? What about the Government and Politics of the NCIS? The intro tells us really nothing about the NICS other than it succeed the CIS. You need to answer Who, What, When, Where, Why and How in the intro. Detail is key when writing it. How about Appearances or Behind the Scenes? What I really don't like about this article though is that the Members, Capitol Ships and Support Ships sections make up at least 3/4 of the article. What would be better is if you took all of that and put it in a new page, perhaps something like "New Confederacy Military" or something of the sort. Along with all of that, I just feel that the proper amount of effort was not put into this, considering 3/4 of it is simply a list of links to Wookieepedia. This DEFINATELY seems like something that could be an FA in the future. It just needs a lot of work first. - Brandon Rhea 01:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) About 3/4 of the article is just a list of capital ships, members, and support ships. Definately not aa good featured article, or even a good article.

Comments

 * I put alot of hard work into this and I know it needs a little work but it is still a good article. Troyb 20:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Although not entirely finished and detailed, and also short, a pretty good article with a good idea and story.

Oppose

 * 1) Although not entirely finished and detailed - Though I did take a look at the article, the very fact that you said that made me immediately say "no" even before looking at the article. I will never understand why people nominated articles that are not finished. - Brandon Rhea 23:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Brandon pretty much summed it up.

Oppose

 * 1) Troyb 22:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Nope. It starts with five redlinks, which is not a good thing to start with. It has no images whatsoever. It’s not detailed, especially the “Government” section which really doesn’t have anything in it other than a few sentences and a list, and 1/3 of the article is a list. It does not really have a sufficiently detailed lead. There is no history section, and all Empires have a history. Also, what kind of economy does the Empire have? What is its society and culture like? What planets does it control? Do you have behind the scenes work? Has it appeared in any fan fiction or fan films or anything of the sort? What era did it exist in? You will also want to place your article into a category(s). So, I hope that you’ll take the time to finish this article up, but right now it’s simply not FA material. - Brandon Rhea 23:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

209.169.73.9 01:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
i have added a lot more content to every section of my article, gotten rid of the red links, and have a picture ready to scan tommorrow. It has not been entered in any fan fiction, but i do have something i am working on. Still Thinking about the behind the scenes. History will be added shortly. Economy is an Imperial Communism, and i have yet to add a section on economy. Not sure what to put for culture.

Thanks for your thoughts and constructive critiscsms.

Support

 * 1) It's one my favorite (and only) articles. I always enjoy reading it. Xepeyon 02:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment

 * It's not the longest article, but I think it covers all the bases of what it needs to. No red links, overview, and a behind the scenes.
 * It needs a longer intro paragraph. - Brandon Rhea 03:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * Few things. First, the intro paragraph is still rather short. Second, surely things happened in his early life to constitute more than three sentences, yes? The Modal Nodes and the Becoming a Jedi sections also a lacking in detail. I would also reccomend organizing the pictures a bit better, as well as adding a few more. I'd also like to see the Post-Mortem section spurced up. Fr example, why was Yoda saddened by the death? Why didn't Yoda's spirit come back after the death? - Brandon Rhea 05:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I have improved this article a good deal since it was first nominated. Like NKSCF I will not vote for this article until it has gone under DL review.  Pinky  Talk  05:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)