Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip; be identified with proper era icons.
 * 2) &hellip; be well written, comprehensive and detailed; however, not to the extent of the requirement for a Featured Article.
 * 3) To be well written, the article must have a prose that is engaging and of a professional standard.
 * 4) To be detailed, an article must be written in an encyclopedic format with no point of view in the detail, though that detail is not excess nor irrelevant; instead, the detail must also contact all relevant major facts and plot points.
 * 5) The article must acknowledge and explore all aspects of the subject and cover every encyclopedic angle.
 * 6) The article does not need to have a finished storyline.
 * 7) The article must be clear, using a logical structure written in plain language.
 * 8) The article must follow standard writing conventions of modern English (ie, correct grammar, punctuation and spelling).
 * 9) All grammar and spelling must be one hundred percent accurate. The High Priests and voting members of the community will inspect all of it to make proper edits.
 * 10) &hellip; have an introduction of at least one-hundred and fifty (150) words that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the greater detail in the following sections.
 * 11) &hellip; follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, categorization policy, as well as all other policies.
 * 12) &hellip; contain enough images where appropriate, but the page is not cluttered or overstocked.
 * 13) &hellip; ensure that all images in said article follow the standards of sourcing in the Image policy.
 * 14) &hellip; not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination.
 * 15) &hellip; have absolutely no red links, as they must be filled with at least stubs or not be linked to at all.
 * 16) &hellip; have no links in section titles.
 * 17) &hellip; have a brief "Personality and traits" section that generalizes the character's said personality
 * 18) &hellip; be stable, meaning that it is not the subject of any edit wars and that the content does not change significantly from day to day, reversions of vandalism and improvements based on suggestions not applying.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article. Please nominate in this format:
 * ===Article name ===
 * ====Support====
 * ====Oppose====
 * ====Neutral/comments====
 * 1) Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 2) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 3) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Annikin Skywalker (4)
 * 2) Zeltron Osteoporosical Monoamine Gangliate (0)
 * 3) White Star Pirates (-1)
 * 4) Sela Kerroro (-2)

Support

 * 1) Been working hard on this. Think it meets the new requirements. Unit 8311 14:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Actually, there is reason to vote against this. The article fails rule #6, as all of your images fail the sourcing requirements in the Image Policy. While they're not at risk for being deleted because they were uploaded before the new policy was in place, they must be properly sourced for this to be a Good Article. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 20:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sourcing? Bah, I thought that sort of thing was for Wookieepedia. Anyway, job done. I'm sure you'll agree that this is now up to standards, no matter how many silly acronyms it contains. Unit 8311 17:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The Image Policy also states that a description of the image is required on the Information template. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 17:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) **Done that too. Unit 8311 17:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, changed my mind. Honestly, does no one use a spell checker any more? I'm not going to list where these mistakes are; call it punishment for not bothering to spell check. Here are the mistakes:
 * 1) *painful and slow death that beings who were infected with it had should be changed to painful #and slow death that victims who became infected by it had.
 * 2) *mishapen should be spelt misshapen
 * 3) *shriveled should be spelt shrivelled
 * 4) *canceled should be cancelled (this error appears twice)
 * 5) *favor should be favour
 * 6) *veteod is spelt vetoed
 * 7) *demonstation to demonstration
 * 8) *Quaratin to quarantine
 * 9) *Nontheless, to none the less
 * 10) *orang to orange
 * 11) *euthanised to euthanized
 * 12) *Repbulic to republic
 * 13) *annhiliate to annihilate
 * 14) *cyrogenically to cryogenically
 * Please, please please use a spell checker! [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 18:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Tom, some of your corrections there are wrong. Favor/favour doesn't matter, because Favor is the American spelling. Republic should remain capitalized since it is the proper name of an organization. If it was just referring to a generic republic, then I would agree with you. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 18:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Done all that. Also, 'orang' is deliberate because I made it up. Unit 8311 18:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) *Brandon, about the Repblic thing, the changing of the capital was a mistake, but, if you look at the first spelling of the word it was Repblic, not Republic, so a spelling mistake. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 19:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Sorry, but Vic is right. Though unlike him, I am actually voting against this. It is too Mary Sueish, as Vic put it. Darthfuzzball 20:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * My better judgment wants me to vote against this just for the name alone, but I'm just going to refrain from voting at all. -MPK 17:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm also voting neutral on this. Let's go with the phrase "too silly". - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom) (Record) 17:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * While not a fan of the images, that's no reason to not vote. However, I will agree with Brandon; too silly and too... strange. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 17:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Aw come on, there's plenty of silly and strange stuff that's made FA already. Besides, the only people liable to get the name are hardcore internet nerds like us. Unit 8311 17:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Irrelevant, I'll abstain from voting for the time being. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 18:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * "ZOMG...it's....ZOMG!" God, that's a lame quote. This article is way too silly. --Victor Dorantes (discussion) (contributions) 18:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Changed that quote. But seriously Vic, the article isn't that silly. There's only the name, and maybe one or two quote, and the rest is silly in the same way that a nuclear holocaust is silly. Unit 8311 18:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it's silly because I didn't know (until now) that Mary-Sue diseases could exist. --Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 18:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * A mary sue disease...that phrase made me chuckle...anyway, perhaps you should see this if you think this article's a 'mary sue disease'. By Star Wars standards, this is a perfectly realistic thing. Unit 8311 18:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, because everyone in the world is dead right. "Chances of population survival: 0%." Stupid article. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 18:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, that's your opinion. I'm not going to say any more to avoid a flame war, but let's face it, a fatal artificial disease that kills populations is perfectly understandable in a universe where people have the technology to create FTL travel, energy weapons, and intelligent droids, no? Unit 8311 19:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * To a degree, yes, you are correct. But the Spanish flu killed up to 20% of the infected, rather than 100%. You could rise the survival rate (lower the death rate, whatever). That's what so implausible, especially since Imperial manufactured it and didn't get it themselves. If you just removed the acronym, this article would've been taken far more seriously, too. But that's not even the major problem as I said. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 19:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmmm.. I'm not going to support this article just yet, but I won't oppose it, either. Not trying to scold your idea, but you might want to rewrite some of the article's elements. It feels like an article (especially with that former ZOMG...it's....ZOMG quote) that's trying to be serious yet has lack toleratable realism at the same time. I mean, with the death rate being 90% and the chances of survival 0.1%? You literally have a better chance of surviving being shot in the head at point-blank range. Just try to re-evaluate some of the elements, particularly the statistics, to make it seem more real&mdash;not real as in the actual real world, but real as in more easily believed in a general sense.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|45px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Been working hard on this for a long time. I think it is finally good enough. Sorry, Unit 8311, I couldn't let you win without any opposition. Darthfuzzball 17:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Spelling and grammar errors are as follows:
 * 2) *In the introduction, a very feared pirate organization should be changed to a much feared pirate organization, for grammatical correctness.
 * 3) *In the introduction, the word 'dots' should be changed to circles.
 * 4) *In the Growth of an army section, you put organiation, rather than organization.
 * 5) *In that same section you put confict rather than conflict.
 * 6) *Same section, honor rather than honour.
 * 7) *In the downfall of Orion Forte section, it should be changed from: was on his way to Ris'danon, the last thing he was expecting was a Jedi. Especially not one as powerful as the one that was sent. To was on his way to Ris'danon, the last thing he was expecting was a Jedi and especially not one as powerful as the one that was sent.
 * 8) *Force sensitives should be changed to force sensitive's, in same section.
 * 9) *In the Struggle back to power and final destruction section, unimportantness should be changed to lack of importance.
 * And that's all I found. Needed to have been put through a spell checker before nomination. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 17:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) *I changed most of that stuff, but 'honor' is the correct spelling and Force should be capitalized. Darthfuzzball 19:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) **Not only that, but it's "Force sensitives" without the apostrophe. And tom, please remember that we also use United States English, not only Brit English. Removed the now-invalid opposition. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 19:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Wow, that was fast, Vic. I congratulate you on your efficiency Darthfuzzball 19:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) *Vic, I realise this site uses American english, but I was just quoting what came out of my spell check-er, on the US setting. It may be, as it's English, faulty with US, and I don't have, unfortunately, a US ground to base it on, so I can't always rectify it myself. Sorry. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 06:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) **Then don't depend on your spell checker if it sucks. kthxbi. Oh yeah, and please format comment correctly, with a hash sign in front of comments, follow by an asterisk to keep the numbers in order (if it's not a vote in the voting section). --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 23:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Alright, I looked through this today, and I'm highly bothered by some of the layout on this article. It's mess:
 * 7) *In the infobox, under "headquarters" you put the following: "Travelling organization——had no real established headquarters except for training sites" First off, traveling is misspelled. It's only one "L". Secondly, you do not need to put that in the infobox. Instead, just put "traveling organization" or "nomadic organization" or instead, list the training sites. The infobox is for one or two word descriptions, such as birth date and whatever, not for sentences.
 * 8) *Also in the infobox, under locations, you put "A couple of small cities on Corellia". Instead, put " Corellian cities (trust me, putting a letter after a link adds it to the link. So the link will appear as Corellian rather than just Corellia.)
 * 9) *Lastly in the infobox, please do not put what you did under affiliation. Just put "None", simple as that, or "independent" or "self". Nothing more is needed.
 * 10) *Now, from the introduction: "white star representing the main world on which the pirates were first formed (Corellia)" Instead of putting Corellia in parenthesis, put it in between commas.
 * 11) *Later, in the first section: "decided to form a large pirate group which had the goal of conquering the galaxy (or at least a part of it)" Same thing. Put commas rather than parenthesis. We never really should use parenthesis in an article.
 * 12) *In the section " Growth of territory", you have a bunch of small sections talking about individual planets. Still talk about those planets (duh), but instead remove the needless section headers, keeping all the information under " Growth of territory", as one section. That way, you don't have short sections but you still will have all of the information we need.
 * 13) *Under "Downfall of Orion Forte", your second paragraph is enormous. Please break it down into two or even three paragraphs, to smooth out the section and the article as a whole. Also, remove the second link to "Ris'danon" since you don't need to link to it twice.
 * 14) *Under the same section, you link to White Star again. Remove it, since you already linked to it earlier in the article.
 * 15) *In "Struggle back to power and final destruction" section, the first paragraph is a bit on the bulky side, so please split it into two paragraphs.
 * 16) *The "Legacy" section should be part of the history, so please make it a section three header rather than a section two (which means === rather than == ). Also in the Legacy, please do not bold White Star Pirates, just remove it. It's already bolded in the introduction, and only one bolding (usually) is needed in the whole article.
 * 17) *Under "The Military", please change it to "Military" by itself. "The" is redundant.
 * 18) *Under the same section, please spell out "50 years later" (as fifty years later)
 * 19) *Under the same section under "Organization of forces", it is a bit excess. What I mean is you have like three of these "———" after each part, which is needless and annoying. Please remove them, and instead put only one. Also, do not bold the words (such as Grand Army, Legion, Regiment, etc) because like I said above, it's unnecessary.
 * 20) *For both "Sources" and "Appearances", please put an asterisk (*) before each of the books or whatever they are, to make them into a list.
 * 21) **That's pretty much it, once you do that, I can support this. There were a few sentencing formats that I would've liked to see different, because (very few) sentences appear choppy, like "The White Star Pirates struggled" which could be part of a whole 'nother sentence, but it's no big deal. I just get irritated with improperly formatted stuff, which is why I pointed all of this out. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 23:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 22) Per Vic, but once you clean those things up (assuming you do by tonight), I'll support.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|45px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * Ah, come on! You guys make comments on his but not mine? Sorry for being so impatient [[Image:Tongue.gif]] Darthfuzzball 17:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I haven't gotten a chance to look at yours yet. - <font color="#1A2BBB">President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(Pressroom) <font color="#1A2BBB">(Record) 17:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, changed the spelling errors. Darthfuzzball 19:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I have a question: How long does the Good article voting last, and if there is a multiple-way tie, what happens? Are they all made into good articles? Darthfuzzball 19:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It always ends on Saturday at 12 (midnight) EST time. And yes, there can be ties. And yes, they can all be made into good articles. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 19:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. I'm knew to this whole good article thing, so I figured I'd ask Darthfuzzball 20:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Nominated: Been working hard on this, and it's longer than my first GA! I think it meets the new requirements. I just noticed about changing the sources, so I've done that. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 17:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Review: (Note I am aware that some of the notes below are not in the rules, but I might as well point them out along with the grammatical/spelling and formatting errors)
 * 2) * I'll mention now, from the start, that you need to stop putting images right in the middle of a sentence or paragraph. It breaks the text and is unorganized, so you need to properly format an image before or after a paragraph (or section header) rather than in it.
 * 3) * The Intro is one huge paragraph. Cut it down into two or three, please. Also in the intro, "Bounty Hunter" is not capitalized. It's not a proper noun/term.
 * 4) * There are no dates in the infobox. On birth/death, you just put the worlds where she was born and died, and no dates. Please give dates. If they are "unknown" (for reasons unknown) then just put "Unknown, Dxun" or whatever.
 * 5) * Under affiliation, please remove the asterisk before the "Mandalorians" since it's all by itself, and therefore the asterisk isn't needed.
 * 6) * From early life: "This angered many people in the clan, yet Twen's husband had been influential enough for her to still have some power among the clan, and she managed to make sure that Sela remained there. Yet still, as Sela's antics continued, the patience of the elders of the tribe began to wear thin. Yet Twen still managed to keep her in the village." There is redundancy in there. You already said that Twen was able to keep Sela in the village, yet you say it again. Merge the whole thing about her influential power and the elders into one sentence to avoid this.
 * 7) * From Disaster and trouble section: Please split it up into paragraphs rather than one huge one. Also: "brother in law" should be "brother-in-law". "Uncle in law" should be "uncle-in-law", etc. No need to emphasize words in the article, so please remove the italics from "Sela really would try".
 * 8) * Later: "She scarred him horrifically down one cheek" Remove horrifically; that has point of view, and articles must have neutral/no point of view. Later: " Sela had no choice to agree" Makes no sense, but I think you're trying to say "Sela had no choice but to agree". Right after the latter: " and the young ten year old set out into the dangerous Dxun jungle. " Remove dangerous, as that is also point of view. Later: "such as Boma's" Bomas, without the apostrophe. Later: "The lake was beautifully clear," Remove beautifully. Point of view. Rewrite the following sentence to be worded better, although I know what you're trying to say: "She had found herself, except for the predators, a paradise."
 * 9) * Skipping down: In the behind the scenes section, your link to Bible is incorrect, spelled Bilbe. Also though, you don't need to link to the Bible, we all know what it is. Instead you could specify what story it came from and link to that if possible. If not, then just take out the fact entirely, since there are tons of Bible stories.
 * 10) * I'll read more later. For now, there you have it. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 18:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) **Oh dang. It would seem, as Jesus would have said, I have been picking the speck out of my brother's eye when there is a plank in my own. I'll a have to go back and change those. Thanks Vic. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 18:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) *Problems sorted. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 19:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) **I'll review more later. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 19:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) Review, again:
 * 15) *In relationships: "Originally, the relationship between Keshu Trom and Sela was purely one of a doctor and a patient, and then a carer, after Trom's physical and mental injuries after the brutal treatment of his mother." That sentence needs to be worded better. I know what you're trying to say, but it's badly worded, plus "career" is spelt incorrectly.
 * 16) *In Talents and abilities: "Skilful" is spelt wrong. Double "L" is needed.
 * 17) *Under legacy: "Mother I lived with you so little, The sadness in my stomach just will not settle, I loved you much but I know I must, keep away from revenge and lust." The first part of the sentence is italicized, and the rest isn't. Why is that? Instead, just put it in a quote, and write about it differently in the section, because it looks messy otherwise, especially when only half of it is italicized.
 * 18) *Under the "family" section, the quote is incorrectly used. There is no quotation mark after the first phrase and no quotation mark before the second phrase. Either use Dialogue or learn how to properly format two-line quotes.
 * 19) *Also in that section, you put "Jedi-Enclave". There is no dash between those two words, they're two separate words. Also, you last sentence of the second paragraph is badly worded. "Reminded of the Keshu Trom who once loved her, she agreed to take him in, and her son and Danreb, the Rodian, were inseparable for their childhoods." You need to word it better so it is clear that you are talking about something else towards the end. Also, "childhoods" isn't a word. Instead put something like "her son and Danreb were inseparable during their childhood". The rest, just word it better or split it.
 * 20) *I'll review more later, but I will say you have way to many enormous paragraphs. You need to split some of these into two, three or even four paragraphs, because right now a lot of them are very, excessively large. It's annoying and everything merges together when you do that, making the article harder to read. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 23:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:EsCape.jpg is not properly sourced, thereby failing Requirement #6. You must state the exact source of the image, not the website you found it on. - <font color="#1A2BBB">President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(Pressroom) <font color="#1A2BBB">(Record) 00:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Per above. Also, I think you're forgetting the main introductory quote.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|45px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *Not necessary, however. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 02:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral/comments
While it's not a rule, you shouldn't repeat images. - <font color="#1A2BBB">President Brandon Rhea  <font color="#1A2BBB">(Pressroom) <font color="#1A2BBB">(Record) 20:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Why does the same image appear twice in the article--both in the infobox and in the actual article? I'm not really sure if that's ok... Darthfuzzball 19:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with it. One is her profile picture, to show the main image of her, the second time it appears is to show the difference between her previous appearance. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 20:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Shall I remove the second image? [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 20:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Definitely. --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 20:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, done. What's Fuzzball going on about winning and stuff? Is it only the article with the most aprrovals that becomes a GA or something? [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] My page iChat What I've done 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 08:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 21:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know for sure. Maybe, but they might take ones that have a lot even if they don't have the most. Like i said, I'm knew to this whole Good Article thing. Darthfuzzball 02:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Meets standards. - <font color="#1A2BBB">President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(Pressroom) <font color="#1A2BBB">(Record) 21:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Brandon. I already reviewed this last night. [[Image:Grin.gif]] --<font color="#9F0500">Victor Dorantes <font color="#0C003F">(discussion) <font color="#0C003F">(contributions) 22:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) No objections. -MPK 01:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Been eying this for a while. Personally enjoyed it, very good.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|45px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)