Star Wars Fanon:Requests for adminship

This page is used to elect sysops, people who can correct pages, delete, block harmful users, and so on.

Since there are no sysops except neomessiah, we need someone else. The community is small, so 9 or 10 admins are enough for now. Who wants to be an admin?

Please post your comments on the talk page.

Candidates

 * Aiddat
 * Ewoksfist
 * Di'e Go Am'er'ez
 * Pinata
 * Wikimaniac
 * MaulYoda
 * Gnosis is knowledge

Option 1
There are three subsections, support (s), oppose (o), neutral (n). If (s + o + n) > X, then the user gets sysop rights. s = +1, o = -1, n = 0.

Option 2
There are three subsections, support (s), oppose (o), neutral (n). The candidate is elected only if the percentage of supporters is greater than X%. The "oppose" and "neutral" sections are mostly used to comment why one feels that the candidate shouldn't be elected.

Option 3
If after at least a week, one user has more votes than every other user with no oppositions, that user becomes a sysop. The second place user also becomes a sysop. If there is a tie, both users become sysops.

How To Nominate

 * Find the name of the user you want to nominate
 * Place your username under support, objection, or neutral. You can also add a comment after your username. Please add the * (star) symbol before your vote so we can order the list in a proper way.
 * You are allowed to vote for yourself, if you wish.
 * You are allowed to nominate more than one person but you can only nominate each person once.

Current Standings
These standings are determined by who has the most votes. This may, however, not be the way the winner is determined. Also, oppositions will lower the amount of votes you have.


 * 1) MaulYoda (10)
 * 2) Gnosis is knowledge (6)
 * 3) Wikimaniac, Aiddat (4)
 * 4) Ewoksfist, (3)
 * 5) Di'e Go Am'er'ez, Pinata, (2)


 * vote candidates here

MaulYoda
Support
 * 1. I learned from looking threw the history that MaulYoda helped improve the main page and this page. If he can do that, imagine what else he could do as an administrator . Nihilusdude
 * You share an IP with MaulYoda. Are you voting twice? Angela (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm his neighbo. We have the same IP. Nihilusdude 15:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. Hey, you improved the main page! If you are given admin powers you will do fine TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * TempMan shares an IP with Johnny the Vandal and other vandals. Angela (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * 3. MaulYoda 19:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You can't vote for yourself. Angela (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, unless you're officially changing the nomination process, I don't know how to do fancy quotes but: "You are allowed to vote for yourself, if you wish." (Check the How to Nominate section.) --Pinata 16:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * 4. He's already helped out quite a bit, I think he's proved his devotion to our cause.--Pinata 21:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5. MaulYoda is a very dedicated member of the community. I think I speak for everyone (besides the vandals) when I say: We will all feel a little safer with MaulYoda as an admin.Ewoksfist 03:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 6. My vote is on you (thanks for correcting the vandalism)-Darth Fury
 * You share an IP with Ewoksfist. Are you voting twice? Angela (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 7 I've been here for a while and i haven't heard/read one bad thing about him. He also reversed damage that the vandals did David lill 09:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 8. MaulYoda is possibly the best wikipedian on this wiki (no offense, everybody else).  He would help us out a lot. -Di'e
 * 9. MaulYoda is a great user, definately one of the best 3 on here, and would be a great help to swfanon. Gnosis is knowledge 19:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 10. I don't think anymore needs be said. Vote this user for administrator. Someone needs to stop these vandals now! NKSCF 4:09 p.m., 2 June, 2006

Neutral

Wikimaniac
Support
 * 1. He fails at grammar, but he is unlikely to abuse admin powers TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. I will get block and ban any evil vandal. - Wikimaniac
 * 3. He's improved his grammar quite a bit since I got here, and he seems to truly want to help. Besides, he voted for me. --Pinata 15:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4 David lill 09:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral
 * 1. While I do not oppose Wikimaniac being an admin, I am unsure whether he would be effective enough in removing vandals. Ewoksfist 23:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I to, am quite unsure of how effective Wikimaniac would be. Gnosis is knowledge 23:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Ewoksfist
Support
 * 1. My vote for you TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. If I am elected I will have no tolerance for vandalism. I will crack down on vandals VERY hard. Ewoksfist 03:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3. I think if Ewoksfist can spend a lot of time at home, he would be a valuable asset to this community as an administrator. MaulYoda 01:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Pinata
Support Oppose
 * 1. New, but unlikely to abuse power TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. He is the type that is a great page corrector and is most likely defeat evil vandals. - Wikimaniac
 * 3. Pinata would be a good admin. He wouldn't do anything wrong. Gnosis is knowledge 14:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Di'e Go Am'er'ez
Support
 * 1. Unlikely to abuse power, and he has been here for a while TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * 2. I think Di'e Go Am'er'ez would make a good admin. Ewoksfist 23:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Aiddat
Support
 * 1. Unlikely to abuse power TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * 2. My vote is for Aiddat. I believe he would greatly improve SW Fanon. Ewoksfist 23:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * 3. Aiddat is a great user. As long as he can be on most of the time he'd be great. Gnosis is knowledge 00:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 4. Thanks for nominating me. I think I can specialize in both anti-vandal stuff and peaceful community stuff. I'm not usually on 7 hours straight, like today. But I'll have my short days and long days. -Aiddat 21:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1. While I would not oppose Aiddat, he hasn't been on in a long time.  I therefore recind (recall(take back)) my vote for Aiddat. -Di'e Go Am'er'ez

Questions
 * If you were an admin, would you respect Wikia's protection policy? Or would you want to lock the pages you'd been working on? Angela (talk) 04:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Gnosis is knowledge
Support Oppose
 * 1. I think Gnosis is knowledge is the kind of admin we need, one whose ready to stare vandals right in the eye and say "You're going down!" MaulYoda 02:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. He's been a huge help categorizing pages, too. He's definitely admin material... one of the best people we have, in fact.--Pinata 14:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3. I find that I would make a great admin, most specifically in blocking and deleting.Gnosis is knowledge 17:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4. Gnosis has helped me many a time in getting used to this particular wiki and has helped edit some of my mistakes on posted articles. NKSCF 4:12 p.m., 2 June, 2006
 * 5. May other nominees also vote for other admins? I honorably accept my nomination, and support Gnosis. My opinion is summed up by what MaulYoda said. -Aiddat 23:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6. Gnosis is knowledge will be a great asset in blocking vandals. Ewoksfist 05:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral