Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best the Star Wars Fanon Wiki has to offer.

What makes a featured article or what article should you nominate to feature? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...


 * 1) ...be well written and detailed
 * 2) ...be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) ...have a sufficient proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
 * 9) ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 2 or more supports than any other article and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!!

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Current Standings
These standings are determined by who has the most votes. This may, however, not be the way the winner is determined. Also, oppositions will lower the amount of votes you have, as long as they're for a good reason. Neutral does nothing.


 * 1) Reven (4)
 * 2) Ussej Padric Bac III (2)
 * 3) Mission to Bastion, Tosh Zath (1)
 * 4) 0R-C0, Xethyr (0)
 * 5) Lah D'ar, Mercke Lutso (-1)
 * 6) Troyb (-5)

=Nominations=

Support

 * 1) A very good articles. Very long. Very well writen. The character is canon, but I don't think that matters because the information is fanon.
 * 2) Sure. I was amazed that this wasn't featured before (p.s, Reven (the article here) is not canon).
 * 3) Ditto, Gnosis. What happened to us?
 * 4) Why not. - Brandon Rhea 02:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 08:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) It spelled the name wrong. That is my only quarrel. Karohalva 03:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Is that really a necessary reason to oppose the article? Plus, it isn't meant to be Darth Revan (the Dark Lord), if you read the article. Its someone who had a similar name and was inspired by him. -- [[Image:JM76Sig.gif]] Talk to an Admin Mind Trick Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg]]

Comment

 * 1) Somebody else nominated my article!! OMG :P -- [[Image:JM76Sig.gif]] Talk to an Admin Mind Trick Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg]]

Support

 * 1) Not as good as Swerto but still pretty good. It may not be the longest article ever but it is still quality. Swerto 11:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Needs more pictures, the title must be changed, removing the nickname. The infobox image must be resized, the inital mentioning of the article subject must be emboldened, categories must be check. [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 22:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, it was the "'Orco Fett'" part that I objected too. The article should probably be moved too OR-CO. [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 10:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) It is a neat concept, and all, but it still needs some more pictures.

Comments

 * I'd still like to see more pictures before I support this. As it stands, it's not really pleasing to the eye. - Brandon Rhea 19:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * well if someone can get a picture of Jango without the helmet and paint the armor black for me i'll use that... other than that I doubt i'm going to do anything else.Swerto
 * I found an older picture of Orco' in his black composite armor with the bounty hunter armor arm given to me by a friend who is now dead in real life. Completely forgot I uploaded it. Swerto
 * Added another picture, I resized the infobox, I also bolded the top text. Now what do you mean categories must be check? Swerto 02:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I have expanded this article and also added pictures since it was last nominated Pinky 01:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) It still needs some improvements.
 * 2) Per Gnosis, plus, it doesn't feel right for me. [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 10:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Per Aedile. - Brandon Rhea 10:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well can you tell me what needs to be improved? Pinky 22:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It needs more pictures, the pictures that are there are pretty bad and the writing could be improved. - Brandon Rhea 18:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I figured out how to draw better lightsabers so the pictures are better. tell me how you like them now. 22:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * [[image:elecjudg.jpg|thumb|100px]]

I also added a picture of him using electric judgement. it's the same as the pic in the userbox but the hands are moved and theres electric judgement coming out of his hands. tell me if you like it 16:19, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I've worked on it a lot since it was last nominated.--DeadGuy 19:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Dead end article, main pic needs resizing. Pictures could be placed in better locations, more. [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 22:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * I agree with Abeonis. - Brandon Rhea 19:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I plan on making the base bio longer once I have some time. what do you guys think? (and did I nominate correctly...? Or did I screw it up?)

Oppose

 * 1) If you plan on having a major edit and you believe there should be an edit, as you have said, then this should not be nominated now. Fix it up first, then I will consider voting for it. - Brandon Rhea 21:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This article needs a lot of fixing up.

Point taken, guys. I should nominate it later, after I finish it more completely.

Do you have any specific suggestions?

Support

 * 1) This is an awesome article. --Darth Tyler(talk) 20:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) No way. There are far too many things about this article that are bad.
 * 2) Way too many formatting errors, the first section is one long paragraph and there are no pictures. This needs A LOT of work. - Brandon Rhea 20:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree with the opposition.
 * 4) As do I. Sorry. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Um...I don't think so. -Fedora
 * 6) [[Image:DarthAb.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 11:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Well, I nominated her. I think she's up to par. ( Talon Three )

Support

 * 1) I've worked long and hard on this article to make it the very best it could be and I would be greatly honored if you would consider it for FA status. This article means quite a lot to me, as it is the culmination of almost a year and a half of Role-Playing so I thank you in advance. - Brandon Rhea 03:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Very good article. Also nice and long with a good variety and use of pictures. I also appreciate Role-playing for I know how difficult it is to keep up with role playing. Good article.

Support

 * 1) I think this is a really good article. I worked very hard on it. User:Darth Matas
 * 2) I believe that the issues Brandon has pointed - at least most of them - have been fixed. Diego, I like the article alot and give it my full support. Kessam Prun 16:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) yeah there shouldnt be red links in a featured article 16:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * A few issues. First, there are too many important redlinks. For example, what is the "mission to Borosk"? It's what starts off the main part of the article, yet we have no idea what it is. Second, the "Declaration" section should either be more detailed or placed into another part of the article, possibly whichever section the character would have said it in. Lastly, the intro needs to be MUCH longer and MUCH more detailed. One of the first things this page says is that an article must "have a sufficient proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box". As it stands, you only have one sentence and that certainly is not enough. If you correct these things, I will support this article. - Brandon Rhea 03:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The lead is a bit better, and in my mind it is suffecient, but I would still like to see the Mission to Borosk page you have created have some info on it and I would also reccomend doing something with the "Declaration" section. I would suggest just adding it in somewhere else in the article, because simply saying "This is the speech made by Darth Tarna to the galaxy" and then posting the small speech really doesn't warrant a section in my opinion. I would also like to see the other redlinks taken care of. - Brandon Rhea 16:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I had a FA that had lots of red links in it. Besides, there are only about five or six red links. I believe this should be a featured article after the improvement of the said Decleration section. I am still keeping my vote to support, however. Kessam Prun 00:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)