Thread:Brandon Rhea/@comment-25898954-20150131111950/@comment-25898954-20150215112036

Perhaps I gave the wrong impression. I completely agree that creativity and story are the key deciding factors in selecting a good Featured Fanon article. I was simply suggesting creating a separate category of users (or perhaps extending the responsibilities of Archivists) who would edit and polish nominated articles prior to community voting to ensure they meet the basic standards of the Article Guidelines. This would eliminate the need for a GA/FA-style review board, which would be replaced by a consensus track for users to vote on the content of the piece, the important part. My point is that if these articles are to be showcased as the "best" and "most creative" works on this wiki, there should be at least some degree of uniformity in grammar and syntax.

These are just my thoughts. Whenever you wish to undertake this project, I would be happy to assist in any way.