Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Nominations

 This is the voting and review page for featured article nominations. Featured articles are articles on the Star Wars Fanon Wiki that represent the best that the wiki has to offer in the way of quality above that of general standards. Out of on this wiki, less than eighty (80) are currently of featured status. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can and will be proposed for improvement or removal by the Council of Seers, the eight (8) member featured article and good article review board.

In order for an article to become featured, it must meet a set of requirements including, but not limited to, being of substantial length and detail while covering all possible encyclopedic angles. After it is nominated on this page, members of the Council of Seers and users will then review and vote on it to determine whether it is of featured article quality.

Do you need help writing a featured article? Feel free to read over our featured article tutorial to learn more. You can also visit the Writing Center's FA projects forum for interactive community help!

How to nominate:

In order to be considered for featured article status, an article must meet the featured article requirements written and determined by the community of the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. If an author then nominates their article for featured status, the Nominated template will be placed at the top of the nomination. Please nominate articles using the following format:


 * === Article name ===
 * Objections and discussion – (0 Council of Seers/0 users/0 total)

Using this format, only votes of approval will be placed on the featured article nominations page. All objections and comments will be placed onto the Council of Seers namespace page. If you are unsure as to how to set up the nomination's accompanying "CS" review page, feel free to check out the example review page we have provided for you.

How to vote:

Both the Council of Seers and general users may vote on featured article nominations. In order to vote, however, they must have the one hundred (100) mainspace/article edits required by the voting policy. Both Seers and voting users may review by adding comments, critique and feedback on the article, and they will then vote on whether or not the article is of featured article quality. Once at least four (4) members of the Council of Seers and at least five (5) other users, Seer other otherwise, have voted, an article will become featured. This means that an article needs at least nine (9) votes to pass. Seer votes are marked with the template.

If an article is nominated that is clearly not of featured article quality, the Council of Seers may reject its nomination. If an article is rejected, it will be added to the list of rejected nominations, and it may not again be nominated until one week later, giving it ample time to fix a rejected article. However, other Seers or community members hold the right to object to a rejected nominee, although only a consensus or vote may overturn the decision of the rejection.

Alternatively, the Seers may change a featured article nominee into a good article nominee instead, or vice-a-versa. However, if an author prefers to instead keep his/her article a good or featured nominee, he/she may do so and reject the change. This may not occur, though, if the article is being rejected without objections.

Please note that no article may become a featured article if there are still active legitimate objections on its review page. If a majority of Seers deem any objections to be nonsensical and/or of personal preference, and these objections are holding up the passing of a nomination, the objections will be struck out. This will only be done if the nonsensical and/or personal preference objections are holding up the nomination. Because of this, it is required that all users strike out their objections using once the nominator has sufficiently corrected them.

Approved articles:

If an article is voted as a featured article by the community and the Council of Seers, it will be added to the list of featured articles, the upcoming article queue, and to the history of featured articles. The Council of Seers namespace review page will be archived on the main Council of Seers page as well, and a star indicating that the article is featured will be placed in the era icons field on the new featured article.

If an article that is both a former good article and a former featured article upon its nomination on this page, it will be granted both good and featured article status if the nomination is successful.

Jedi Temple (ESW)
Objections and discussion – (3 Council of Seers/5 users/8 total)
 * 1) Just a few  s. Which I  ed. ^-^ Oh, and FIRST VOTE! BOOYAH! - Solus  (Bird of Prey)  14:56, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Good job. --Wylindsig.png  (Conference Room)  21:39, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) ---Ping(JediCommando) 00:28, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) -- Josh Bender Talk 07:18, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Droid IRC [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|16px]] 20:32, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) --Bluethunder Talk 01:20, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Thenorthernman (Talk) 12:07, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Jedi Order (ESW)
Objections and discussion – (1 Council of Seers/2 users/3 total)
 * 1) ---Ping(JediCommando) 02:29, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Finally had some time to read it, good job.- Bluethunder Contact 23:16, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Finally had some time to read it, good job.- Bluethunder Contact 23:16, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Aron Kel
Objections and discussion - (1 Seers/0 users/1 total)


 * 1) ---Ping(JediCommando) 23:01, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) No objections here. - Bluethunder Contact 23:39, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Conqueror I-class Star Destroyer
Objections and discussion – (0 Council of Seers/1 users/1 total)
 * 1) Good article.- Bluethunder Contact 22:09, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Bombing of the Jedi Enclave
Objections and discussion – (0 Council of Seers/1 users/1 total)
 * 1) No objections here. - Bluethunder Contact 22:51, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Meeting on Ord Mirit
Objections and discussion – (1 Council of Seers/2 users/3 total)


 * 1) Not bad, not bad. --Wylindsig.png  (Conference Room)  22:21, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I was going to vote for this yesterday, totally forgot. - Bluethunder Contact 02:23, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Ditto.- Chosen One So the Prophecy says... 02:26, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Tragedy
Objections and discussion – (1 Council of Seers/3 users/4 total)
 * 1) Nothing to complain about and I had a massive contribution to make this historic moment possible.- Chosen One So the Prophecy says... 05:05, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I have no objections. --Wylindsig.png  (Conference Room)  22:14, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) No complaints here.- Bluethunder Contact 22:16, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Paving the way for articles once again. Watch, he'll somehow bend the rules to make his author article into a FA as well. -- Josh Bender Talk 23:37, March 24, 2010 (UTC)