Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 7) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page showcase box.
 * 8) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled, even if they are stubs.
 * 9) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 10) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Characteristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) If there are already five nominees on the page, you may not nominate anymore. If more than five nominees are posted, anything after the fifth nominee will be removed.
 * 5) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Veneradi (5)
 * 2) Jonathan Bac (4)

Support

 * 1) Per the other day. - Brandon Rhea 16:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per last day, subject to change. Dexington 17:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Dex. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per the above. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 19:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Neutral/Comments

 * I can honestly say, though this article is good, I don't consider it a good article (same goes for Xendor Taral) anymore because since the intro is so long, it could just be broken into sections (or else, it's just a big introduction, which is failure of the requirements in my opinion) and expanded. Basically, I just want to see more expansion on articles like this before voting on them anymore. -- Victor  ( talk ) 23:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to argue here, but if this is the case then Androc Montra is also a failure of the requirements as they ask for a complete history. - Brandon Rhea 01:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well if you wanted to revert the GA status of articles that failed the requirements, that'd be fine by me, as long as all of those types of articles would be revoked. Such as Androc Montra and Xendor Taral; and, make all those without the requirements ineligible for nominations. This is another reason why I believe that either HP be given the same powers as DLs have with FAs but with the GAs, or that the HPs be abolished and DLs also have say over the GAs. If the HPs are to remain, they should at least have the power to say that even if an article wins by voting, it cannot win if it lacks requirements. Or we could amend the GA requirements as we did with the FAs. Anything to make these stabilize, fair and work properly. -- Victor  ( talk ) 01:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That's a discussion for another place (we could write some proposals for consensus). Regardless, I have written an introduction, broken the history into smaller sections and added two pictures. - Brandon Rhea 01:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed. -- Victor  ( talk ) 01:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I think that the article is pretty good, though there are some areas that could use touch up. Things like grammatical and spelling corrections, small things that could easily be overlooked. I'm not going to give my vote, just yet, until those are fixed. It was mainly in the History, during the Military Career and The Brotherhood. There were a couple words that were repeated often. --  Tesh  162  17:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I think it has everything it needs for GA/FA standards. Been working on this since last week and I just finished it today. -- Victor  ( talk ) 23:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) There are a few one-liners in there that could be combined into other paragraphs or expanded into their own, but this is very good nonetheless. - Brandon Rhea 01:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *If you don't mind, could you please tell me where specifically I can expand/combine? -- Victor  ( talk ) 02:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) **"For over 2,000 years, the Locadi did not resurface with a full scale war. Instead, they remained hidden, only attacking when necessary and in the shadows." and "Lord Tarkumtl Qotzl met the Shadow Master Frey Dorr of the Skadukliek while pursuing the Locadi, and the two fought the war, side by side.". - Brandon Rhea 02:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Thanks. -- Victor  ( talk ) 03:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ****Those two one liners have been expanded upon, Brandon. -- Don Victor, Sr.  [[Image:Coat of arms of Mexico.png|27px]] ( Commission Room ) 05:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Yup. Very neat article.&mdash; Darthtyler Talk 02:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Other than the Halo inspiration, it is good. Dexington 00:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) *You don't like Halo?  -- Don Victor, Sr.  [[Image:Coat of arms of Mexico.png|27px]] ( Commission Room ) 00:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Per Dex. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  01:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Neutral/Comments

 * Originally, the "external" links to other wikis were looking like normal links. For example " Halopedia would look like a normal internal link, and that was for all wikia wikis (like Wookieepedia, Wikipedia, etc). But now, for some reason, it looks stupid again (with the little arrow at the right) and so I apologize for that, hopefully it goes back to the way it was before (it looks nice that way). -- Victor  ( talk ) 00:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)