Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Per the majority opinion of the High Priests, due to the High Priests not being as overwhelmed with nominations as they were in the past, we will now be accepting TEN nominations per round but no more than ten. This is subject to change in the coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 7) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page showcase box.
 * 8) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled, even if they are stubs.
 * 9) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 10) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Characteristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) If there are already five nominees on the page, you may not nominate anymore. If more than five nominees are posted, anything after the fifth nominee will be removed.
 * 5) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Jarik Pellaeon (3)
 * 2) Jar'Kata (3)

=Nominations=

Support

 * 1) Wrote this article today and it is my first one. Xwing327 04:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I think the parts mentioned below are just fine for a GA, but they must be expanded for this to become an FA. Great article. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 17:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Those guys are used to doing the FA stuff, but for GA I think it is fine the way it is. His early life could be expanded some more, some gramatical areas and the stuff they listed below could all be fixed up, but its good right now. If you want it to be FA, much more expansion is needed. Dexington 23:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) The expansions have made this GA, in my opinion. However, as Dex said, more expansion will be needed for FA. - Brandon Rhea 01:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) A good article, but it's too short in my opinion. There aren't enough links in the main body, that should change when you begin writing more articles. And expand the lst sections ("Legacy" down). Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 17:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Expand Legacy, Personality and Traits and Talents. More links are optional, as you only need one for GA status. When this is nominated for FA, however, this article will need a lot more expansion. So, for now, just fix those few things and then this will be worthy of GA status. Good work so far, though! - Brandon Rhea 17:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
Thanks guys for telling me what needs to be fixed. I expanded the Legacy section and added a whole new section to the existing history. I will expand talents and the personality section right now. I am also going to be uploading more pictures for the article. Xwing327 00:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I expanded talents and personality. As I write more articles, I'll add links. Xwing327 00:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) For a lightsaber form article, I think it has enough to be a GA. I did a check and it is longer (and IMO, more detailed) than Jasca's FA for Atra-Manua. Dexington 20:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice. Xwing327 02:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Per the Voting policy. - Brandon Rhea 11:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) Very nice. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 19:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)