Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written with enough detail to tell the entire story accurately and appropriately, though it does not have to be anywhere near the size that FAs should be as the Good Article main page states that some “cannot reach FA status as of yet due to its limited content”.
 * 2) &hellip;have at least five links to articles on Star Wars Fanon (if applicable).
 * 3) &hellip;be unbiased, neutral point of view.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances.
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;have all proper era icons.
 * 7) &hellip;not be tagged with any form of improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 8) &hellip;have a 150 word introduction that can be used in the Good Article History.
 * 9) &hellip;have absolutely no red links.
 * 10) &hellip;have a well detailed History section, and one that is complete if the character’s story is not continuing in novels/comics/etc., and a Post mortem section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 11) &hellip;have a Personality and traits section for a character and Characteristics section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle, etc.
 * 12) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article. Please nominate in this format:
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.
 * 1) Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 2) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 3) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.
 * 1) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Aurelius Tempest, Cilwelli (5)
 * 2) Merkory Chal'wala (3)

Support

 * 1) Absolutely, however some of the paragraphs should be combined since they are actually one sentence. Not enough to make this a non-support vote though. Dexington 23:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Dex. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) "Impressive".
 * 4) Very good, just combine some of the few sentence lines to make them actual paragraphs, or expand the shorter ones. That way, we'll know how long it actually is. Considering the content of this article, though, it's not enough to actually oppose this nomination. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]]  (Pressroom)  (Accomplishments)  18:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Nice. Very creative and original.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 21:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Nice. Very creative and original.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 21:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Re-nominated. I ran it up on spell and grammar check, and sorted out the falty areas. Darth tom  Chit 'n' Chat 20:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Very good article. Dexington 19:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) This will need work in order to reach FA status, which I will elaborate upon if and when this is placed on the FA nominations page, but for now I believe this is of good article quality. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]]  (Pressroom)  (Accomplishments)  05:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) It's decent, but you might want to look at what his "date of death" is.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 21:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Neutral/comments
I haven't properly read through it to see if there are any more errors or anything like that, but the images are not properly placed. Images should be placed in a left, right, left, right, left, etc. order. Because that's not against GA standards, it's not enough for me to oppose it. However, I'm not ready to support it yet either. - President Brandon Rhea   (Pressroom)   (Accomplishments)  22:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Per ^. Dexington 23:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, I sorted out the images, and they are now going from right to left. Darth tom Chit 'n' Chat 17:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Giving my article a second chance here. --  Riffsyphon  1024 06:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, a good article. --Squishy Vic discussion archives 06:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Agreed, good job. Dexington 01:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Yesh. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  01:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I'd be lying to you if I said I was a fan of the images, but the article itself is of Good Article quality so it has my vote. - President Brandon Rhea  [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]]  (Pressroom)  (Accomplishments)  05:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Per above. The images aren't the best around, but your article qualifies nonetheless. Good work!--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 21:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)