Forum:Introductions vote

This isn't something I care about too much, but as a Seer, it's quite annoying reading long introductions; introductions are supposed to leave out the details and give us a broad view on an article's content, specifically because we need to, for example, on a character, cover said character's entire life within an introduction. Giving into details sometimes becomes too much. However, with Roviik Antrell, I felt forced to give into spewing out detail after detail, due to the number of words required for a featured article, and, with shorter good article-nominees, the same thing.

I'm not complaining too badly - it can be done, sure - but I just want to lessen the requirement, while at the same time limiting the amount of words one can mash into an introduction. And for those wondering, no, this was not because of Obi-Wan Kenobi, a recently reviewed article; that simply reminded me of it, from other long introductions we used to have that were just annoying, and some that we still have. Yes, I myself have had long, ugly, introductions. I probably still do in some articles - but again, some are because I had to do it, to meet requirements. Anyway, the process is explained below.

There is no "oppose"; it's either you support the following proposals or you don't, which you can state in the discussion or in the "Keep as is" section. You can add in your own proposal(s) as long as you follow my nice, neat, obsessive formatting. voting policy applies as usual, and I would recommend all those who care about, write, and vote on good or featured articles participate. Those who don't, I suggest you don't voice an unfair opinion, considering you aren't even an active GAN/FAN-man. Just a couple of suggestions. ;) Please vote for one in each category (GA and FA) only. Thank you! --Victortalk 04:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Good articles
The following proposals are in the following format: "Reduced number of words required for introduction / limit of words in introduction".

100 / 200

 * 1) --Victortalk 04:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Featured articles
The following proposals are in the following format: "Reduced number of words required for introduction / limit of words in introduction".

200 / 300

 * 1) --Victortalk 04:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
Please keep the formatting nice and neat and remain civil. --Victortalk 04:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)