User:VDO

Greetings, I'm Victor Dorantes. Check out that article for more biographical information on me there, instead. Here, I'll keep a bunch of semiorganized junk around that pertains to the wiki.

Wiki links

 * Categories
 * Articles by
 * Images by
 * Templates by
 * Internal links
 * Blog
 * User contributions
 * Editcount
 * eMail
 * Prefixindex
 * User talk
 * See also
 * Darthipedia
 * The Dorantes Family
 * TheForce.Net
 * Hyperspace &mdash; The HoundStar Cantina
 * Wookieepedia

Personal keepsakes

 * Star Wars Episode IV: Lost Hope (AU ANH Era) – Sirhc Legna
 * The Star Wars – Roviik Narod
 * Star Wars: Darkwatch – Vito Roviik Trey / Roviik
 * Star Wars: Jedi Knight: Lords of the Empire – Roviik
 * The Next Jedi Generation: Survival – Roviik
 * The Crusade of the Reborn – Roviik
 * The Clone Wars - Tales from the Jedi Order – Roviik
 * Archangels and Alchemists – Roviik
 * The Will of the Force Chronicles: A Life of Serivce – Draegan "Dray" Antrell
 * DiggerRourke / contributions
 * Clearing and deletion–Category:Images by JawaChief, Category:Images by Jasca Ducato, Category:Images by Nephlyte348, Category:Images by Red Head Rider, Category:Images by TPrice180
 * SUBST'd sig'–WhatLinksHere

Star Wars fanon commandments



 * Trust in these, my son...


 * Believe in Wookieepedia. Wookieepedia is the most reliable and organized wiki of all Wikia, and no doubt it is the best guide for a 'fellow' Star Wars wiki. Of course this doesn't speak for all of Wookieepedia, knowing a lot of articles are still junk; still, they have many good and featured articles that are of great quality and give the best example for anyone willing to create their own up-to-par article; this goes for anything from sourcing to formatting. Plus, a major benefit from Wookieepedia is also that some users are very code-oriented, always giving us great new or updated templates to work with.
 * Never place your articles in a gallery-type article. Since here on Star Wars Fanon, free-edit canon articles (like Jedi Knight) will not become good, featured, or even of a good quality (without major collaborative effort), then articles like that have become galleries (or at least some of them). I originally did list my articles as part of these articles, but have since removed them; why? Because things change, and pages like require lots of searching and manual editing, at most times at least. Therefore, I rather not keep listing my articles knowing things may change over time.
 * Never place your articles, content in a year article. Likewise from above, things change. You may slightly change a date, remove an event entirely, or alter a death year. Things change, hence why I never use years anymore (aside from linking to them for linking purposes alone) due to this inevitable change. But more importantly, most year articles are sloppy, filled with crappy formatting from other, newer users or maybe even a flood of red-links. So, basically, keep away from them.