Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written with enough detail to tell the entire story accurately and appropriately, though it does not have to be anywhere near the size that FAs should be as the Good Article main page states that some “cannot reach FA status as of yet due to its limited content”.
 * 2) &hellip;have at least five links to articles on Star Wars Fanon (if applicable).
 * 3) &hellip;be unbiased, neutral point of view.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances.
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;have all proper era icons.
 * 7) &hellip;not be tagged with any form of improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 8) &hellip;have a 150 word introduction that can be used in the Good Article History.
 * 9) &hellip;have absolutely no red links.
 * 10) &hellip;have a well detailed History section, and one that is complete if the character’s story is not continuing in novels/comics/etc., and a Post mortem section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 11) &hellip;have a Personality and traits section for a character and Characteristics section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle, etc.
 * 12) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * Club StarDust, Kal'Shabbol (6)

Support

 * 1) At the risk of sounding arrogant, I really don't know how anyone can look at this article and say that it's not up to Good Article standards. Solus and I have worked on this, our first collaboration, A LOT for the past week now (and, speaking of only the history and the ideas of what the planet is like, an additional three years for myself overall) and it's definitely GA worthy. It has everything a planet article needs (and then some). I'll also point out that more about the Flora and fauna will continue to be updated, but as it stands there is enough for GA status. - President Brandon Rhea [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom)   (Accomplishments)  07:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah, I looked at this the other day and immediately thought "holy expletive deleted". I also knew it would be here today. Needless to say, this is a GA and probably a first timer FA. Dexington 15:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't think I've ever seen a planet article that detailed before. Great job Rhea and Solus. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 16:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) I hope I don't sound obnoxious, but I like it. :D Thank you. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Good work as always, Brandon/Solus. -MPK 18:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) This totally rocks. -- Squishy Vic HoloNet 209 06:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I've put quite a bit of effort into this article lately. And I think it's about time we had a seventies-themed subject for an article. Unit 8311 08:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I love this article. Dexington 13:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Geeze, it's about time something like this was made. -MPK 13:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Oh yeah. Shake your booties. -- Squishy Vic HoloNet 209 18:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Let's get funky! - President Brandon Rhea [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom)   (Accomplishments)  18:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Unique. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)