User talk:Michaeldsuarez/Archive 3

Welcome to my talk page. If you you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them. Unfortunately, I'm an administrator on four wikis, so I might be busy. Dispite this, I'll try to answer any messages you have for me as soon as possible.

Re:Deletions
Thanks. I've been doing this for about three hours now. The only problem I have with this wiki is there's not enough vandalism to revert... Drewton  ( Drewton's Holocron ) 15:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but I can't delete pages made by them on there, and it's always fun blocking the vandals  Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 15:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Michael, for your support in both this election and lasts. It's meant a lot, and I look forward to working with you. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] (talk) (contributions) 18:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Template
No, I won't. That's not the purpose of the template (for a full explanation, see my response to you on the template's talk page). Read the proposed policy at User:Brandon Rhea/Joke Policy Proposal and you'll see when users will be directed to Darthipedia. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 16:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Nevermind, seems Drewton already did it. However, his way is fine, because he says very clearly that the author should consider taking it to Darthipedia. That's much better than saying they have to go to Darthipedia, considering the proposal is meant to create deletion discussions for the articles. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 16:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Your example of the fanon template did give that impression, even if you didn't mean it to. The fanon template is there to say "this isn't allowed here, take it somewhere else", whereas my joke template is meant to say "this could be something that should be somewhere else". - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 17:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, no, I wasn't trying to imply that you were suggesting users themselves leave here. I was saying that the impression you gave was that the template should be used to say "get your jokes off of here now" rather than the template being an advisory that it could be a joke article. Looks like we're both confusing one another. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) (contribs) 19:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Wanderers
Hey Michael, I'd suggest taking another look at your move from Wanderers to Wanderer. The article is not about a species, but rather an organization and therefore the plural should be acceptable. The Organization infobox is used, as is the "Sith organizations" category. - Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 16:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. I would have done it myself, but I just wanted to make sure that you didn't see something I was missing. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 19:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

User left template
Hey Michael, since you're clearly not leaving, I'm going to have to ask you to remove the User left template from your user page. Administrators shouldn't have that on their user page unless it's true. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 17:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 17:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

BMP?
This is the same question I asked Brandon earlier. I have found a couple of images that I want to upload, but they are bmp files and can not be uploaded on Star Wars Fanon. What should I do? Is there a way I can convert the file into one that can be used on Star Wars Fanon?Mattkenn3 (Talk) 01:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Changing account
I want to change my account to another one. This is what I did to an other wikia and it was not sockpuppet. I guess you are not going to consider it as sockpuppet if I move all my archives(including the talk ones). I now writing to you using my other account, so i cannot leave my sig.

Spartan-53 aka Darth Odysseas

My new account has the name User:Odysseas-spartan-53. I was inactive for a short period of time. Is there any roleplay to participate? I am bored this weekend and I want to pass my time there.

Spartan-53 aka Darth Odysseas

No, I mean if there is a roleplay there, on SWfanon.Odysseas-spartan-53 17:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

So, there is not an RP or a group of users that working on a story...or something like that? I was on an other fan-fic wikia that there are mostly making articles based on roleplays. What about trying something like that? In that wikia, it seemed impossible to make a roleplay but they made to have a great one, so I thought that if they made it, we can make one ten times better! Why only using this wikia as a database?Odysseas-spartan-53 17:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
I saw you knew of Spartan-53, and his 'new account', Odysseas-spartan-53; you may want to be aware that, per our sockpuppet policy, you still have to ban his 'new account' for three days, as it is a sockpuppet, bots being the only exception to this rule. -- <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 18:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Darth rayze changed his name to Anti-Formal and was still banned for three days, by Squishy Vic, for sockpuppeting. This is exactly the same. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 19:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And so I did. And I'm choosing to take the policy exactly how it's written, and it says bots are the only exception to that. And so I banned him again. Please stop unblocking him, as I've taken the policy as it says, in the completely orthodox way. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 20:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * If you wish to create a forum, there's no need for it to be specifically about the user in question. If I were you, I'd suggest making a Forum in which the Sockpuppet policy is reviewed. As the policy stands, he does need to be banned, as he is not a bot. If you have a problem with this, take it up with the sockpuppet policy itself, and propose a new one. I'm on the IRC if you want to discuss this further. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 20:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * You forgot to say when the proposal ends. I'd recommend it being open to voting for at least a week, so as to allow everyone to vote. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 20:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Bye. If the date's the same as when I last saw it (September 30th) then I'm fine with it. Thanks anyway, though. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 20:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Confusion over my user page
Sorry I am duplicating this material if you have my talk page already watched... but my account seems to have two user pages.

There seems to be two listings for material connected to my account... this one which is not my user page that I set up originally http://www.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tbonepickensetc and this one http://technocracy.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tbonepickensetc which is the user page and talk page I want.

Not really sure why that is so, but could an admin fix that please? This is the account I set up originally and would like as my user page http://technocracy.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tbonepickensetc with my user page information. Could the information here be transferred there? This is getting confusing as it looks like I have two accounts? So... could this talk page be brought there and this blank user page with this talk page be gotten rid of? Also... according to Michailsuarez... I can resume editing... but I am still being blocked when I try to on the Technocracy movement wiki... so not sure now what is going on with me being blocked or unblocked

I was going to add this template to the http://technocracy.wikia.com/wiki/Technocracy_movement article .. but can not.

Here is another link that goes to my original user page I set up http://technocracy.wikia.com/wiki/User:Tbonepickensetc Tbonepickensetc (Talk) 19:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page
Well, the whole point of me trying to get rid of it is because of that last person, since they have me confused for someone else and REFUSE to leave me be, whether it's on this site, or elsewhere... Thaxos (Talk) 02:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, Michael have been busy on Mircosoftword writing my JSWS. Would you like to join?

Also I have a question what is a bot; I think there sockpuppter, sockputtett, sockpuppet users. Jonn1234 (Talk) 02:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I am still blocked
I have not heard a word from Isenhand (Andrew Wallace). I noticed that he blocked another person also from editing that I am not associated with. I do believe he will continue his present conduct... unless or until he is relieved of his administrating that wiki... as no cooperation is shown ... and no answer given to questions raised. If he repeats editing patterns from elsewhere... this means he is trying to create a walled garden of articles ... all leading to his website...and the group he is the Director of.. NET. It may seem like jumping to a conclusion... but this is a pattern. I was going to add another current red link article to this wiki this morning as I thought my block would have been gone by now... but saw the block log Tbonepickensetc (Talk) 18:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Leaving this message here also for reference ...


 * I am not able to edit... I just tried again and got this message http://technocracy.wikia.com/index.php?title=Tech_inc&action=edit


 * It appears he blocked my i.p. ... and unblocked my user name? It is not allowing me to edit. This is what the page says when I try...The reason given is this: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Tbonepickensetc". Tbonepickensetc (Talk) 19:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Permission to unblock
You don't need my permission to do it. If the community has reached a consensus, then you go with whatever that consensus is. Just be sure to archive that part of the vote on the talk page and convert that entire consensus page into a proposal for a new sockpuppet policy. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 15:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Unbocked
After being unblocked, I want to tell you some things:

1)First of all I am sorry because I got everyone in trouble with the name change. I will 'NEVER' change my name again, whatever it happens. I am really sorry again.

2)I was watching this forum topic every day. Thanks for supporting me:)

3)Ok, tomorrow, I will start filling R3-L6 with ideas I have, expanding its story. If you want to give me an idea or advise, do it on its talk page(do not add the idea template). Do you have any tips to make nice articles? I want to make good-detailed articles but I find it very difficult.

Sorry for the trouble I made. I wait for your response,

Odysseas-spartan-53 17:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Is there any project to participate? You told me that there are no roleplays but prejects are quite different aren't they? I know abou the Crentus, is there any other, unfinished project? Do you ave started any?Odysseas-spartan-53 12:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

What about starting a proect together? I don't have A LOT of free time but I will be online for three(at least) hrs a day.Odysseas-spartan-53 13:42, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok. When you don't have anyhting important to do, message me.Odysseas-spartan-53 16:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:IRC matters
Thanks! -- Kathkira talk  01:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Technocracy wikia
One user is pretty much in control of the Technocracy wikia site now. That person is Isenhand or Andrew Wallace.... director of NET who originated the first of the articles. That person is now spamming his self penned and vanity press published book. In other words through mismanagement here at wikia... a user has either page protected or blocked other users from editing and is controlling with a brand of P.O.V. edits information that is leading eventually to his self published book... and its biased and non notable information.

Andrew Wallace or Isenhand is not a notable person in regard to his claim of being the leader of a social movement. He has tied his notability on trying to connect himself to the actual notable movement Technocracy Incorporated... which he disparages through out his wikia writings... and especially has promoted false and misleading information in regard to Howard Scott... the original groups founder and leader.

I suggest that if control of the information can not be disconnected from this one biased editor who has either blocked or page protected himself from others... that the entire set of information in the wiki be removed, and this site of articles be taken down. As long as Isenhand or Dr. Andrew Wallace is going to use wikia for a spam promotion site.... he, if the past is any indication, is not going to provide good, neutral, objective information... and is going to control .. manipulate.. and give misleading or false information as to actual information on the subject of Technocracy Technate design... and the history and present situation of connected ideas. I would appreciate a cold and hard look being given http://technocracy.wikia.com/wiki/Technocracy_Wiki this whole series of articles with the view of either deleting the whole bunch now... or removing Isenhand from Administration. Thank you for your consideration. I am leaving a similar message now to several people in order to get a change of direction going for this issue. Tbonepickensetc (Talk) 16:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Michael. --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 15:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Images for deletion
Great job on deleting all the unused images. I was going to delete some today but you appear to have gotten all of them already. I thought that would take all month even with you, Tom, and I deleting them. Drewton  ( Drewton's Holocron ) 17:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Sockpuppetry
Ah, I see. Well, either way, he didn't let that be known so it's fairly safe to say that this qualifies as deception, which is the literal definition/interpretation of our current Sockpuppet Policy. Because it's also ban evasion, I'd say that Tom's edit is clearly justified. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 21:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

RE:Deletions
Err...I hate to ruin the celebration, but I just remembered this. Drewton  ( Drewton's Holocron ) 01:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Delidian Vao
If you have time, please look on this article. It SHOUTS for improvement!Odysseas-spartan-53 16:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Categories
Thanks! I hope everyone likes how I'm doing it. &mdash; Aiddat  ( Holonet ) ( Additions to the archives )  19:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete it!
Please, delete this. Do you have any suggestions for this?<tt><font color="#7BA05B">Odysseas-Spartan<font color="#4B5320"> 53 </tt>| 09:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, dude.

Just wonderin' why my "Articles by Darth blight" thingy......thing....page.... was deleted?

I'm not complaining, just wondering.

RE: Deletions?
what-what-what?!?

That can't be right.....I went to my user page and saw that the link I kept to there was red....I followed it to see why, and it said you deleted it......

Darth blight (Talk) 13:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)