Star Wars Fanon talk:Requests for adminship/Archive1


 * Post your comments here

Ahem....I think Ewoksfist should be an admin. -Di'e Go Am'er'ez

Why doesn't it mention TempMan?

If i had admin i would destroy anyone who would vandalize my pages like how Jonny The Vandal and Willy On Wheels did. Thank goodness Jonny and Willy got banned and blocked by editing. In canon they take they get carried away with their admin. but if i had admin i wuold be sure that never happens.
 * Uh, Wikimaniac, actually Johnny isn't blocked. TempMan | Talk 17:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The problem is: WHO GIVES ADMIN STATUS TO USERS? I'll try to ask Angela. TempMan | Talk 11:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Any of the Wikia staff can grant admin status; usually the community staff (Angela, sannse, KJ, and myself) will do it. Can you guys discuss among yourselves a little more about who would be good choices and agree on a list of people who should be admins? We'll keep stopping by to see how it's going and push the buttons when you're ready! Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, let's discuss. But, uhm, it seems i'll have to wait before the others come in. TempMan | Talk 18:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Uhhh...could you explain the voting procedure with a little more detail? - comment posted by IP 69.xxx (Diego Amerez?)

Remember to Log In, it makes communication easier Right now i was thinking of two possible methods: 1 - giving a value to every vote, based on the alignment (support is equal to +1, oppose is equal to -1, and neutral is equal to 0) and if the sum of the three alignments is greater than X (we decide the number), we assign the candidate admin status. Example, +1*50 s + (-1)*20 o + 0*10 n = 30, if 30 is greater than X, then the candidate is elected.

2 - Another method would be a Wikipedia model, the candidate must get X% (we decide the number) of supporting votes to be elected, where opposing and neutral votes are mostly used to comment why you feel the candidate shouldn't be elected. Example, 75 s, 20 o and 5 n would give 75/100 = 75% of consensus, and if 75% is greater than X%, the candidate is elected.

--TempMan | Talk 06:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Trouble
Response from Angela:
 * I'm not going to unblock anyone who has been involved in page move vandalism, and I'm not going to make vandals into sysops. TempMan is Johnny the Vandal. Wikimaniac is the same user as Ewoksfist and has at least 6 other usernames. Angela (talk) 23:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Now, this is REALLY strange She means i AM Johnny, and that Ewoksfist is a fake user. And she says Wikimaniac has at least six other accounts. Just wait a while and we'll see that Wikimaniac is also Willy on Wheels TempMan | Talk 07:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

FALSE. It would be more likely for it to be some other user. Remember i only have ONE account. I am not Ewoksfist or Willy On Wheels. Remember that. I am my own user. that theory of Tempman being johnny sounds more true than That. Besides i wanted WOW to.

Try to tell that to Angela on Wikia! I'm curious to see if she assumes good faith... oh, we can also ask Mindspillage... Anyway i've discovered WHO acted as Johnny... my fucking brother, damn... we have two different PCs but they are connected via LAN and he is the host... and the IPs are identical, it seems (the Whois says so) So if Angela used the CheckUser she saw the two IPs to be identical  No one will believe this, probably, but it's the truth  TempMan | Talk 22:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

User Votes
I vote Pinata because he is great at correcting pages. I also vote for myself because i would make sure that no user gets carried away with the delete and block log. Tell me how you feel for me voting for you Pinata. - Wikimaniac

Number of Administrators
We need more than 3 or 4 administrators. Whoever volunteered should be made an administrator because if this site has a small community, then we need at least 8-10 administrators. --MaulYoda 03:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

AT LAST SOME IMPROVEMENTS! TempMan | Talk 13:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)