Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best the Star Wars Fanon Wiki has to offer.

What makes a featured article or what article should you nominate to feature? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...


 * 1) ...be well written and detailed
 * 2) ...be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) ...have a sufficient proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
 * 9) ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 2 or more supports than any other article and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!!

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Current Standings
These standings are determined by who has the most votes. This may, however, not be the way the winner is determined. Also, oppositions will lower the amount of votes you have, as long as they're for a good reason. Neutral does nothing.


 * 1) Dan Eardornn (6)
 * 2) Krad Erron, Alpha-Ø4 (3)
 * 3) Darth Drim'n (1)
 * 4) Darth Plagueis, Zak Starfighter (0)
 * 5) Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic III: Attack of the Sith-Gods (-3)

=Nominations=

Support
I think I wrote it really well.

Support
Not really long, but good to me.

Oppose

 * 1) It's not FA quality. There's just not enough there. - Brandon Rhea 05:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree with Brandon Rhea, not FA quality Swerto 15:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I think this is as done as it will get for me. It's a well done article. --Nightmare975 19:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good article, one of my favorites.
 * 3) Good article man

Oppose

 * 1) A bit short, not upto FA quality IMHO. [[Image:DarthAb.gif]] Sith Council Sith CampaignSith Empire 21:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) While I enjoyed reading up this character, I don't think it is up to FA quality at the moment. If you were to make the history a bit longer through more elaboration and such, along with writing a longer lead in for the SW Fanon Main Page, then I would change my vote. - Brandon Rhea 23:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Lacking orriginality... It seems alot like all those other sith lord articles I read... you need more to stand it out other than a picture of Disturbed and a name Swerto 15:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * Comment-How's the intro now?--Nightmare975 01:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment-Like the picture though... disturbed rules Swerto 15:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Obi-Fore
 * 2) Great job. - Brandon Rhea 23:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Everything you do seems to be good. And this is probably your best. Cosmis 01:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Good article.
 * 5) User:Obi-Too
 * 6) Weak Support - Hmm...the length is impressive, although some elements appear rather cliche...pretty good job, though! =D Cheers, My Name is Helen (Talk) (Contribs) (Helen) [[Image:CortanaRR.jpg|15px]] 06:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Weak Support - Hmm...the length is impressive, although some elements appear rather cliche...pretty good job, though! =D Cheers, My Name is Helen (Talk) (Contribs) (Helen) [[Image:CortanaRR.jpg|15px]] 06:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Sorry dude. It's just too long. Needs to be shortened to trim out the unneccessary details.

Neutral

 * This is probably my best article. It's the first extremely long one and it's fairly well written in my opinion.
 * Too many templates, I think they should be moved to the talk page.
 * Agree with Squishy, and you probably misspelled husband at least eight times. -- [[Image:JM76Sig.gif]] Talk to an Admin Mind Trick Jedi Library 23:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've made some changes.
 * Detail=better, in my eyes. No detail = boring.
 * That is the way I see it.

Support

 * 1) My first article and so far, my best one Xepeyon 02:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I'll vote for this.
 * 1) I'll vote for this.

Support

 * 1) My best article yet. Long, detailed, pics and all that. A very good article.

Oppose

 * 1) Pretty good. Needs to be longer. Nice idea but include more levels. Since the KotOR series are RPGs, the main character's name should be created by the player, and you should have used a nameless name like Jedi Exile from KotOR II. Also General Carth Onasi? General is an ground army rank. He is an admiral of the Republic Navy. Also kind of try to use diffrent species than Twi'leks, Miralukas, and Wookiees like in previous KotORs. Also make new droids of diffrent models. Also since previous KotORs weren't release on the PS2, it isn't likely it will be made for PS3. If you change these I will change my vote.
 * 2) Too short for an RPG and doesn't give me that KotOR feel. Too unsatisfactory.
 * 3) I agree with all the above.
 * 4) I also agree with all of the above. Brandon Rhea 20:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Probably my best thought out article. It isn't of epic length but I believe its worth considering. Kyp Fisto 03:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It's not as long as most FAs, but that was pretty good. Xepeyon 04:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) it isn't long but its still good i prefer to read one page of a well written character rather then an entire three pages about some nonsense that the author cam up with. [User:Mr.missouri|Mr.missouri]]

support

 * 1) Well, it's my best and longest article, so I figure that if I have a chance at winning this, it's with this article. Zak Starfighter 11:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) It's not a bad article, however, it could be a little longer and there are a lot of red links. For now I'm saying no.

Nomination
Personally, I think the page titled 'Ordo' should be nominated. I know, I wrote it, but it is well written.

support

 * 1) It's not as long as some articles here but I think it's my best. JS undefined