Template talk:Bright

Ridiculous
That template is starting to get incredibly annoying. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 00:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * What does it do? I don't see anything special.&mdash;Darthtyler (Talk) 01:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

It's blinking. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see it blinking.&mdash;Darthtyler (Talk) 02:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Well it is. That's what bright does. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 03:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I personally enjoy it. It serves a purpose. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 03:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * It serves no purpose whatsoever. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

When you just say "This article is uber-awesome!", you aren't taken as seriously than if you say "This article is ." Therefore, it serves as a means of more forcefully getting your point across. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 03:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * EDIT: I would have created the template at Template: Blink, but that is already in use. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 03:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm getting my point across here just fine without it. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Not fine enough for me. It's not bold man. As in kind of bold. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 03:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, if you want to use childish templates, I guess there's no way I can stop you...for now. - Brandon Rhea  <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 03:56, 7 December 2008 (UTC)