Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written with enough detail to tell the entire story accurately and appropriately, though it does not have to be anywhere near the size that FAs should be as the Good Article main page states that some “cannot reach FA status as of yet due to its limited content”.
 * 2) &hellip;have at least five links to articles on Star Wars Fanon (if applicable).
 * 3) &hellip;be unbiased, neutral point of view.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances.
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;have all proper era icons.
 * 7) &hellip;not be tagged with any form of improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 8) &hellip;have a 150 word introduction that can be used in the Good Article History.
 * 9) &hellip;have absolutely no red links.
 * 10) &hellip;have a well detailed History section, and one that is complete if the character’s story is not continuing in novels/comics/etc., and a Post mortem section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 11) &hellip;have a Personality and traits section for a character and Characteristics section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle, etc.
 * 12) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Conrad Bac (5)
 * 2) The Fanon Menace/Season 1 (4)
 * 3) New Confederacy of Independent Systems (-2)

Support

 * 1) At first I really had no intention of expanding this past the stub that it was about a week ago, but after awhile I wanted to work on some obscure characters in a timeline that I never really fleshed out. I spent the week working on this and I think it came out much better than I anticipated. Do you? I hope so. Vote and let me know! - President Brandon Rhea [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom)   (Accomplishments)  05:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Very well done, as always. Dexington 15:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Typical Rhea article . Not as long as some of your others, but still very good.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Very good. -- Squishy Vic HoloNet 209 04:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Normally I wouldn't vote for my own article, but since this isn't really my own article, I feel I can vote. I've been working really hard on this the past few days and really feel that it is up to GA standards. I've expanded Part I and Part II, added many pictures, and even a Behind the Scenes. I would really appreciate your feedback. Thank You. --  Tesh  162  13:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Very interesting idea. With no article like it to compare with, I would say it is GA. Dexington 15:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Good article and has my vote, but please accommodate with what I wrote in the HP review Nix that, I misread something.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Good, good. I like this. -- Squishy Vic HoloNet 209 04:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Like Tesh, I normally wouldn't vote for my own article (although most of the work on this one has been done by Tesh), but I really want to see this one make it, even more than I wanted Ryluk to make it, if you can believe that. --Ryluk Shouja(The Mukhabarat 07:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Only real reason was redlinks, but I was on leave when it happend.TroybAllSpark Quest contribs[[Image:Troyb.jpg|30px]] 23:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) The culture is basically non-existent. As you told me on my talk page yourself, there's just so much more you can put in there. As a matter of fact, it's only five sentences long. How is that possibly enough for a government that lasts for 10,000 years? Also, the one-liners in the astrography sentence just aren't enough. If you want to have an astrograhy section that lists all of the planets taken over, then you need to explain IN DETAIL how each one was taken over. Other than that, you know my personal opinion on all of this, but that has nothing to do with GA standards. - President Brandon Rhea [[Image:Presidentialseal.gif|27px]] (Pressroom)   (Accomplishments)  00:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Per above. You dead seriously need to expand the Culture section. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't even have to say it, but per above. -- Squishy Vic HoloNet 209 04:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)