Star Wars Fanon:Requests for adminship

This page is used to elect sysops, people who can correct pages, delete, block harmful users, and so on.

Since there are no sysops except neomessiah, we need someone else. The community is small, so 9 or 10 admins are enough for now. Who wants to be an admin?

Please post your comments on the talk page.

Candidates

 * Aiddat
 * Ewoksfist
 * Di'e Go Am'er'ez
 * Pinata
 * Wikimaniac
 * MaulYoda

Option 1
There are three subsections, support (s), oppose (o), neutral (n). If (s + o + n) > X, then the user gets sysop rights. s = +1, o = -1, n = 0.

Option 2
There are three subsections, support (s), oppose (o), neutral (n). The candidate is elected only if the percentage of supporters is greater than X%. The "oppose" and "neutral" sections are mostly used to comment why one feels that the candidate shouldn't be elected.

Option 3
If after at least a week, one user has more votes than every other user with no oppositions, that user becomes a sysop. The second place user also becomes a sysop. If there is a tie, both users become sysops.

How To Nominate

 * Find the name of the user you want to nominate
 * Place your username under support, objection, or neutral. You can also add a comment after your username. Please add the * (star) symbol before your vote so we can order the list in a proper way.
 * You are allowed to vote for yourself, if you wish.
 * You are allowed to nominate more than one person but you can only nominate each person once.

Current Standings
These standings are determined by who has the most votes. This may, however, not be the way the winner is determined.


 * 1) MaulYoda (7)
 * 2) Wikimaniac (4)
 * 3) Aiddat, Pinata, Ewoksfist (3)
 * 4) Di'e Go Am'er'ez (2)


 * vote candidates here

MaulYoda
Support Oppose
 * 1. I learned from looking threw the history that MaulYoda helped improve the main page and this page. If he can do that, imagine what else he could do as an administrator . Nihilusdue
 * 2. Hey, you improved the main page! If you are given admin powers you will do fine TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3. MaulYoda 19:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4. He's already helped out quite a bit, I think he's proved his devotion to our cause.--Pinata 21:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5. MaulYoda is a very dedicated member of the community. I think I speak for everyone (besides the vandals) when I say: We will all feel a little safer with MaulYoda as an admin.Ewoksfist 03:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 6. My vote is on you (thanks for correcting the vandalism)-Darth Fury
 * 7 I've been here for a while and i haven't heard/read one bad thing about him. He also reversed damage that the vandals did David lill 09:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Wikimaniac
Support Oppose
 * 1. He fails at grammar, but he is unlikely to abuse admin powers TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. I will get block and ban any evil vandal. - Wikimaniac
 * 3. He's improved his grammar quite a bit since I got here, and he seems to truly want to help. Besides, he voted for me. --Pinata 15:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4 David lill 09:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral


 * 1. While I do not oppose Wikimaniac being an admin, I am unsure whether he would be effective enough in removing vandals. Ewoksfist 23:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Ewoksfist
Support (UTC)
 * 1. My vote for you TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. Ewoksfist 03:36, 31 May 2006
 * 3. I think if Ewoksfist can spend a lot of time at home, he would be a valuable asset to this community as an administrator. MaulYoda 01:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Pinata
Support Oppose
 * 1. New, but unlikely to abuse power TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. He is the type that is a great page corrector and is most likely defeat evil vandals. - Wikimaniac
 * 3.Pinata is a great choice for admin. He is likely to be a massive benefit to the site by categorizing, banning vandals... Gnosis is knowledge 15:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Di'e Go Am'er'ez
Support
 * 1. Unlikely to abuse power, and he has been here for a while TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * 2. I think Di'e Go Am'er'ez would make a good admin. Ewoksfist 23:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Aiddat
Support
 * 1. Unlikely to abuse power TempMan | Talk 13:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2. Aiddat is brilliant, and also has the greater good of the wiki as his goal. My vote for him! -Di'e Go Am'er'ez


 * 3. My vote is for Aiddat. I believe he would greatly improve SW Fanon. Ewoksfist 23:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral