Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Due to the High Priests being very overwhelmed with nominations, we will not be accepting any more than five nominations for the coming rounds. This is subject to change in coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 7) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page showcase box.
 * 8) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled, even if they are stubs.
 * 9) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 10) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) If there are already five nominees on the page, you may not nominate anymore. If more than five nominees are posted, anything after the fifth nominee will be removed.
 * 5) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Rohi, Flame battle droid (9)
 * 2) Order of Sovereignty, WraithX-Beta Interceptor (6)
 * 3) New CIS, Cabal (1)

Support

 * 1) Its a good article, though rather short. I think its pretty well written, and even if it doesn't make GA Status, I'll be interested in how people suggest to improve it. S. p hobia MY ears... mouth... eyes...
 * 2) Great article! 14:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Awesome article.--'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 14:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Good article.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 19:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- [[Image:JM76sig.jpg|90px]] Council Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) [[Image:XEPE.JPG|100px]] Say it like it is... Or it was. 21:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
*Intro could be expanded, and perhaps another picture. 13:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Picture is coming. Intro has had some slight expansion. --Shadowphobia 18:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Another Pic Added! 18:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand the article is short, but I really don't know how to give it too much expansion. Suggestions are welcome! 18:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 13:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Should win. 14:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Awesome article.--'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 14:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Deserves to be a GA.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 19:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Same reasons as last week (and every other week, for that matter.) I still believe it's too short, and could be expanded. -- Victor  ( talk ) 19:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ditto. -- [[Image:JM76sig.jpg|90px]] Council Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Every week, for the last few months, it's the same thing. Here here.
 * 4) Violates rule 9, per Squishy. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * You cannot vote, Troyb. Your count should be at one.
 * Wait...I'm right, right? I'm doubting myself now.
 * I think your right..maybe hmm I cant remember. Wierd.Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 13:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Why wouldn't Troyb be able to vote?[[Image:CurrentBigThingSig.jpg|150px]] 13:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yah?Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 13:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Because he nominated it. If I recall, you can't vote for yourself anymore. That may just be in UotW and SysOp Elections though.
 * When it comes to some sort of user election/nomination, you cannot nominate nor vote for yourself. When it comes to articles, you can vote for your own articles. -- Victor  ( talk ) 20:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh okay. My bad.

Alright Troyb, check this out. This article has been put up for FA/GA for almost two months now. I just went and read the whole article. The history is very small. Look at my USSR article. It's my largest government article and I wrote that in four days. Before there was GAs, I nominated it. It didn't win the first week, but it won the second week. My point is, the history section is the most important part. The reason USSR's history is so big because most of it was war. Your New CIS/GDE War isn't that big. Expand that and put that into your New CIS article. Either that, or stop nominating it.

Support

 * 1) Its lengthy, its got quotes, citations, everything you can ask for.--'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 14:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I like the article. Good IMO.[[Image:CurrentBigThingSig.jpg|150px]] 14:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per above, and lol, its even sourced(probably the only article on the site).  Pinky Talk 15:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Very good, even FA.Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 16:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Almost FA, but definitely GA.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 19:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Per above. -- Victor  ( talk ) 19:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Its good. The General Grievous Quote was a bit cheesy, but you took it down, and now I like it.
 * 8) Perfect! 17:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) GA worhty. -- [[Image:JM76sig.jpg|90px]] Council Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
*Please sign your votes. 14:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Worked really hard on this one for a long time, an had one DL and one HP look over it. [[Image:XEPE.JPG|100px]] Say it like it is... Or it was. 15:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I would suggest adding some quotes, but it looks good nevertheless.--'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 17:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) It's very well written and an all-around great article. The pics could be better sources, but I'm not complaining. This'll be a FA soon as well.[[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 19:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Definitely a GA.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 19:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Great article. Shadowphobia 16:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) It seems worthy of GA status. -- [[Image:JM76sig.jpg|90px]] Council Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I worked hard on this one, and tried to run through and correct the errors. Critique is welcomed and expected. :) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Very nice way to integrate scripture into SW without getting too preachy. This is a wonderful article. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 19:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good. --'Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 19:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Yes.  N@M3Le$  | Talk  | Contributions | MoaDS | Namelesennius [[Image:Namelesennius.jpg|25px]] 19:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Agreed. -- Victor  ( talk ) 19:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) I like this article.
 * 7) As do I. -- [[Image:JM76sig.jpg|90px]] Council Jedi Library [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 17:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) As I said in the HP review, the only thing I have against this article is that I didn't think of it myself! - Brandon Rhea 21:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Per Rhea.--  CurrentBigThing  ( Say It To My Face ) 21:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) A little short story-wise, but a good article nonetheless I think. Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 13:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)