Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip; be identified with proper era icons.
 * 2) &hellip; be well written, comprehensive and detailed; however, not to the extent of the requirement for a Featured Article.
 * 3) To be well written, the article must have a prose that is engaging and of a professional standard.
 * 4) To be detailed, an article must be written in an encyclopedic format with no point of view in the detail, though that detail is not excess nor irrelevant; instead, the detail must also contact all relevant major facts and plot points.
 * 5) The article must acknowledge and explore all aspects of the subject and cover every encyclopedic angle.
 * 6) The article does not need to have a finished storyline.
 * 7) The article must be clear, using a logical structure written in plain language.
 * 8) The article must follow standard writing conventions of modern English (ie, correct grammar, punctuation and spelling).
 * 9) All grammar and spelling must be one hundred percent accurate. The High Priests and voting members of the community will inspect all of it to make proper edits.
 * 10) &hellip; have an introduction of at least one-hundred and fifty (150) words that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the greater detail in the following sections.
 * 11) &hellip; follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, categorization policy, as well as all other policies.
 * 12) &hellip; contain enough images where appropriate, but the page is not cluttered or overstocked.
 * 13) &hellip; ensure that all images in said article follow the standards of sourcing in the Image policy.
 * 14) &hellip; not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination.
 * 15) &hellip; have absolutely no red links, as they must be filled with at least stubs or not be linked to at all.
 * 16) &hellip; have no links in section titles.
 * 17) &hellip; have a brief "Personality and traits" section that generalizes the character's said personality
 * 18) &hellip; be stable, meaning that it is not the subject of any edit wars and that the content does not change significantly from day to day, reversions of vandalism and improvements based on suggestions not applying.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of good article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below and add GAnom to the nominated article. Please nominate in this format:
 * === Article name ===
 * Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/0 users/0 total)
 * 1) Others will object to the nomination if they do not believe that the article is good enough at HP:Article name, which is the review page for the nominated article. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources)
 * 2) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied and vote support beneath the article's nomination

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy, which is at least one hundred (100) mainspace edits.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support the article on this page, or visit the nominee's review page to state your objections
 * 4) If you object the nomination, you must supply concrete reasons for doing so, as well as your suggestions as to how the article can be improved. If you do not provide a valid opposition, your vote will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 6) To be a Good Article on Star Wars Fanon, a nomination must have at least eleven (11) votes, of which at least four (4) must be contributed by High Priests. Articles will remain on the nominations track until they receive the required amount of votes or until the author pulls the nomination, but they need to be on the nominations track for at least one week even if they receive the required number of votes before then.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

High Priests, please be sure to place HP before each of your votes, to identify all High Priest votes.

A small blue check in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Gloaranian
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)


 * 1) I did all editing to make it qualified for the "good article" thing.-Endor chicken

Tiberius Henry Zaren
Objections and discussion – (5 High Priests/4 users/9 total)


 * 1)  Wing   msg 19:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Very good job, Wing. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 00:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Great job Wing! [[Image:AndeLeg.jpg|20px]] Arav  (talk ) 05:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Most certainly. [[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] iChat What I've done 06:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Some of it, especially the quotes, is a bit too Star Trek, but that's not a problem with the article. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 13:03, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) This certainly qualifies.
 * 7) I read it again. It'll do. -MPK, the So-Called Free Man (The Free Man's Talk Page)|undefined 15:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Need some votes? –  JM ' 76 ' Ask Archives [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|18px]] 17:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Rhadé Sarasvati Nalanda
Objections and discussion – (1 High Priests/3 users/4 total)


 * 1) My only concern is that the article is not too long, not sure if I could make it longer as I didn't really want to ramble but there's no real guide as to how long the body of the article should be other than the fact it should cover all plot points (which it does). Katana Geldar  10:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed it up, took out some of the headings. As for the images, how much does it matter they're 2D? it could be like she's in a comic. Katana Geldar  11:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed again, made it longer. Katana Geldar  06:50, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Everything's fixed. I won't lie - it's not exactly my favorite article and the sections aren't as elaborated as most GAs, but it meets GA requirements. Appropriate length is a relative term. It has to have "meat" to it, but there's no set length to a story.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 03:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Lets get this party started.... Arav the Undersith (Contact Me ) (My contributions ) 05:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) --Victor talk 06:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks guys, and of course if I decide to push it to FA status there will be extensions. <font color="#008080">Katana <font color="#008080">Geldar  12:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Raymus Drewton
Objections and discussion – (3 High Priests/4 users/7 total)


 * 1) It's similar to Tarisian Drewton, but currently I don't have any fanon material that would make an article as long. I believe I've fixed all the spelling. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 12:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Edit away the improvement tag, and it's a fine article - looks very professional.--[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 19:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes. &mdash;Victor, Sr. «discussion» 17:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) --<font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 09:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Very nice.
 * 6) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] iChat What I've done 06:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Got votes? –  JM ' 76 ' Ask Archives [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|18px]] 17:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Shizu Lanmaw
Objections and discussion – (2 High Priests/3 users/5 total)


 * 1) Let's go. --  CurrentBigThing  ( Speak ) 17:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Everything looks good now. Nice article, and a good read.  Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 17:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Paragraphs are a bit short, but it looks fine by me otherwise. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 19:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Spell cheak finds no incorret grammer. Great article CBT. --<font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 11:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] iChat What I've done 06:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Kothlis (Cruentusian War)
Objections and discussion – (4 High Priests/4 users/8 total)


 * 1) Cruentus's second GAN. Tom has been through this and I have added finishing touches, and IMO it's GA worthy. Unit 8311 18:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Hopefully Project Cruentus' 2 GA! --[[Image:AndeLeg.jpg|20px]] <font color="Green">Arav (<font color="Green" size="1">talk ) 11:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Now that the corrections have been made, this article is certainly worthy of GA status.
 * 4) Nice article. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 16:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Good article, but most of the quotes are bad. The one at the top was too thick, the ones at "The Svrav landings", "The underwater battle" sections were too goofy to take seriously, the one at "Prelude" was killed by its Vader imitation, et cetera. Regardless, the quotes don't bar this article from GA status as I see it. This project surprises me once again. Keep up the good work. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 22:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) You guys continue to impress me. I agree with MPK, the quotes are a bit different  and have cliché elements, like that "No disintegrations!" bit, but I liked this overall. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 19:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] iChat What I've done 15:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) It'll do. --Victor talk 03:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hayai Oujou
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)


 * 1) I have read over the GA requirements and this article meets them all. There were enough images. Good read. --<font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 09:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Second Battle of Bakura (Dark Order War)
Objections and discussion – (4 High Priests/5 users/9 total)


 * 1) I have spent an obscene amount of time on this article. Checking capital ship stats, calculating fighter numbers, finding names for the commanders, writing proper fleet and ground tactics, finding images, and so on for so long I don't even want to think about it. I made and nominated this article, therefore I support it. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 02:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice. Just be sure you change "Behind the Scenes" to "Behind the scenes". &mdash;Victor, Sr. «discussion» 08:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Good read. Love the pictures!--<font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 08:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Good work, PK. Unit 8311 16:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) I see nothing wrong here. THough, I would prefer the BtS section not to have bullet points.
 * 6) *I didn't want to put bullets in there either, but the only other options that I could think of were: A) Merging the Bts tidbits together into paragraphs, which wouldn't look good because most of them aren't particularly related and therefore it wouldn't be proper to combine them; and B) Have them separate, but not with bullets, which would look slightly less professional as I saw it. Neither appealed to me. The problem is that the different facts weren't substantial enough to organize in any other way. -MPK (MPK's Talk Page)|undefined 20:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Looks like you did spend a large amount of time studying up for this article. Very professional I must say. This should be the fruit of your loins. Anti-Formal  Come slang wit' me Work I've Put In 04:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Very good, very good. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 13:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] iChat What I've done 15:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) Went all-out didn't you? Excellent job. --[[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|35px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 03:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Johun Othone
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/1 user/1 total)


 * 1) I tried my best to adhere to the Good Article Requirements  Anti-Formal  Come slang wit' me Work I've Put In 05:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Exodus from Had Abaddon
Objections and discussion – (3 High Priests/2 users/5 total)


 * 1) Look's good.
 * 2) I don't see any problems. Good grief. Do the HPs need revitalizing, too? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Seems fine, per IRC. –  JM ' 76 ' Ask Archives [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|18px]] 23:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 06:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Well, since the people who tend to do line by line High Priest reviews haven't found anything, I'll support this as well now. I just hope that there's not a lot in there for Ataru to find and yell at us about.  - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea  <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 16:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Its fine.--<font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 05:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Kal'Shabbol Civil War
Objections and discussion – (3 High Priests/3 users/6 total)


 * 1) One BR article reviewed. Check. Very good. I like all the LOTR images. But I guess that's my personal bias. BTW, the quote at the top of the page seems to resemble a William T. Sherman quote. I'll try to review Exodus tomorrow.
 * 2) *That's because it is a William T. Sherman quote. - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea  <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 21:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fancy that.
 * 4) Looks good. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Per the IRC. –  JM ' 76 ' Ask Archives [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|18px]] 23:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) --[[Image:Darthtomsig.png|163px]] <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contributions) 06:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Well, since the people who tend to do line by line High Priest reviews haven't found anything, I'll support this as well now. I just hope that there's not a lot in there for Ataru to find and yell at us about.  - <font color="#1A2BBB">Brandon Rhea  <font color="#1A2BBB">(talk) <font color="#1A2BBB">(contribs) 16:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Da. Its also fine. --<font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 05:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Daklif Ordo
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/3 users/3 total)


 * 1) Hopefully long enough. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 02:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) --Victor talk 06:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) It qualifies. <font color=#00416A>Arav the Undersith <font color=Blue>(<font color=#C3B091>Contact Me ) <font color=#00416A>(<font color=#C3B091>My contributions ) 05:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Travot Terrin
Objections and discussion – (0 High Priests/0 users/0 total)