Forum:CT:FW quality rule change

It's come to our attention that the quality standards for featured works are a bit nebulous. Here's what it says right now:

It was brought up by Wylind awhile ago that the Archivists basically have a free reign in evaluating FWNs. He said he'd get to work on changing that, but falling in love and getting married is quite the distraction. That said, now that the FW system has been in place for some time, I feel that would be beneficial to provide some guidelines as far as what the Archivists are looking for in a Featured Work's quality.

Currently, the system tells you to produce quality but gives no benchmarks on a work's quality before the Archivists review it. This was originally intended to not place limitations on a subjective evaluation, but now seems to be more of a hindrance. Another one of my esteemed colleagues, Goodwood and I put our heads together and we've come up with this addendum to rule 3 outlined above.

We would also like to change something on Rule 4, which discusses the excerpt, and stipulate that the excerpt must be between 150 and 300 words to give a clearer guideline.

Your votes, comments, and other feedback on this idea are very welcome. This thread will run for two weeks unless otherwise decided by an administrator. Atarumaster88  ( Talk page ) 03:11, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Support this proposal

 * 1) Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 03:11, January 11, 2011 (UTC)