Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Request for Seership archive/Darth Wylind

Support

 * 1) I’ve been thinking a lot lately about how we need more Seers. We only have six, and I just don’t feel that’s enough. I’ve put a lot of thought into a few candidates who I think would be good Seers, and I’m nominating one of them now (although that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t nominate the others). That would be Wylind. He’s got a good head on his shoulders, as one of our other Seers just said, and he knows what he’s doing with FA reviews and general article quality. He’s helpful, as a good Seer should be, and he understands the standards for good and featured articles now. He’s not all that active reviewing wise, but at this point I’m overlooking that. Very few people (read: like, one person) who are non-Seers actually take the time to review, so I’m not using that, in my opinion, as a qualification. I think Wylind, who has told me that he’d be active if he is elected, is a great choice. Brandon Rhea  Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 05:55, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) He knows what he's doing. He may have strong emotions, but I don't think that they'll affect his judgment.-- Josh Bender Talk 06:05, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Sure.- Chosen One So the Prophecy says... ''' 06:06, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Good stuff. &mdash;  JM ' 76 ' Droid IRC [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|16px|link=:Category:Articles by Jedi Master 76]] 06:14, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Nacen (Talk) 03:39, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) From what I've seen, he seems to have a good head on his shoulders.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 04:47, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1)  Unit 8311 [[Image:1110 Big small.jpg|20px]] Talk!  16:44, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) --Darth tom  (Message me) (Contributions) 16:48, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) For now. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 18:05, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Comments
To add on to why I feel we need more Seers, while we may not have an insanely long queue, the same few Seers are reviewing all of the nominations while some people are only doing a few. Now everyone should at least look at each one, but I think those same people are getting tired of doing in depth reviews and actually doing corrections while others skate by in pointing out a few instances of errors here and there, all while overlooking pretty major things. All Seers should be able to get to the point where they only have to review a few of the nominees in depth as opposed to all of them. Those that don’t do in depth reviews would be able to spot anything the other Seers missed. - Brandon Rhea  (talk) 06:01, October 11, 2009 (UTC)


 * Just to clarify, Wylind officially accepted the nomination via IRC. - Brandon Rhea Alliance Starbird.svg (talk) 16:02, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. --Wylindsig.png (Conference Room)  17:48, October 12, 2009 (UTC)