Thread:SavageOpress1138/@comment-104549-20161231020825

I haven't become embroiled in the comment debate here, but I think Boomdodger raises an important point here. If the article author is, as represented, only 9 years old (comment way at the bottom of the page), that presents a major policy concern—and not local SWF policies, but the BIG policies. The third paragraph in the introductory section makes clear that using Wikia (with or without registering for an account) constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Service, which themselves require verification that the user is over 13.

I personally agree that the article quality isn't great, but I don't think that would be a reason for any admin action. But an age violation goes way beyond just a simple article content issue. You might want to step in sooner rather than later to protect SWFanon. 