Star Wars Fanon:Featured articles/Nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best the Star Wars Fanon Wiki has to offer.

What makes a featured article or what article should you nominate to feature? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be a good article.
 * 2) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 3) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 4) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 5) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 6) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 7) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 8) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page featured box.
 * 9) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled.
 * 10) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Charateristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?.

Nomination:


 * 1) First, all Good articles will be added to the nominations automatically.

Voting:


 * 1) Second, the Decreton Lords, and they alone, will vote on each good article. They will review by adding comments, critique, and feedback on the articles up for nomination. They will vote to whether or not the article is of featured article status or not, and once their decisions are unanimous, the article will become a featured one.

After the win:
 * 1) If an article is voted in by the Decreton Lords, it will be added to the list of featured articles, the upcoming article queue, and to the history of featured articles.

The nominated template will be added at the top of the good articles that are nominated.

Current Standings

 * 1) Flame battle droid (2/5)
 * 2) Lorsanan'sondora (0/5)
 * 3) Order of Sovereignty (0/5)
 * 4) Prophecies of The Skywalker (1/5)
 * 5) Rafe Richter (0/5)
 * 6) Rohi (3/5)

=Nominations= Remember, only the Decreton Lords will vote below.

Disapprove/complaints

 * Expand introduction. Lacks details, because each section is only a few sentences long; should be and can be greatly expanded. Personality/traits section could be greatly expanded and a talents section should be added.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * So far I expaneded the introduction, and the personality/traits section. I also included the Talents section. I have yet to work on expanding the size 4 sections.
 * Ditto Vic. 20:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Per above. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 21:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This was harder to read. I think it's because the article is laid out like a list of exploits that have not quite the detail that I enjoy in other Featured Articles. If the (size 4?) headings were expanded to more substantial paragraphs, and the plotline made more intriguing, this would certainly be on par with the first article to have that picture in its infobox. --C3PO the Dragon Slayer 6,000,000 forms of communication

Approve

 * 1) Very well done and is definitely FA material. -- Victor  ( talk ) 20:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Well-written and believable. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 01:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Believable? I'm guessing you're reffering to Darth Tyler? --Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY)[[Image:TylerLogo.jpg|20px]] 04:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually I was saying that it could actually have happened. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 16:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I just can't see it being an FA. The article sections are only one paragraph long, in fact, the longest section is the description. It also fails rule 11. Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 09:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Approve

 * 1) Up to FA standards. -- Victor  ( talk ) 23:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Another example of Solus's genius. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 01:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have genius? O.o Shweet. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  02:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I like it, alot. Although I think it should also be categorised as "Avian and airborne sentient species". Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 09:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Never thought to do that. Tis done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Lacks era icon. Everything else is perfect. -- Victor  ( talk ) 20:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Icons have been added. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Approve

 * 1) FA material. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Behind the Scenes needs to be Behind the scenes. External Links needs to be External links. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * While I personally believe that looks horrible, I have complied. - Brandon Rhea 04:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thats how it was in our Layout guide, however you capitalized it in the new version. It's not proper grammar, so it shouldn't be capitalized. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Behind the Scenes needs to be Behind the scenes. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Sovereignty Campaign section should be expanded. Behind the Scenes should be Behind the scenes, and See Also should be See also. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

=Formerly featured articles=

{{Scroll box
 * content=

Current Standings

 * 1) Alu-mann Vissel (0/5)
 * 2) Battle of Dathomir (Corruption War) (0/5)
 * 3) Darth Fang (0/5)
 * 4) Di'e Go Am'er'ez (0/5)
 * 5) Fourso Taa (0/5)
 * 6) Great Galactic Civil War (0/5)
 * 7) IG-13 (0/5)
 * 8) Krion (0/5)
 * 9) Ontuse Karaane (0/5)
 * 10) Qui-Gon Jinn (0/5)
 * 11) Second Mandalorian Wars (0/5)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is way too short, biography is too short, personality and traits, talents/abilities all too short.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Per above.

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is way too short, pictures must be spread out, era icons fixed up, and behind the scenes/aftermath/appearances could be added.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Per above. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What he said.

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is missing entirely, pictures and layout must be fixed, mess at the bottom of the page needs to be cleaned up  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro does not exist, has ugly userbox-style madeby template and messy code. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is way too short, biography is too short.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Too short article. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Need some major reworking done.

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is way too short, biography format is wrong, lacks talents section, personality section is way too short. Lacks pictures.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The lack of intro is bugging me and so is the lack of photos. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is way too short, pictures must be organized better or some removed, as well as the layout, and unnecessary templates must be moved to the talk page.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It's kinda messy. Expand intro and resize/remove some of the pictures. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Lacks introduction, pictures are badly organized, biography is way too short.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Lacks intro, is way too short. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Lacks intro, has no detail and lacks a lot of sections a planet could have, such as geography, demographics, history and governments.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Way too short. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is way too short.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Expand intro. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is too short, template of WK207 universe on the page instead of talk page, formatting of headers is wrong, and has Out of universe context in the article.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro is too short and so is the actual article. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove/complaints

 * Intro is too short, way too many redlinks everywhere.  Victor  ( talk ) 09:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Per above. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 11:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * }}
 * }}