Star Wars Fanon:Request for Archivistship/Archive/Katana Geldar

The following is an archive of Katana Geldar's successful request for Archivistship, from October 6, 2008 to October 17, 2008.

Support

 * 1) After careful screening, I believe this user has the fanon expertise to help with this, and she accepted the nom on my talk page. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 06:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Yup. --Victor [[Image:Vic sig logo.png|15px]] talk 06:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Perfect for this job.-- Lord Bender Nightmare975  06:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) --Arav the Undersith (Contact Me ) (My contributions ) 08:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Per all the above. -- Michaeldsuarez [[Image:Sabersmilygreend.jpg|20px]] ( Talk ) ( Deeds ) 12:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Yes. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 13:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Unit 8311 [[Image:1110 Big small.jpg|20px]] Talk!  14:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Per Ataru. -- Kathkira talk  06:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) For now. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 16:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments

 * Seems to be a little sporadic in activity. --[[Image:Darth tom sig.png|100px]] (talk) (contributions) 16:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Ataru, what do you mean by "careful screening"? Do you mean a series of difficult questions related to this position, or what? The reason I ask is because, after searching the history on the GAN page, Katana has not voted or even commented once on any noms in the last month. I did not look back any further than a month, since I didn't feel it to be necessary. My point is, if you're basing these noms on screening, then boy, I'd love to be screened too. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 23:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Since when does this have anything to do with Good article voting? Someone doesn't have to take GAN voting into consideration when looking to see who would be best on this review board if they don't want to, since it has nothing to do with Good articles. Based on conversations I've had with Ataru on IRC, I believe that his "careful screening" would be her works of fan fiction and her reviews of other works of fan fiction on TheForce.Net boards, where Katana is an active member in the Fan Fiction boards. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I see. I was not aware of her reviews on TheForce.net. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 23:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Rhea's done a good job of answering this for me, so I'll be brief. For one, I don't give a wooden nickel about how active someone is in GAN, and the misconception that a user's critical judgment is somehow founded in that institution is well, absurd to me. Rhea is correct-I based my screenings on a number of things, including the quality of her own fan-fiction, and her own activities on TF.N. Particularly notable was the fact that, based on her TF.N postings, she does look to be involved in SWF and seeks to promote fan-fiction as well as encyclopediac articles. As for the idea of how I pick people to be screened, I will support the candidates I choose based on the criterion I have set for what I believe is a good member of this board. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 23:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * is blushing*, thanks guys. Katana Geldar  09:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)