Thread:Sakaros/@comment-1998339-20190211181842/@comment-104549-20190211214255

That one was a slightly more borderline case than I initially thought, since there was what appeared to be commentary on the quality of the article in question. But given the dearth of content in the actual article, I can't really say with a straight face that the discussion of the upcoming work and its characters (which dominated the comment) was comparative to the Lego article. I pared it down to the non-spam part.

And added!