Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-31421-20151014160335/@comment-1169345-20151016172354

The real, evil Ataru--the one we know and love--is also the hero/protagonist Ataru, or maybe anti-hero since you are evil? This copycat--you--is the villain/antagonist. So while I guess "evil" is the incorrect term, copycat ataru is still the villain/antagonist.. Imposter.

I really think that the approval process should be streamlined rather than expanded or inflated. Featured works are already the slowest moving, most laborious and time-consuming process we have and for good reason. Tack on quite possibly the largest approval count required of all consensus-based achievements on the site and well, we won't be seeing many works churn out at all....or less than already. I am all for allowing the entire community to critique and analyze works but not to vote. ONLY because we will NEVER see anything new go through then. So having only archivists vote would theoretically speed up the process due to fewer required votes, less bureaucracy and creates more incentive to be an archivist (one of the talking points of this CT, no?).

Now, if you really feel we should have more voice per entry then expanding to require 4 or 5 archivists could be an alternativce; conversely you COULD keep user vote but make it 2-3 archivists and 2 reg users.

Anyway, that is all I can think of for now. So I shall depart until you respond.