Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Per the majority opinion of the High Priests, due to the High Priests not being as overwhelmed with nominations as they were in the past, we will now be accepting TEN nominations per round but no more than ten. This is subject to change in the coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 7) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page showcase box.
 * 8) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled, even if they are stubs.
 * 9) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 10) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Characteristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) If there are already five nominees on the page, you may not nominate anymore. If more than five nominees are posted, anything after the fifth nominee will be removed.
 * 5) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * Battle of Almania (Sith Crusade) (3)
 * Tulak Hord, Dark Magic, Force shield (2)
 * SlipKnoT (band) (1)
 * Vujaara dragon (0)

=Nominations=

Support

 * 1) Renominating, and it is a great article. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per last week. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Despite the fact that I hate anime or manga or whatever it is and that there could be a few too many quotes, it is a very good article. Dexington 14:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Renominating. Like I said, I believe it to be GA material. -- Victor  ( talk ) 04:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It's good. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Renominating. I don't know why this wasn't put in the FA noms, it had no against votes and no opposition. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per ^. Better than my article last week that made it to the FA noms. Dexington 14:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If we were to go by your argument, Solus, then my Dark Magic should've also been GA last week because it had no opposition votes either. Like I mentioned on my talk page, I only made the top 3 voted articles as GAs (they were all tied). Remember, it was you guys who wanted voting, so number of votes is what determines GAs, not simply because they lack opposition. -- Victor  ( talk ) 03:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * While I agree with the top 3 voted ones being GAs, I think it would help more if the HPs actually voted. They write their reviews and stuff, but I don't think they voted last week. Their reviews say how they stand on the article, but it apparently doesn't count into the votes. Dexington 03:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would help too. Like you said, they don't vote, and it could help show their support or opposition for an article as they state in their reviews if they were all to vote. Also, I know Solus and Jedi Master 76 always vote, but the other three HPs never do, as far as I've seen. -- Victor  ( talk ) 03:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) A Force power. I blew my mind trying to think up creative ways to use this thing. :P - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, very GA status. -- Victor  ( talk ) 03:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Worked nice n' hard on this one. [[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 02:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
talk:Solus| (Bird of Prey) ]] 13:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) It's good and detailed, but it has a few major problems, per the HP review. - Solus [[User

Support

 * 1) Worked nice, interesting and a lot of hard work went into this. Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 13:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Interesting idea, I suppose its GA quality. Won't go much farther than that though. Dexington 13:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I'm gonna have to oppose this one. The article is much too copied.  Pinky Talk 15:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * How is it "much too copied"? The story is unique, and as far as I know, Slipknot have nothing to do with Star Wars, so it's not copying anything canonical. And of course some of it's the same, it's a tribute. I'm sorry, but I don't see your opposition as a concrete reason. Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 16:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * As much as I like what Jasca did (and helped me out with the band template), some might still say that this is close to a carbon copy of the real band. At least different pictures or even a different name for the band might make it a little more creative. --  Riffsyphon  1024 14:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The whole point of the band's name being the same is that it's a tribute to them. Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 15:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * True, but can the band have a tribute or homage without using the exact name? Even just a letter could be off and it wouldn't be considered as a copy. --  Riffsyphon  1024 16:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not the exact name, the typset is different in two letters. Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 16:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)