Thread:Theorodore12345/@comment-104549-20180624185135

I removed two categories from First Brother (Jedi and Jedi Masters); I'm about to do so again, and they need to stay removed, but first it might be useful to explain why.

Per the Categorization Policy, only the most specific of a series of categories should be applied to an article. For example, take Obi-Wan Kenobi. He was a Jedi. During his life, he was also a, a Jedi Padawan, a Jedi Knight, and finally a Jedi Master. It would not be proper to add all four of those statuses; only the last counts, so an Obi-Wan article would be categorized under Jedi Masters. Further, "Jedi Masters" is more specific than the generic "Jedi", so "Jedi" wouldn't be added either.

Now let's apply that to First Brother. He's a Jedi Master, so "Jedi" is out because it's less specific. But he's also a post-Ruusan Jedi Master, which is itself more specific than "Jedi Masters", so now "Jedi Masters" is out too.

Jedi Generals can stay; both Knights and Masters were eligible to be Generals, so "Jedi Generals" and "Jedi Masters" aren't duplicative of each other, and neither is more specific than the other. The Categorization Policy kind of suggests that "Fallen Jedi" should replace all other Jedi categories, since it's the "final status" (unless the fallen Jedi was redeemed), but I'm personally a little more lenient on that one; adding the "last good Jedi status" allows readers to see where the character was before falling.

Hopefully that makes everything more clear, but reply here if you have any questions or need clarification. 