Thread:Sakaros/@comment-32105537-20190315184707/@comment-104549-20190315194953

As it happens, I'm a Soldier, so yes, I'm familiar with the order of battle. In theory, you could have categories such as "Rebel Alliance companies" and "Rebel Alliance regiments" under "Rebel Alliance military units". There are two interrelated issues:
 * First, since it's fanon, there's no "official" Rebel order of battle, so we could wind up with a dozen sub-categories of different units (companies, platoons, bridges, battalions, regiments, cohorts, legions, groups, troops, batteries...).
 * Relatedly, there may never be a "category of one": a category that only applies to one article. Take, for instance, your Ranger platoon (Rebel Alliance).  If there are no other articles about platoons, it would be the only article in a hypothetical "Rebel Alliance platoons" category, and that's a problem.

Now, that said, if you wanted to make a category called "Rebel Alliance order of battle", put your articles in there, and categorize it under "Rebel Alliance military units", I think that'd be okay. It's not a perfect fit, maybe, since "Rebel Alliance military units" is usually about individual units rather than units as structural concepts, but I think it fits better there than anywhere else.