Star Wars Fanon:Deletion page/Lightning

This page is the deletion discussion regarding Lightning. I was never really planning to do this, but I think it has to be done upon taking a look at the article again. The article fails all accepted standards across the board. The author has been told of the problems of the page (not counting story content in this regard), such as clean up and fanonification issues. Have they done anything about it? No, they haven't. It seems to me that the author is more concerned with screaming at us for stating our opinion on his garbage article than he is with actually putting in an effort to improve it. Just taking a look at this article will show you the problem with standards.

Now this brings me to another bone of contention: the quality of the story in the article. Normally, I wouldn't take it into account, but in this regard it's not exactly the storyline but rather how it's presented. The character is a complete Mary Sue, there are rampant POV issues, the talents and abilities section is one giant list and, overall, it's just really bad. I don't really need to go into anymore detail with that, because this article is generally accepted as the worst article on the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. Quite frankly, and I generally don't say things like this, this article is an insult to everyone else on this entire website because when non-SWF members discuss the Star Wars Fanon Wiki, this is article is frequently pointed to as being representative of the Star Wars Fanon standards.

Because this is likely going to be a major vote due to the controversial nature of this article, a sudden surge of keep or delete votes will not determine the article's fate if those votes come in only after a few days. Regardless of whether there is overwhelming votes for deletion or keeping, this article needs to remain on the deletion nominations track for at least one week (until December 12, 2008), at which time the article's fate will be determined unless more time for the discussion and/or vote is required. If you need to know how many mainspace edits you have, please use Special:Editcount. I will also remind you that you must meet the requirements of the voting policy to vote, and because of the controversial nature of the article I also feel it is important to point out that personal attacks against the author of this article will be delt with in accordance with all of our relevant policies. That is all I have to say for now. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Delete

 * 1) As the (somewhat reluctant) proposer. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
Please keep all discussion on this deletion nomination in this section rather than in the voting section. - Brandon Rhea (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)