Thread:OParris2017/@comment-104549-20180425162800

I reverted your recent edits adding "Fan Characters" and "Fan-Canon Articles" categories to some of your articles. The latter isn't a published category and the former won't be for long, but the larger issue is that neither is necessary. This is Star Wars Fanon—every article here is fan-based. The only alternative is "canon", and nothing here is. Even taken the other way (that "Fan-Canon Articles" is distinguished from "Fan-Fiction"), the category remains unnecessary due to the Categorization Policy's requirement for the most specific category. For the same reason "Jedi Knight" is required instead of the more generic "Jedi", "Fan Characters" is about as generic as it's possible to get (except "Fan-Canon Articles"); even Individuals is less generic (or at least at the same level), and an article that only fits Individuals without fitting a more specific category is rare indeed.

Let me know if you have any questions about this. 