Thread:Theorodore12345/@comment-104549-20170911013455/@comment-104549-20170924143650

Okay. So it's still wrong, and it's probably going to be deleted in the long run, but I want to use this as a teaching moment, so let me walk through this with you step-by-step. This is going to be a lot of text, but PLEASE READ IT ALL.

Your Information template looks like this:

Here's my analysis:
 * Your "Attention!", although unnecessary, is fine (unless it's "User-made", the default assumption is that you didn't make it).
 * Your "Description" is perfect.
 * Your "Source" is where we start to go off the rails.
 * First, you named the source, but didn't actually link to it. That source would be .  The coding should be , which produces .
 * Second, the image does not actually appear to be from Secrets of the Jedi. First I checked the cover gallery .  Then I did a Google Image search for "'Secrets of the Jedi' cover".  No cover I have found (in any language) has that image.  The image is not from that book.
 * Third, the picture appears to actually be an amalgam of two or more pictures. The face is that of actress .  The original image of her appears to have been taken in 2003; see all the details here.  I don't know the source of the body; I didn't bother looking for it.  Suffice to say somebody Photoshopped Leick's face onto a Jedi's body; it's a decently done Photoshop job, but that's what it is.
 * Finally, since it's an image digitally created by someone, if you want to use it you have two options:
 * Find the original upload and credit that as the source, OR
 * Source all component parts (yes, including the Jedi body) and note that it was previously compiled by someone else you can't identify.
 * Your "Author/Artist" is incorrect.
 * is, in fact, the author of Secrets of the Jedi. However, as we've already noted, the image is not from Secrets of the Jedi.  Even if it was, though, it is extraordinarily rare for the author of a book to also be the cover artist; in other words, even if the image was on the cover of Secrets of the Jedi, Jude Watson wouldn't be the "Author/Artist".  "Author" is a deceptive term here, but "Author/Artist" refers to the person who created the image itself, not the person who wrote the book (or TV show, or movie...) on or in which the image appeared.
 * As far as the person who Photoshopped the pieces together, if you can identify that person, that is the "Author/Artist". If you can't, you can leave the "Author/Artist" blank, but if you don't know, don't guess.
 * Your "Licensing" was on the right track. However—and I can not stress enough the importance of reading every word of the tutorial—it is coded improperly.  A licensing template (and, in fact, any template) uses double braces, not double brackets.  In other word, the coding is , not.
 * NB the space between the words. The Fair Use template has been a little finicky lately when users put a space between the words; sometimes it works better without the space, sometimes it makes no difference.  No idea why, just FYI.
 * Your "Other versions" is like your "Attention!"—unnecessary, but not wrong. You only need to note other versions of an image when they do exist; the presumption is that an image has no other versions unless they're mentioned.

If you have questions about any of the above, please reply here. I know you're trying hard, and I want to help you figure this all out.