Star Wars Fanon:Good articles/Nominations

'''PLEASE NOTE: Per the majority opinion of the High Priests, due to the High Priests not being as overwhelmed with nominations as they were in the past, we will now be accepting TEN nominations per round but no more than ten. This is subject to change in the coming weeks.'''

Star Wars Fanon's Good articles The good articles of the wiki are articles that represent the norm of Star Wars Fanon. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Star Wars Fanon:High Priests.

What makes a good article or what article should you nominate to be good? To answer that, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed, with at least one link to an article on Star Wars Fanon.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;all images must be captioned.
 * 4) &hellip;be sourced with all available appearances (if articles that involve said article subject are on this wiki).
 * 5) &hellip;be correctly categorized.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with improvement tags at the time of nomination, or any other templates.
 * 7) &hellip;have a sufficiently detailed introduction that can be used for the front page showcase box.
 * 8) &hellip;have a minimal amount of red links, and they must be insignificant red links. Important links must be filled, even if they are stubs.
 * 9) &hellip;have a complete, detailed "History" section, and a "Post mortem" section if the article is about a character that has died.
 * 10) &hellip;have a "Personality and traits" section for a character and "Characteristics" section if it is about a vehicle, class of vehicle etc.
 * 11) &hellip;have a "Behind the Scenes" section for any interesting facts about the character's creation, etc.

How to nominate:
 * 1) First, nominate an article you find to be worthy of Good Article status by putting it at the bottom of the list below. Add GAnom to any nominated article.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough. They will then supply reasons for doing so and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters will adjust the article until the objectors are satisfied
 * 4) If there are already five nominees on the page, you may not nominate anymore. If more than five nominees are posted, anything after the fifth nominee will be removed.
 * 5) The GAnom banner should be placed at the top of all nominated articles.

How to vote:
 * 1) Remember, you can only vote if you meet the requirements of the voting policy.
 * 2) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely and keep a sharp eye out for mistakes
 * 3) Afterward, either support or object the article’s nomination
 * 4) Whether you support or object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so and how it can be improved. If you do not provide a valid reason for your support or opposition, such votes will be removed.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters and anyone willing to improve the article. Action will be taken to please the objectors.

In addition, put the number sign, #, next to your name so the votes can be counted. Please sign your posts as well!

A small blue tick in the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is a good article.

Current Standings

 * 1) Abigaile Jade Kenobi (7)
 * 2) Wanderers (6)
 * 3) Battle of Bestine IV (3)
 * 4) Darth Krayt, Unit 8311, WraithX-Beta Interceptor (2)
 * 5) Rivan Onasi (-3)

=Nominations=

Oppose

 * 1) Requires expansion. Also, images should be formated like left, right, left, right, etc. - Brandon Rhea 04:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Requires expansion. I don't think images is a big deal, however when there aren't that many, left-right-left is the best way to go. -- Victor  ( talk ) 05:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per above. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  16:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Just wrapped this one up and since probably won't be on tomorrow and probably for a week, I decided to nominate it now.
 * Check HP review for things fixed so far.

Support

 * 1) Darth Abeonis Sith Council Sith Campaign 08:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Small, but GA material. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 11:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Besides a few very minor grammar mistakes mentioned on the HP review, this article's good to go. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per above. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Fails MOS just as Darth Abeonis did; "Main article" link is unnecessary because it can easily be integrated into the article itself; introduction, personliaty and traits are rather short. No talents section. Too short, also, IMO. -- Victor  ( talk ) 18:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Vic. - Brandon Rhea 14:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Same reasons as last week. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 11:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Very well written article, good pictures, good story. I enjoyed reading it. Dexington 14:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good article. Per above. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) It is well written, pictures are nice, and detailed. Good work. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Per above. -- Victor  ( talk ) 18:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Per above. - Brandon Rhea 14:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Why haven't I voted for this yet? Anyway, the article has been significantly expanded from it's earlier versions.  Should have no problem achieving FA status.  Second female FA NK! :) --  CurrentBigThing  ( Say It To My Face ) 15:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I will now give my support for this article. I would have before, but it was nomitated so late, I didn't think it had a chance anyway. Very good article. Dexington 13:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Could use a couple more links, but besides that, this is definitely GA material. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 18:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per HP review. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Very good. -- Victor  ( talk ) 18:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Per NKSCF. [[Image:Xepeyon.JPG|30px]] You Speak, I've Spoken 01:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Per above. - Brandon Rhea 14:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * As it is my own article, I will not give a review for it. As for the category, it is a Sith organization, though informal. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I've expanded since last time. S. p hobia MY ears... mouth... eyes...
 * 2) It is better than last time. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice. Good quality, only a couple little problems with it, as mentioned on the HP page. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) No. Not having a history section is not a "little problem". All articles must have a complete and detailed history. - Brandon Rhea 14:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral/Comments

 * Okay. I never really realized that a history section needed, as it is not either a government or charecter. But yeah, I can see how a history section is needed. I'll morph the popularity section into a history section. S. p hobia MY ears... mouth... eyes...
 * I'll finish adapting the history section to a true history format. Gtg for now, though. S. p hobia MY ears... mouth... eyes...

Support

 * 1) Unit 8311 17:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You will need to add more detail if this is nominated for FA, but for GA it's fine. - Brandon Rhea 14:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Agreed with Brandon.&mdash; Darthtyler Talk 16:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * 1) See HP review first. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral for now, at least until the things mentioned on the HP review are cleaned up. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * While I do like the article, I don't think a character article is complete, persay, if it doesn't have a death. Personally I believe there should be an ending to his story, though it probably doesn't matter to anyone else. Dexington 23:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I did what the HP review asked. Unit 8311 12:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Very nice, lengthy battle article. [[Image:NKsig.png|70px]] Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles [[Image:sabersmilygreend.jpg]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks good to me. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good detail, good story. This is pretty much a "duh" right here. - Brandon Rhea 14:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per above. Dexington 15:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) &mdash; Darthtyler Talk 16:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * Renominating. --  JM  76  Ask   Archives  [[Image:Sabersmilyjm76.jpg|20px]] 18:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Hasti's son is completed!&mdash; Darthtyler Talk 16:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)